Received: from mail-gg0-f189.google.com ([209.85.161.189]:55346)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCKOXn8wTENruy_8EGgQl7R6K@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1Sm3Pc-0002dZ-HN; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 06:45:06 -0700
Received: by ggke5 with SMTP id e5sf7174010ggk.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 06:44:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject
         :mime-version:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results
         :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id
         :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe
         :list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=aIC6Gp6+h2Z4e2MKqbsOgeCPUqDvfHgvDstyGsK/Ar8=;
        b=VTeiF5z/bRQwPtUGuulpChqnZ81zFT0ivmB0HogGFT/HH+6z7UN6hM8/KA6DNcZW2G
         IAJUBC5Epp7vz4DdbGcoDXOsLLplgkqasBLt20AoTOSkGILOgekhrFdNMCiyyB6rlSP5
         5I/7DaiHn9XFSdXVAEFx2XqdTylQTyT7/L7/g=
Received: by 10.52.68.141 with SMTP id w13mr958874vdt.18.1341323098270;
        Tue, 03 Jul 2012 06:44:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.220.221.197 with SMTP id id5ls3718378vcb.5.gmail; Tue, 03 Jul
 2012 06:44:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.174.167 with SMTP id bt7mr3228vdc.15.1341323097781;
        Tue, 03 Jul 2012 06:44:57 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 06:44:57 -0700 (PDT)
From: gleki <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Message-Id: <99dcfd96-6041-42b3-ac59-f798b260c537@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <9df28d86-8a11-45fc-ae47-8da7c611481d@x21g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>
References: <9df28d86-8a11-45fc-ae47-8da7c611481d@x21g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>
Subject: [lojban] Re: Not for wrong to lojban but to improving lojban
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of
 gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates internal as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com; dkim=pass
 header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_2596_23941849.1341323097466"
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

------=_Part_2596_23941849.1341323097466
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Whatever la .ki'es.di'es. writes here he has made the right decision to 
join the Lojban community. pe'i no community in the world can be called 
intellectual elite as I can say it about Lojbanistan cuz the others use 
broken natural languages with their burden of broken semantics accumulated 
during their long historical development.

On Tuesday, July 3, 2012 2:14:51 PM UTC+4, buro...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
>
> coi 
>
> some suggested ideas: 
>
> (1) writing from right to left, where positive bodies in the nature 
> revolove around itself from right to left, where positive is good and 
> negative is evil "something from philosophy". 
>
> (2) writing bridi lines from down to up of page, because from the 
> politeing behaviour that something transcends and does not fall 
> "something from philosophy". 
>
> (3) we can add to optimal dictionary which I suggested before a 
> literal meaning "not wrong". 
>
> and we should add "persons names" from other languages dictionaries. 
>
> (4) we can contain all posipilities, so we can contain all letters in 
> the existence where there is two versions of letter light and heavy I 
> suggest capital letter is heavy and small letter is light "e.g. 
> lojban X and french r where french r can writen in small letter x, and 
> lojban R and lojban r where R is like italian r and lojban r like 
> english r" and so on... 
>
> (5) I see not wrong if we use some special characters such as "? for 
> asking and ! for wondering and - between compound words and , for 
> quick stoping" "maybe add something to logical lojban connective". 
>
> co'o 
> ki'es-di'es

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/eL2CiRJMva8J.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.


------=_Part_2596_23941849.1341323097466
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Whatever la .ki'es.di'es. writes here he has made the right decision to joi=
n the Lojban community. pe'i no community in the world can be called intell=
ectual elite as I can say it about Lojbanistan cuz the others use broken na=
tural languages with their burden of broken semantics accumulated during th=
eir long historical development.<br><br>On Tuesday, July 3, 2012 2:14:51 PM=
 UTC+4, buro...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=
=3D"margin: 0;margin-left: 0.8ex;border-left: 1px #ccc solid;padding-left: =
1ex;">coi
<br>
<br>some suggested ideas:
<br>
<br>(1) writing from right to left, where positive bodies in the nature
<br>revolove around itself from right to left, where positive is good and
<br>negative is evil "something from philosophy".
<br>
<br>(2) writing bridi lines from down to up of page, because from the
<br>politeing behaviour that something transcends and does not fall
<br>"something from philosophy".
<br>
<br>(3) we can add to optimal dictionary which I suggested before a
<br>literal meaning "not wrong".
<br>
<br>and we should add "persons names" from other languages dictionaries.
<br>
<br>(4) we can contain all posipilities, so we can contain all letters in
<br>the existence where there is two versions of letter light and heavy I
<br>suggest capital letter is heavy and small letter is light "e.g.
<br>lojban X and french r where french r can writen in small letter x, and
<br>lojban R and lojban r where R is like italian r and lojban r like
<br>english r" and so on...
<br>
<br>(5) I see not wrong if we use some special characters such as "? for
<br>asking and ! for wondering and - between compound words and , for
<br>quick stoping" "maybe add something to logical lojban connective".
<br>
<br>co'o
<br>ki'es-di'es</blockquote>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
lojban" group.<br />
To view this discussion on the web visit <a href=3D"https://groups.google.c=
om/d/msg/lojban/-/eL2CiRJMva8J">https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/eL=
2CiRJMva8J</a>.<br />=20
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou=
ps.com.<br />

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban=
?hl=3Den.<br />



------=_Part_2596_23941849.1341323097466--