Received: from mail-qc0-f189.google.com ([209.85.216.189]:40659) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SmwhH-0002jV-Hr; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 17:47:08 -0700 Received: by qcac11 with SMTP id c11sf8261275qca.16 for ; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 17:46:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:user-agent :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type:content-disposition; bh=GxW7Gcfpgu7lxpq3M2Dwv4tTBOvCan7SZl/c+iYSEko=; b=mgC7dduPHLZR4wQ4KMORE0TLLaaOVEc8gnror7GUKp3Y8F6eeKMpqlBtobj5EMYoGM er1QrSGFxCi0Pd3s3a2xy///KN6w6EyHQZ0cdJtLDP3aFgyFHQMPtmFVXEMkiye5SB2q 8EaeTS50ZiYtQKIb1B4BiwwsklxosVqkFdNek= Received: by 10.68.240.70 with SMTP id vy6mr1620723pbc.8.1341535612652; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 17:46:52 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.68.211.194 with SMTP id ne2ls1716484pbc.9.gmail; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 17:46:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.223.73 with SMTP id qs9mr11414995pbc.7.1341535611383; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 17:46:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.223.73 with SMTP id qs9mr11414992pbc.7.1341535611347; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 17:46:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from stodi.digitalkingdom.org (mail.digitalkingdom.org. [173.13.139.236]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id tf10si1933904pbc.0.2012.07.05.17.46.51 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 05 Jul 2012 17:46:51 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) client-ip=173.13.139.236; Received: from rlpowell by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Smwh8-0002jQ-3D for lojban@googlegroups.com; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 17:46:50 -0700 Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 17:46:50 -0700 From: Robin Lee Powell To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] baby words: position/shape, or something. Message-ID: <20120706004649.GC3566@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban@googlegroups.com References: <20120705172307.GC4293@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <20120705185623.GE4293@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <4FF61B58.8040608@lojban.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4FF61B58.8040608@lojban.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Original-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 06:55:20PM -0400, Robert LeChevalier wrote: > Robin Lee Powell wrote: > >On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 11:39:57AM -0600, Jonathan Jones wrote: > >>I'm honestly surprised that 1) we don't have a gismu for this > >>concept, and 2) that no one's really noticed it until recently. > >>I would think this concept would be a well-used one. > > > >That's starting to be my feeling as well; I think it deserves a > >gismu. > > The easy answer to "does it deserve a gismu" is : Does any > language (and in particular our source languages) express this > concept in a single word? If not, then it is hard to claim that > it is so basic a concept as to warrant one. I would be very surprised if you could find a language that *didn't* have a word like English's "position" in "you changed position!". Did you have some in mind? > As for the concept, Nora suggests "stura" > (structure/arrangement/organization) or "morna" (another > expression of pattern/arrangement), or even ciste which talks > about an arrangement of elements, to which I will add "tcini" > (which includes position) - whichever is used, one "binxo"s that > position/state. {stura} is decent for this. I don't understand morna at all. {ciste} is not bad. {tcini} seems far too general. > The action taken in assuming a new form or position is probably > some form of polje or tcena. *nod* I use {tcena} a lot; I'd not been using {polje}, and I probably should be. > I always thought of crawling as horizontal clambering "cpare" (and > had this in mind when defining the gismu), so assuming the > crawling position would be "pinparturbi'o (with other > possibilities for the third element per above). I agree WRT cpare. -Robin -- http://singinst.org/ : Our last, best hope for a fantastic future. .i ko na cpedu lo nu stidi vau loi jbopre .i danfu lu na go'i li'u .e lu go'i li'u .i ji'a go'i lu na'e go'i li'u .e lu go'i na'i li'u .e lu no'e go'i li'u .e lu to'e go'i li'u .e lu lo mamta be do cu sofybakni li'u -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.