Received: from mail-lb0-f189.google.com ([209.85.217.189]:52063) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SnqrE-0004tK-Ve; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 05:45:10 -0700 Received: by lbol5 with SMTP id l5sf7755768lbo.16 for ; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 05:44:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-authenticated:x-provags-id:message-id :date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-y-gmx-trusted:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=N61ATTscG0EbC5qEl661XHss7v8PSmFuYvuL4BSFtzw=; b=L/x68McX7KHDc+tIXs0be9UdphPHNJzDS8CQaUsnMO97RlLMa28sZKDPdwseVWKEI3 zT+C2hAgQL5YFz1/+C6kJW57M033brnHp2OU8jwt3HNX/hUDitxahNsTltYeYPqAQWmv CjfQWR43PMghixwuGQgx3geLXXSOxLg8vDojs= Received: by 10.216.71.10 with SMTP id q10mr190546wed.61.1341751490368; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 05:44:50 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.216.206.198 with SMTP id l48ls7132175weo.3.gmail; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 05:44:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.8.41 with SMTP id o9mr1433881wia.4.1341751488850; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 05:44:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.8.41 with SMTP id o9mr1433880wia.4.1341751488794; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 05:44:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net. [213.165.64.23]) by gmr-mx.google.com with SMTP id o7si2222784wix.1.2012.07.08.05.44.48; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 05:44:48 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of seladwa@gmx.de designates 213.165.64.23 as permitted sender) client-ip=213.165.64.23; Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 08 Jul 2012 12:44:48 -0000 Received: from p57A0945E.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO [192.168.1.33]) [87.160.148.94] by mail.gmx.net (mp001) with SMTP; 08 Jul 2012 14:44:48 +0200 X-Authenticated: #54293076 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+5lmhvny+5SmnkRtXQCBV/yh/sFp+XiVCsr9zoPn 7IIeFsK2E75Ll4 Message-ID: <4FF980BE.4020406@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2012 14:44:46 +0200 From: selpa'i User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: jbonunsla 2012: Post #2 References: <20120708071832.GU3566@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Original-Sender: seladwa@gmx.de X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of seladwa@gmx.de designates 213.165.64.23 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=seladwa@gmx.de Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / coi If you don't mind, I'd like to comment on each point, knowing well that a lot comes down to opinion: Am 08.07.2012 09:44, schrieb la .lindar.: > >From my notes (brief summary to be expanded perhaps never): > > {tolcliva} is crap and you pretty much should never use it. How is it crap? Is this just your (sg.) opinion or did you (pl.) come to an agreement about it? You gotta be more specific than "it's crap, you can't use it". Both tolcliva and mo'u klama / klamu'o have their place. > Agree to disagree on (or attempt to deprecate, or just say 'fuck it' > regarding) the weird vowel letterals. Some people don't like them, but I find them prettier than .a'y .e'y .i'y .o'y .u'y. The obvious disadvantage is that .abu is two words so zo can't quote it. > Agree to disagree on whether time can be {clani} or {barda}. Time can be clani. Time has a dimension and anything with a dimension can be long or short in that dimension. > We solved the "units per unit" issue with {dikni}, but may still have > other issues. What's the proposed solution? > Kill with fire all of the 'by standard' places in favour of a BAI that > does the same thing. I strongly disagree. There are a good number of "by standard" places that are used a lot, and I don't want to use BAI to get access to them. xamgu3 and dukse3 are two very common examples. > Stuff we need to discuss tomorrow: One thing you might want to look at is how some gismu have built-in jai while others don't. Compare for example bebna, which has a jai'd x1 where the x2 is basically a fai-place, and fenki, which doesn't. This inconsistency slows down the learning process to some degree. Does anybody else think this could be improved? > latro'a/tsani's idea of how {ka} works. > JVS sucks hairy balls (I'll get into more detail) It has some bugs, but it's free and works. Sure it could be better, but I wouldn't be so harsh. mu'o mi'e la selpa'i -- .i pau mi me ma .i pa mai ko mi jungau la'e di'u .i ba bo mi va'o lo nu nelci lo nu me ma kau cu barkla .i va'o lo nu na nelci cu denpa ti lo nu mi drata -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.