Received: from mail-bk0-f61.google.com ([209.85.214.61]:44035) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Sm0ab-0008BI-D1; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 03:44:22 -0700 Received: by bkwj4 with SMTP id j4sf204757bkw.16 for ; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 03:44:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=vayyYU22tW2lAiFSe8/6K9vGdStydaWhJGSNcZzPd8Y=; b=UmLcurYvdd7oCIDIwSKs8GNGxrbDg73ns98w9R8r2R80rJ+UXUcrslQXH3vgtO/9oJ d+sXHCZlQnnJRYomOdybUo/q1dm+qYuvzm35/d6gBTFR9nOjsn8x2TzLCjLyxpPWTotU eLVcPTX5ej1ouaN44RWkfUGgfI8avljEJmGKA= Received: by 10.204.10.84 with SMTP id o20mr560743bko.2.1341312245352; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 03:44:05 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.154.7 with SMTP id m7ls6365079bkw.5.gmail; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 03:44:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.154.76 with SMTP id n12mr2026932bkw.1.1341312243582; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 03:44:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.154.76 with SMTP id n12mr2026931bkw.1.1341312243546; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 03:44:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lb0-f172.google.com (mail-lb0-f172.google.com [209.85.217.172]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k7si12043856bks.2.2012.07.03.03.44.03 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 03 Jul 2012 03:44:03 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.172 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.217.172; Received: by mail-lb0-f172.google.com with SMTP id go11so12018836lbb.17 for ; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 03:44:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.146.101 with SMTP id tb5mr16993617lab.0.1341312243269; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 03:44:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.46.36 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 03:44:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9df28d86-8a11-45fc-ae47-8da7c611481d@x21g2000vbc.googlegroups.com> References: <9df28d86-8a11-45fc-ae47-8da7c611481d@x21g2000vbc.googlegroups.com> Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 04:44:03 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Not for wrong to lojban but to improving lojban From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.172 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f2348b3caff3604c3ea97fe X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --e89a8f2348b3caff3604c3ea97fe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 What little of this I can understand, I am completely opposed to. All of these suggestions are either based in something opposed to Lojban or are just stupid. As to which they are, I don't know, because I can't understand the author well enough. On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 4:14 AM, buroq_mat@yahoo.co.uk wrote: > coi > > some suggested ideas: > > (1) writing from right to left, where positive bodies in the nature > revolove around itself from right to left, where positive is good and > negative is evil "something from philosophy". > > (2) writing bridi lines from down to up of page, because from the > politeing behaviour that something transcends and does not fall > "something from philosophy". > > (3) we can add to optimal dictionary which I suggested before a > literal meaning "not wrong". > > and we should add "persons names" from other languages dictionaries. > > (4) we can contain all posipilities, so we can contain all letters in > the existence where there is two versions of letter light and heavy I > suggest capital letter is heavy and small letter is light "e.g. > lojban X and french r where french r can writen in small letter x, and > lojban R and lojban r where R is like italian r and lojban r like > english r" and so on... > > (5) I see not wrong if we use some special characters such as "? for > asking and ! for wondering and - between compound words and , for > quick stoping" "maybe add something to logical lojban connective". > > co'o > ki'es-di'es > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > > -- mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --e89a8f2348b3caff3604c3ea97fe Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable What little of this I can understand, I am completely opposed to. All of th= ese suggestions are either based in something opposed to Lojban or are just= stupid. As to which they are, I don't know, because I can't unders= tand the author well enough.

On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 4:14 AM, buroq_mat@yahoo.co.uk &l= t;buroq_mat@yaho= o.co.uk> wrote:
coi

some suggested ideas:

(1) writing from right to left, where positive bodies in the nature
revolove around itself from right to left, where positive is good and
negative is evil "something from philosophy".

(2) writing bridi lines from down to up of page, because from the
politeing behaviour that something transcends and does not fall
"something from philosophy".

(3) we can add to optimal dictionary which I suggested before a
literal meaning "not wrong".

and we should add "persons names" from other languages dictionari= es.

(4) we can contain all posipilities, so we can contain all letters in
the existence where there is two versions of letter light and heavy I
suggest capital letter is heavy and small letter is light "e.g.
lojban X and french r where french r can writen in small letter x, and
lojban R and lojban r where R is like italian r and lojban r like
english r" and so on...

(5) I see not wrong if we use some special characters such as "? for asking and ! for wondering and - between compound words and , for
quick stoping" "maybe add something to logical lojban connective&= quot;.

co'o
ki'es-di'es

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.




--
mu'o = mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi= .luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father= . :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--e89a8f2348b3caff3604c3ea97fe--