Received: from mail-yw0-f57.google.com ([209.85.213.57]:34279) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SmuvX-0002DC-8j; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 15:53:54 -0700 Received: by yhr47 with SMTP id 47sf10243214yhr.12 for ; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 15:53:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-ct-class:x-ct-score:x-ct-refid:x-ct-spam :x-authority-analysis:x-cm-score:message-id:date:from:user-agent :mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=YM4EiVe4v22in7iSSmDiBOjI85D0/IHnElimzSi7n58=; b=4avicBeJAoVLKSj4ak8IqJSZRjgq1JrGGqowSe/m/MYWPi+C54ym15EEUxDkkpwZEr Jc/dvDr0Jq8M5CJ7OjTJWQlpaXrMC7F0Obcje/nrMw4dTkEcPUTbNdXOLzK95HoPec2s eHcctSyOSJj12d4rOWYwuzOPgp1ri57he198U= Received: by 10.224.206.4 with SMTP id fs4mr575419qab.3.1341528808859; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 15:53:28 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.224.116.146 with SMTP id m18ls15937423qaq.7.gmail; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 15:53:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.105.137 with SMTP id t9mr16747778qao.7.1341528807463; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 15:53:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.105.137 with SMTP id t9mr16747775qao.7.1341528807451; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 15:53:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eastrmfepo201.cox.net (eastrmfepo201.cox.net. [68.230.241.216]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id z30si1313059qcd.3.2012.07.05.15.53.27; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 15:53:27 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 68.230.241.216 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of lojbab@lojban.org) client-ip=68.230.241.216; Received: from eastrmimpo209.cox.net ([68.230.241.224]) by eastrmfepo201.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.04.00 201-2260-137-20101110) with ESMTP id <20120705225327.WEAE5450.eastrmfepo201.cox.net@eastrmimpo209.cox.net> for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 18:53:27 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.101] ([70.187.237.100]) by eastrmimpo209.cox.net with bizsmtp id WmtS1j00F2AfMYu02mtS11; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 18:53:26 -0400 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A020208.4FF61AE6.00BE,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=068CFsagVJli5dE+TaQBUnkXsqL349WKH5IIQ2ED1F0= c=1 sm=1 a=YsUzL_8ObRgA:10 a=eog42AlzKkMA:10 a=xmHE3fpoGJwA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=MQZuvjT3xUZLKv0gclfWMg==:17 a=-0jx0YwIWBttO051BEUA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=MQZuvjT3xUZLKv0gclfWMg==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Message-ID: <4FF61B58.8040608@lojban.org> Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 18:55:20 -0400 From: Robert LeChevalier User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] baby words: position/shape, or something. References: <20120705172307.GC4293@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <20120705185623.GE4293@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> In-Reply-To: <20120705185623.GE4293@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> X-Original-Sender: lojbab@lojban.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 68.230.241.216 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of lojbab@lojban.org) smtp.mail=lojbab@lojban.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 11:39:57AM -0600, Jonathan Jones wrote: >> I'm honestly surprised that 1) we don't have a gismu for this >> concept, and 2) that no one's really noticed it until recently. I >> would think this concept would be a well-used one. > > That's starting to be my feeling as well; I think it deserves a > gismu. The easy answer to "does it deserve a gismu" is : Does any language (and in particular our source languages) express this concept in a single word? If not, then it is hard to claim that it is so basic a concept as to warrant one. As for the concept, Nora suggests "stura" (structure/arrangement/organization) or "morna" (another expression of pattern/arrangement), or even ciste which talks about an arrangement of elements, to which I will add "tcini" (which includes position) - whichever is used, one "binxo"s that position/state. The action taken in assuming a new form or position is probably some form of polje or tcena. I always thought of crawling as horizontal clambering "cpare" (and had this in mind when defining the gismu), so assuming the crawling position would be "pinparturbi'o (with other possibilities for the third element per above). lojbab -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.