Received: from mail-vb0-f61.google.com ([209.85.212.61]:60866) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Slr95-0004C6-85; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:39:20 -0700 Received: by vbzb23 with SMTP id b23sf6526981vbz.16 for ; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:39:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=SA1i+ol3QAfPlBZMDKf7Mebocw2oVpAiPBmykaO3Sm4=; b=ppcGO+GMeZj5pGhwebst+4IiGGSTz5BaROA/egcw7O7wooWTGTY0jqBo251WathKI4 9i8meiaso9kYWO58xezj/Y8P1qDxTmv0mv1MyoElvgNEFj+WoKIhBXd4LwXYr+XUO2RD 4jMPTCvEiMIjQnusW68F5+2GWTiSF7FJOLPYU= Received: by 10.50.153.135 with SMTP id vg7mr222179igb.1.1341275944548; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:39:04 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.163.42 with SMTP id yf10ls4127983igb.1.gmail; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:39:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.50.40.230 with SMTP id a6mr9288992igl.2.1341275943892; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:39:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.50.40.230 with SMTP id a6mr9288987igl.2.1341275943868; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:39:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ob0-f177.google.com (mail-ob0-f177.google.com [209.85.214.177]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ad4si4613036igc.1.2012.07.02.17.39.03 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:39:03 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of rpglover64@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.177 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.177; Received: by obbta17 with SMTP id ta17so9616356obb.36 for ; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:39:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.110.102 with SMTP id hz6mr10120268obb.79.1341275943450; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:39:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.182.17.97 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Jul 2012 17:38:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <90a7e54c-42fe-4ee0-9693-8155db9a7646@googlegroups.com> <62818d3a-c188-43d5-ad25-09c4cc9aca6c@googlegroups.com> <1341252212.22198.YahooMailNeo@web184415.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> From: ".arpis." Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 20:38:43 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Is there any demand for LoCCan3? To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: rpglover64@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of rpglover64@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.177 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rpglover64@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04447f4b27ba2e04c3e2248b X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --f46d04447f4b27ba2e04c3e2248b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable All of them could have a "by standard" place added, so both {ta karce ma'i la .niu.iork.} and {ta cladakyxa'i ma'i la .niu.iork.} would have the current meanings, but {ta karce} would mean the same thing as {ta karce ma'i zi'o} while {ta cladakyxa'i} would mean the same thing as {ta cladakyxa'i ma'i zo'e} and {ta cladadyxa'i fu la .niu.iork.} would have a non-existent place filled. Apologies if I misunderstand the meaning of "BAI zi'o" I've been thinking too much about math recently, so the way I view it might not be illuminating to anyone, but I view the current state of affairs as selbri having infinitely many places, the "numbered" of which are filled with {zo'e} by default and the others of which are filled with {zi'o} by default and I'm suggesting removing some numbered places that correspond to the same thing as a BAI place and filling the BAI place with {zo'e}. On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Jorge Llamb=EDas wro= te: > On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 3:35 PM, .arpis. > wrote: > > > > One of the things that drew me to lojban was the fact that the gismu > > relationships were carefully defined (e.g. [almost?] every one that cou= ld > > have a "by standard" place did). > > How do you determine which ones couldn't have a "by standard" place? > It seems to me that every relationship could have a "by standard" > place added, so those gismu that have an explicit one are only a small > fraction of those that could have it. > > mu'o mi'e xorxes > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den. > > --=20 mu'o mi'e .arpis. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den. --f46d04447f4b27ba2e04c3e2248b Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable All of them could have a "by standard" place added, so both {ta k= arce ma'i la .niu.iork.} and {ta cladakyxa'i ma'i la .niu.iork.= } would have the current meanings, but {ta karce} would mean the same thing= as {ta karce ma'i zi'o} while {ta cladakyxa'i} would mean the = same thing as {ta cladakyxa'i ma'i zo'e} and {ta cladadyxa'= i fu la .niu.iork.} would have a non-existent place filled.

Apologies if I misunderstand the meaning of "BAI zi'o"
I've been thinking too much about math recently, so the way I view= it might not be illuminating to anyone, but I view the current state of af= fairs as selbri having infinitely many places, the "numbered" of = which are filled with {zo'e} by default and the others of which are fil= led with {zi'o} by default and I'm suggesting removing some numbere= d places that correspond to the same thing as a BAI place and filling the B= AI place with {zo'e}.

On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Jorge Llamb= =EDas <jjllambias@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 3:35 PM, .arpis. <rpglover64+jbobau@gmail.com> wro= te:
>
> One of the things that drew me to lojban was the fact that the gismu > relationships were carefully defined (e.g. [almost?] every one that co= uld
> have a "by standard" place did).

How do you determine which ones couldn't have a "by standard= " place?
It seems to me that every relationship could have a "by standard"=
place added, so those gismu that have an explicit one are only a small
fraction of those that could have it.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.




--
mu'o mi= 'e .arpis.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--f46d04447f4b27ba2e04c3e2248b--