Received: from mail-qc0-f189.google.com ([209.85.216.189]:57036) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SnLL4-0004yM-Cr; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 20:05:52 -0700 Received: by qcac11 with SMTP id c11sf9346189qca.16 for ; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 20:05:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=L2Wl4yEaWiSUwVgz8w1Sb6VtUf91ch8kVRo9yYyqgbo=; b=IzoaqBkMzqX7QoGTd2JGEghiHMKMIofhmZAkJ2b9hIAA8Nwk4rYGJuLs/vt4edQe2T OQuq1Md/B6J1Vd8ifDR4AxN5im+/q4zpqdLNceQbw9cKIyKYRXMyxsJGUNABKVyB0nSe Tjy9WVMKbpWGCuQkOiVYY2T1/Ib122/QoVPmg= Received: by 10.236.77.138 with SMTP id d10mr3037184yhe.14.1341630335856; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 20:05:35 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.236.81.101 with SMTP id l65ls20319485yhe.5.gmail; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 20:05:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.73.131 with SMTP id v3mr55504538yhd.6.1341630335141; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 20:05:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.73.131 with SMTP id v3mr55504536yhd.6.1341630335128; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 20:05:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-gh0-f180.google.com (mail-gh0-f180.google.com [209.85.160.180]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f27si2745849anj.1.2012.07.06.20.05.35 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 06 Jul 2012 20:05:35 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lytlesw@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.180 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.160.180; Received: by ghbz12 with SMTP id z12so8614270ghb.25 for ; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 20:05:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.146.6 with SMTP id h6mr16760251icv.53.1341630334852; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 20:05:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.30.68 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Jul 2012 20:05:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <28c5220c-26fb-480f-8305-51e3cf0cb5c2@googlegroups.com> References: <90a7e54c-42fe-4ee0-9693-8155db9a7646@googlegroups.com> <62818d3a-c188-43d5-ad25-09c4cc9aca6c@googlegroups.com> <1341252212.22198.YahooMailNeo@web184415.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <4FF20621.1090100@lojban.org> <1341333405.7836.YahooMailNeo@web184416.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <4FF74E66.1020605@gmail.com> <28c5220c-26fb-480f-8305-51e3cf0cb5c2@googlegroups.com> From: MorphemeAddict Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 23:05:14 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Is there any demand for LoCCan3? To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: lytlesw@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lytlesw@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.180 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lytlesw@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba6e8716875d9004c434a7ad X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --90e6ba6e8716875d9004c434a7ad Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 10:45 PM, la gleki wrote: > > > On Saturday, July 7, 2012 12:51:13 AM UTC+4, stevo wrote: >> >> To return to the original question, I would like a new version of >> Loglan/Lojban that fixed the perceived problems associated with those two >> languages. > > What are the problems perceived by you? > I would redo the entire vocabulary, eliminate rafsi or at least regularize the means for lujvo creation, simplify the grammar a lot. RPN, mentioned in a recent post, appeals to me. I like the simple grammar of Rick Morneau's Latejami. Many of the issues of Lojban's faults are beyond me: scoping issues, variables, prenexes. I'd like it to be more like math notation. I don't know what my solution would look like (well, I have a version, but >> it's only a relex of the gismu, so I don't normally count it). >> And the sooner the better. >> > Who can do that if not those interested in loccan3? :) > I doubt anyone would do it if he wasn't interested in the result. And the defects of Lojban are best determined by fluent speakers. So until there is a community that can debate the issue in fluent Lojban, it probably shouldn't happen. stevo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --90e6ba6e8716875d9004c434a7ad Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 10:45 PM, la glek= i <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:


On Saturday, July 7, 2012 12:51:13 AM UTC+4, stev= o wrote:
To return to the original q= uestion, I would like a new version of Loglan/Lojban that fixed the perceiv= ed problems associated with those two languages.
What are the problems perceived by you?=A0

I would redo the entire vocabulary, eliminate rafsi or at = least regularize the means for lujvo creation, simplify the grammar a lot. = RPN, mentioned in a recent post, appeals to me. I like the simple grammar o= f Rick Morneau's Latejami.=A0
Many of the issues of Lojban's faults are beyond me: scoping issue= s, variables, prenexes. I'd like it to be more like math notation.=A0

I don't know= what my solution would look like (well, I have a version, but it's onl= y a relex of the gismu, so I don't normally count it).=A0
And the sooner the better.
Who can do that if = not those interested in loccan3? :)

I= doubt anyone would do it if he wasn't interested in the result. And th= e defects of Lojban are best determined by fluent speakers. So until there = is a community that can debate the issue in fluent Lojban, it probably shou= ldn't happen.=A0

stevo

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--90e6ba6e8716875d9004c434a7ad--