stevo

On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 1:11 AM, la gleki <= ;gleki.is.m= y.name@gmail.com> wrote:

On Sunday, July 8, 2012 11:31:3= 0 PM UTC+4, aionys wrote:
I would prefer we didn't have another split, myself. We have Loglan, Lo= jban, Gua/Spi, Ithkuil, and possibly other much less known derivatives alre= ady. Every time someone decides to start a new lojbau, everyone suffers. An= d regardless of what problems your chosen lojbau is, it isn't perfect. = It never will be. Dividing our efforts just makes it so that the true goal = of all these languages- to be /spoken/ by /people/- will never be accomplis= hed.

The quest for perfection is a futile one. What we have with Lojban now = is good. Granted, it could be better, but that will always be true. It was = true of "LoCCan1", it's true of "LoCCan2", and it w= ill be true of "LoCCan34234234234". Starting over from scratch is= n't the solution. Yes, you may be able to make a new lojbau that doesn&= #39;t have the problems you perceive in "LoCCanN-1", but by makin= g it, you create a new divide.

If we want jbogugde to exist, if we want people to speak our language- = whichever one we decide on- then what we need to do is not to make a new on= e whenever we see problems. We need to either find an acceptable solution /= within/ our language, or we need to /deal with it/.

French is the third largest language on the internet. How many people d= o you think would bother to learn French if every region had their own, mut= ually incompatible dialects? Would English be nearly as pervasive as it is = if British, Australian, South African, and U.S. English speakers couldn'= ;t understand each other?

To quote a rather famous saying, "Divided we fall, united we stand= ". I view LoCCan3, and any other split, as the worst possible thing th= at could happen to us as a whole.

On Sun,= Jul 8, 2012 at 12:44 PM, la .lindar. <lindarthebard@gmail.com&g= t; wrote:

Curious...

Why not just m= ake it already?
Quit talking and just do it. >_>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com= /d/msg/lojban/-/w5Smfyps8F8J.

=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@goo= glegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/grou= p/lojban?hl=3Den.

--
mu'o mi= 'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.l= uk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. = :D )

pe'isai For me proposals lik= e xorxes's proposal for connectives are acceptable.
pe'is= ai=A0And Rosta's is not (mere relexing is even less acceptable). But I&= #39;ll study it anyway if ey publishes it.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com= /d/msg/lojban/-/qM7QZfsDSj0J.

=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.