Received: from mail-gh0-f189.google.com ([209.85.160.189]:50108) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SnYh3-0006ph-Ez; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 10:21:25 -0700 Received: by ghbf16 with SMTP id f16sf11790982ghb.16 for ; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 10:21:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=t27TqvBIiUttnJ8XQ6pysB1oXk/krtGW7SCY5E8g3g8=; b=1rrOJZ6vU/Mf4aHvWxeUmZjocwIywKPL+2i+2eZO+nAOanSCC0aUKp1KZd+hmIXTqy wL9OP7PBL9HpQq3SKH0qasf/H1gaTUWoQIAx8LDM16XQboadcqby50gnnfP9pi6ZRRK2 ERNMKj47bCxpE+49iRMNROuGWRyQDXd7tu/fA= Received: by 10.52.66.44 with SMTP id c12mr1843473vdt.19.1341681671010; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 10:21:11 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.220.141.4 with SMTP id k4ls3793092vcu.9.gmail; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 10:21:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.240.229 with SMTP id wd5mr27260294vdc.8.1341681669869; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 10:21:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.240.229 with SMTP id wd5mr27260292vdc.8.1341681669850; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 10:21:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vb0-f53.google.com (mail-vb0-f53.google.com [209.85.212.53]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y20si3096394vdd.0.2012.07.07.10.21.09 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 07 Jul 2012 10:21:09 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of veijo.vilva@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.53 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.212.53; Received: by vbbfc26 with SMTP id fc26so7175486vbb.12 for ; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 10:21:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.100.67 with SMTP id ew3mr14020633vdb.36.1341681669462; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 10:21:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.159.193 with HTTP; Sat, 7 Jul 2012 10:21:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9d023dbf-28d1-42de-84a4-a630ae020a82@googlegroups.com> References: <90a7e54c-42fe-4ee0-9693-8155db9a7646@googlegroups.com> <62818d3a-c188-43d5-ad25-09c4cc9aca6c@googlegroups.com> <1341252212.22198.YahooMailNeo@web184415.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <4FF20621.1090100@lojban.org> <1341333405.7836.YahooMailNeo@web184416.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <4FF74E66.1020605@gmail.com> <28c5220c-26fb-480f-8305-51e3cf0cb5c2@googlegroups.com> <9d023dbf-28d1-42de-84a4-a630ae020a82@googlegroups.com> Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 20:21:09 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Is there any demand for LoCCan3? From: Veijo Vilva To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: veijo.vilva@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of veijo.vilva@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.53 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=veijo.vilva@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf307f349a4f593004c4409b83 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --20cf307f349a4f593004c4409b83 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 7 July 2012 07:50, la .lindar. wrote: > Guys currently in San Mateo, please discuss la xorxes's proposals >> once >> again. Make connectives easier to use and learn until there we get many >> more lojbanists. It would be too late to fix anything then. > > > While it is, as of right now, ultimately the decision of Robin Powell, I > will, as a member of the BPFK, will not approve the revision I think you're > talking about (making jeks work the same place eks work) and will loudly > voice my opinion against it. I think it's a horrible idea and removes the > conciseness of the language as it stands. There's no reason to remove eks > and I don't think it's that bloody difficult to learn all of the connectors. > I had a look at the "mad" proposals, and in my opinion they don't seem mad at all and would make the language much more concise than the present form is. I'd make one more simplification, i.e., use only GI as a connective medial. The PEG version of the Lojban grammar is slightly more permissive than the old YACC version was and allows a few more KU's to be elided thus removing the YACC derived extra KU problem mentioned in the proposal. With the additional GI change to the proposal, the PEG grammar can be modified to accept both usage versions without breaking any old texts which now pass the parser (all old text don't pass, BTW.) The minimum change affects only four rules in the BEG, and the resulting parser gives an identical parse for Alice compared to the one produced by my unmodified parser. This kind of change would keep the underlying grammar identical (except for the ortogonalization of the tanru connectives), only some surface details would change. This would be a much smaller change than xorlo, which was rather a fundamental change and, e.g., for me much more difficult to stomach than these "mad" proposals, which are more akin to normal, fluid, living language evolution a streamlining but a very controlled one compared to the phenomena in natural language evolution. veion -- web site: http://galactinus.net/vilva/ on Google+: https://plus.google.com/106533767817816079660/posts -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --20cf307f349a4f593004c4409b83 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 7 July 2012 07:50, la .lindar. <lindarthebard@gm= ail.com> wrote:
Guys currently in= San Mateo, please discuss la xorxes's proposa= ls once again. Make connectives easier to use and learn until there we = get =A0many more lojbanists. It would be too late to fix anything then.

While it is, as of right now, ultimately the deci= sion of Robin Powell, I will, as a member of the BPFK, will not approve the= revision I think you're talking about (making jeks work the same place= eks work) and will loudly voice my opinion against it. I think it's a = horrible idea and removes the conciseness of the language as it stands. The= re's no reason to remove eks and I don't think it's that bloody= difficult to learn all of the connectors.

I had a look at the "mad" propos= als, and in my opinion they don't seem mad at all and would make the la= nguage much more concise than the present form is. I'd make one more si= mplification, i.e., use only GI as a connective medial. The PEG version of = the Lojban grammar is slightly more permissive than the old YACC version wa= s and allows a few more KU's to be elided thus removing the YACC derive= d extra KU problem mentioned in the proposal.

With the additional GI change to the proposal, the PEG = grammar can be modified to accept both usage versions without breaking any = old texts which now pass the parser (all old text don't pass, BTW.) The= minimum change affects only four rules in the BEG, and the resulting parse= r gives an identical parse for Alice compared to the one produced by my unm= odified parser.

This kind of change would keep the underlying grammar i= dentical (except for the ortogonalization of the tanru connectives), only s= ome surface details would change. This would be a much smaller change than = xorlo, which was rather a fundamental change and, e.g., for me much more di= fficult to stomach than these "mad" proposals, which are more aki= n to normal, fluid, living language evolution a streamlining but a very con= trolled one compared to the phenomena in natural language evolution.=A0

=A0 =A0 veion
--

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--20cf307f349a4f593004c4409b83--