Received: from mail-yx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.213.189]:37721) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SnxVB-0000XD-Up; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 12:50:45 -0700 Received: by yenl13 with SMTP id l13sf12899880yen.16 for ; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 12:50:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:user-agent :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type:content-disposition; bh=2VOPLalBSgZK7aR+H27DxByxLm4HGulH9rdLsJSmH48=; b=2LBh8Ag6w1vjm/6HoHSMbuiap0gjDMubiV+/Y2I2npUJMsaOdM2Ogsbela1ZW4yBzA jHU+YQdXEKiPpN6KyA6APsBkCdv2hTvpYYCdmirY0xJrwnM4oSCeMDp+zHCqDvJoELcH DWpnSFjw+UmRSKXamh7rHsiQjDrQF5n8ZPIf0= Received: by 10.68.222.197 with SMTP id qo5mr2167085pbc.13.1341777035402; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 12:50:35 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.68.226.132 with SMTP id rs4ls8902333pbc.6.gmail; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 12:50:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.223.73 with SMTP id qs9mr19178154pbc.7.1341777034901; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 12:50:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.223.73 with SMTP id qs9mr19178153pbc.7.1341777034885; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 12:50:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from stodi.digitalkingdom.org (mail.digitalkingdom.org. [173.13.139.236]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id oh7si44306pbb.2.2012.07.08.12.50.34 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 08 Jul 2012 12:50:34 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) client-ip=173.13.139.236; Received: from rlpowell by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SnxV3-0000X8-LY for lojban@googlegroups.com; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 12:50:33 -0700 Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 12:50:33 -0700 From: Robin Lee Powell To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: jbonunsla 2012: Post #2 Message-ID: <20120708195033.GY3566@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban@googlegroups.com References: <20120708071832.GU3566@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <4FF980BE.4020406@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4FF980BE.4020406@gmx.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Original-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 02:44:46PM +0200, selpa'i wrote: > coi If you don't mind, I'd like to comment on each point, knowing > well that a lot comes down to opinion: > > Am 08.07.2012 09:44, schrieb la .lindar.: > >>From my notes (brief summary to be expanded perhaps never): > > > >{tolcliva} is crap and you pretty much should never use it. > > How is it crap? Is this just your (sg.) opinion or did you (pl.) > come to an agreement about it? You gotta be more specific than > "it's crap, you can't use it". Both tolcliva and mo'u klama / > klamu'o have their place. tolcliva is a poor generic word for "arrive". > >Agree to disagree on (or attempt to deprecate, or just say 'fuck > >it' regarding) the weird vowel letterals. > > Some people don't like them, but I find them prettier than .a'y > .e'y .i'y .o'y .u'y. The obvious disadvantage is that .abu is two > words so zo can't quote it. Agreed on all points; lindar disagrees. > >Agree to disagree on whether time can be {clani} or {barda}. > > Time can be clani. Time has a dimension and anything with a > dimension can be long or short in that dimension. I disagree, as a matter of philosophy, that time has a dimension; this disagreement has nothing to do with Lojban as I've had it in English many times; we passed on it because of that fact (that it's not about Lojban). > >Kill with fire all of the 'by standard' places in favour of a BAI > >that does the same thing. > > I strongly disagree. There are a good number of "by standard" > places that are used a lot, and I don't want to use BAI to get > access to them. xamgu3 and dukse3 are two very common examples. Quite. > >Stuff we need to discuss tomorrow: > > One thing you might want to look at is how some gismu have built-in > jai while others don't. Some day, but probably not today. :) -Robin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.