Received: from mail-ob0-f189.google.com ([209.85.214.189]:64445)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCPWm4dvUDRD1iOX_BBoEztd-cg@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1SnmqB-0003hS-Hm; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 01:27:40 -0700
Received: by obbun3 with SMTP id un3sf11612835obb.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 01:27:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:mime-version:date:in-reply-to:references:user-agent
         :x-http-useragent:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=CEcIqsQyNoglU+iSJhj8KTTyGStsMaw4hgwXeY8chsE=;
        b=0F6YpEFmo5LkYWPgV/TxeTaXBjf8+iL/fke0ZankflnQiyoritM7dVrDK/1XIrzvIn
         /3lXZfXIgBwQy/EZJeUQ2EJ/W2hVDQj7yQLHxAIjQXN4ZLltPpsTHXeOH46xlfRD3Mpm
         VOWBoBQW+sODwRbRRAtlFrSFp9sx2uZY4KZh4=
Received: by 10.52.68.141 with SMTP id w13mr904091vdt.18.1341736053225;
        Sun, 08 Jul 2012 01:27:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.220.141.4 with SMTP id k4ls3906887vcu.9.gmail; Sun, 08 Jul
 2012 01:27:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.66.44 with SMTP id c12mr1888795vdt.19.1341736052733; Sun,
 08 Jul 2012 01:27:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 6g2000vbv.googlegroups.com with HTTP; Sun, 8 Jul 2012 01:27:32
 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 01:27:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <e3d845f7-1071-4451-adc9-74a1e2e86c87@q29g2000vby.googlegroups.com>
References: <dc10c36b-3079-4bb3-ab94-6b472bd9997a@googlegroups.com> <e3d845f7-1071-4451-adc9-74a1e2e86c87@q29g2000vby.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:13.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/13.0.1,gzip(gfe)
Message-ID: <81758a87-b79d-4c4d-a290-0ebaaa261f8b@6g2000vbv.googlegroups.com>
Subject: [lojban] Re: 'Solve & coagula' in lojban?
From: Kosmaton <Kosmaton@gmx.com>
To: lojban <lojban@googlegroups.com>
X-Original-Sender: kosmaton@gmx.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain
 of Kosmaton@gmx.com designates internal as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=Kosmaton@gmx.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmx.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

In fact, if I read the definitions of {fendi} and {jorne} carefully,
{fedjo'e} would not be ambiguous, it would be 'splitting, and being
joined' (active for splitting, passive for being joined). And that is
why .arpis suggested {selfedjo'e} rather than something like
{fedseljo'e}?

How much compounding can you do? {fedselfedla'ajo'e} for 'splitting,
being split, connecting, and being connected?


On 8 jul, 09:55, Kosmaton <Kosma...@gmx.com> wrote:
> Thanks a lot Jacob and .arpis for explaining these aspects! I am now
> tending to just paint {selfedjo'e} on the boat (would you include the
> curly braces?), and refer to her as {la selfedjo'e}. It is more
> compact than the longer imperative phrase, and if I get it right the
> meaning is 'being split and joined', which is good.
>
> Of perhaps just {fedjo'e}. That's even shorter and avoids confusion
> with 'self' in English. And I'm happy to leave it open whether things
> are being split and joined, or doing the splitting and joining - maybe
> both at once. Or is such ambiguity frowned upon in the lojban ethos?
>
> I think {fendi} captures the meaning better than {runta}, but just out
> of interest, how would you form the compound word with {runta}? I
> gather that for {fedjo'e} you stuck the two relevant rafsi together
> (just from scanning what jbovlaste says), but no rafsi is listed for
> {runta}.
>
> Thanks again!

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.