Received: from mail-vc0-f189.google.com ([209.85.220.189]:54375) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Snmwr-0003jB-2h; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 01:34:40 -0700 Received: by vcbfo14 with SMTP id fo14sf12366174vcb.16 for ; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 01:34:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=WmDFNffjOLrvacKknCKQNdk8+LUVX1SoAiRkQ+RhzaM=; b=Yi7QZ8baLfgbu30mYjwYiOVEU5d3rUPwwrWxDQoEIGLc/rrJ1Dv60PkxpST4dkYwb/ rKexvt3/LpjyiBhPvyzq98WBndSr7OEh8PTVsj985J90eWDW/66sH49p5DKlOptuE0wC BX4BTjNyKAwYvLbbipTapznktzBVwp0xbXbvQ= Received: by 10.50.171.102 with SMTP id at6mr418024igc.6.1341736466076; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 01:34:26 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.231.80.14 with SMTP id r14ls11049231ibk.4.gmail; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 01:34:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.50.197.134 with SMTP id iu6mr6800407igc.1.1341736464939; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 01:34:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.50.197.134 with SMTP id iu6mr6800406igc.1.1341736464924; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 01:34:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s10si2265780igs.0.2012.07.08.01.34.24 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 08 Jul 2012 01:34:24 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lytlesw@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.182 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.182; Received: by obbun3 with SMTP id un3so13173659obb.41 for ; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 01:34:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.43.106.147 with SMTP id du19mr18596080icc.56.1341736464462; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 01:34:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.30.68 with HTTP; Sun, 8 Jul 2012 01:34:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <81758a87-b79d-4c4d-a290-0ebaaa261f8b@6g2000vbv.googlegroups.com> References: <81758a87-b79d-4c4d-a290-0ebaaa261f8b@6g2000vbv.googlegroups.com> From: MorphemeAddict Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 04:34:04 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: 'Solve & coagula' in lojban? To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: lytlesw@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lytlesw@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.182 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lytlesw@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf30334d3158b4f004c44d5d75 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --20cf30334d3158b4f004c44d5d75 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Between "d" and "s" there must be a "y", since "d" is voiced and "s" is unvoiced (i.e., the voicing doesn't match): {fedyseljo'e}, {fedyselfedla'ajo'e}. stevo On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 4:27 AM, Kosmaton wrote: > In fact, if I read the definitions of {fendi} and {jorne} carefully, > {fedjo'e} would not be ambiguous, it would be 'splitting, and being > joined' (active for splitting, passive for being joined). And that is > why .arpis suggested {selfedjo'e} rather than something like > {fedseljo'e}? > > How much compounding can you do? {fedselfedla'ajo'e} for 'splitting, > being split, connecting, and being connected? > > > On 8 jul, 09:55, Kosmaton wrote: > > Thanks a lot Jacob and .arpis for explaining these aspects! I am now > > tending to just paint {selfedjo'e} on the boat (would you include the > > curly braces?), and refer to her as {la selfedjo'e}. It is more > > compact than the longer imperative phrase, and if I get it right the > > meaning is 'being split and joined', which is good. > > > > Of perhaps just {fedjo'e}. That's even shorter and avoids confusion > > with 'self' in English. And I'm happy to leave it open whether things > > are being split and joined, or doing the splitting and joining - maybe > > both at once. Or is such ambiguity frowned upon in the lojban ethos? > > > > I think {fendi} captures the meaning better than {runta}, but just out > > of interest, how would you form the compound word with {runta}? I > > gather that for {fedjo'e} you stuck the two relevant rafsi together > > (just from scanning what jbovlaste says), but no rafsi is listed for > > {runta}. > > > > Thanks again! > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --20cf30334d3158b4f004c44d5d75 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Between "d" and "s" there must be a "y", sinc= e "d" is voiced and "s" is unvoiced (i.e., the voicing = doesn't match): {fedyseljo'e}, {fedyselfedla'ajo'e}.=A0
stevo

On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 = at 4:27 AM, Kosmaton <Kosmaton@gmx.com> wrote:
In fact, if I read the definitions of {fendi} and {jorne} carefully,
{fedjo'e} would not be ambiguous, it would be 'splitting, and being=
joined' (active for splitting, passive for being joined). And that is why .arpis suggested {selfedjo'e} rather than something like
{fedseljo'e}?

How much compounding can you do? {fedselfedla'ajo'e} for 'split= ting,
being split, connecting, and being connected?


On 8 jul, 09:55, Kosmaton <Kosma...@= gmx.com> wrote:
> Thanks a lot Jacob and .arpis for explaining these aspects! I am now > tending to just paint {selfedjo'e} on the boat (would you include = the
> curly braces?), and refer to her as {la selfedjo'e}. It is more > compact than the longer imperative phrase, and if I get it right the > meaning is 'being split and joined', which is good.
>
> Of perhaps just {fedjo'e}. That's even shorter and avoids conf= usion
> with 'self' in English. And I'm happy to leave it open whe= ther things
> are being split and joined, or doing the splitting and joining - maybe=
> both at once. Or is such ambiguity frowned upon in the lojban ethos? >
> I think {fendi} captures the meaning better than {runta}, but just out=
> of interest, how would you form the compound word with {runta}? I
> gather that for {fedjo'e} you stuck the two relevant rafsi togethe= r
> (just from scanning what jbovlaste says), but no rafsi is listed for > {runta}.
>
> Thanks again!

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--20cf30334d3158b4f004c44d5d75--