Received: from mail-vb0-f61.google.com ([209.85.212.61]:49737) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SnMyW-0005pr-U2; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 21:50:34 -0700 Received: by vbzb23 with SMTP id b23sf11136136vbz.16 for ; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 21:50:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=Xy8iGNWChUm/I8hFGcpfWbxTYdZI13vvXQrjtTpgIOg=; b=UuVAbg4v00df/YrkGoWeohYLw0rgPiG7iAQPi7+nNa1JVjEVfafd+cgzvOg0NdetfL 633dW+T8dNfh0lQj1AiqeWhLj5GaiTv60gxU/TfUoYTY48FCkaH5blns9qAvB1SCgtZw g7TckfS71AuA/sPDgFwFFdqVz1kEbzaUgeZas= Received: by 10.52.23.65 with SMTP id k1mr741968vdf.7.1341636626526; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 21:50:26 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.52.35.202 with SMTP id k10ls5491639vdj.0.gmail; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 21:50:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.21.79 with SMTP id t15mr2030887vde.16.1341636626113; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 21:50:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 21:50:25 -0700 (PDT) From: "la .lindar." To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: <9d023dbf-28d1-42de-84a4-a630ae020a82@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: References: <90a7e54c-42fe-4ee0-9693-8155db9a7646@googlegroups.com> <62818d3a-c188-43d5-ad25-09c4cc9aca6c@googlegroups.com> <1341252212.22198.YahooMailNeo@web184415.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <4FF20621.1090100@lojban.org> <1341333405.7836.YahooMailNeo@web184416.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <4FF74E66.1020605@gmail.com> <28c5220c-26fb-480f-8305-51e3cf0cb5c2@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Is there any demand for LoCCan3? MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: lindarthebard@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lindarthebard@gmail.com designates internal as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lindarthebard@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_485_7268656.1341636625863" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_485_7268656.1341636625863 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Guys currently in San Mateo, please discuss la xorxes's proposals > once > again. Make connectives easier to use and learn until there we get many > more lojbanists. It would be too late to fix anything then. While it is, as of right now, ultimately the decision of Robin Powell, I will, as a member of the BPFK, will not approve the revision I think you're talking about (making jeks work the same place eks work) and will loudly voice my opinion against it. I think it's a horrible idea and removes the conciseness of the language as it stands. There's no reason to remove eks and I don't think it's that bloody difficult to learn all of the connectors. If you mean something else, please let me know. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/NLckddav0F0J. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. ------=_Part_485_7268656.1341636625863 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Guys currently in San Mateo, p= lease discuss la xorxes's proposals once again= . Make connectives easier to use and learn until there we get  many mo= re lojbanists. It would be too late to fix anything then.
=
While it is, as of right now, ultimately the decision of Rob= in Powell, I will, as a member of the BPFK, will not approve the revision I= think you're talking about (making jeks work the same place eks work) and = will loudly voice my opinion against it. I think it's a horrible idea and r= emoves the conciseness of the language as it stands. There's no reason to r= emove eks and I don't think it's that bloody difficult to learn all of the = connectors.

If you mean something else, please let= me know. 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/NL= ckddav0F0J.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
------=_Part_485_7268656.1341636625863--