Received: from mail-wg0-f61.google.com ([74.125.82.61]:39748)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCNuStaWoDxDxg_L_BBoEIvHT9A@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1Sog5A-0003KH-Sz; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:26:55 -0700
Received: by wgbdt10 with SMTP id dt10sf202693wgb.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:26:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:message-id:date:from:user-agent
         :mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=J9TuhJxFgWgFCgSCVV4hD3YYoo8QEZ0NW4o4lWO+ODI=;
        b=Y2VX0gYIHMrHgRyXOyrTawVJVAaZbcL6vI0c6DzrlCUumf+CWKi9lYNXC0yc0/+PQN
         CqS78En2mNgP/uP88qoYKCPzEw4ECWvfJi+nI9L8CtV6smBmpd+f9At3g2p+2vmmCy5/
         XtyLWuLdMRAUZFitTfZvPEe/tDfQ+s658gDOE=
Received: by 10.180.96.129 with SMTP id ds1mr33280wib.2.1341948401470;
        Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:26:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.14.37.139 with SMTP id y11ls1179283eea.4.gmail; Tue, 10 Jul
 2012 12:26:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.14.22.10 with SMTP id s10mr5774552ees.5.1341948399833;
        Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:26:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.14.22.10 with SMTP id s10mr5774551ees.5.1341948399812;
        Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:26:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ey0-f172.google.com (mail-ey0-f172.google.com [209.85.215.172])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d2si1122175eei.1.2012.07.10.12.26.39
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:26:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.172 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.215.172;
Received: by mail-ey0-f172.google.com with SMTP id q13so135289eaa.31
        for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:26:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.14.94.139 with SMTP id n11mr11234872eef.86.1341948399563;
        Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:26:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.101] (cpc2-pres4-0-0-cust1921.pres.cable.virginmedia.com. [80.192.151.130])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z16sm45267425eef.16.2012.07.10.12.26.37
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:26:38 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4FFC81EB.2060502@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 20:26:35 +0100
From: And Rosta <and.rosta@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.28) Gecko/20120306 Thunderbird/3.1.20
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Is there any demand for LoCCan3?
References: <90a7e54c-42fe-4ee0-9693-8155db9a7646@googlegroups.com> <fabefe4c-80e6-4502-99d4-ea1facf33e24@googlegroups.com> <9aee28ed-4b47-4f34-a377-92e8c3a33bdc@googlegroups.com> <4FFC7C3C.8090705@gmail.com> <CALm==BWkVGYs9OaMPXa=Y=CTtfohKJnNZn-6qSW7566VOXNMZg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALm==BWkVGYs9OaMPXa=Y=CTtfohKJnNZn-6qSW7566VOXNMZg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Original-Sender: and.rosta@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.172 as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=and.rosta@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

Co-filled argument places are argument-places that have the same value, e.g=
. in "Fx & Gx", the sole argument places of F and of G are co-filled. Lojba=
n avoids the verbosity of filling every place by giving speakers the option=
 of not encoding it (and implicitly or explicitly filling the place with zo=
'e). I googled "categorical dual", but couldn't see any relevance to this d=
iscussion.

.arpis., On 10/07/2012 20:14:
> What the heck is a "co-filled argument place" and does it have anything t=
o do with a categorical dual?
>
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:02 PM, And Rosta <and.rosta@gmail.com <mailto:a=
nd.rosta@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     la gleki, On 09/07/2012 06:08:
>
>
>
>         On Sunday, July 8, 2012 10:44:50 PM UTC+4, la .lindar. wrote:
>
>              Curious...
>
>              Why not just make it already?
>              Quit talking and just do it. >_>
>
>
>         Indeed. And Rosta, please present something.
>
>
>     Alas, Gleki, it is on my list of projects, but with relatively low pr=
iority on that list. Specifically, there are two relevant projects: one is =
an essay describing a possible solution to the core problem of loglangs (na=
mely, representation of co-filled argument places); the other is an essay d=
escribing a modular approach to the creation of a logical language. The sec=
ond is not stunningly original, but might serve to frame and focus any coll=
aborative effort that ever emerges. As for the first, I'm not convinced the=
 solution is processable by the human language faculty, and the problem may=
 instead remain unsolved; I suppose publishing it might spur others to seek=
 better solutions, but shortage of time for publishing one's projects is th=
e bane of my life.
>
>     I could sit down and jot down in an email a sketch of something paten=
tly better as a loglang than Lojban, but the only worthwhile loglang is the=
 one that cracks that fundamental problem of ergonomically representing co-=
filled argument places; without that, any other incremental improvement to =
Lojban has lost its appeal to me.
>
>     --And.
>
>
>     --
>     You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gr=
oups "lojban" group.
>     To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com <mailto:=
lojban@googlegroups.com>.
>     To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@ goo=
glegroups.com <mailto:lojban%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com>.
>     For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/ group=
/lojban?hl=3Den <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den>.
>
>
>
>
> --
> mu'o mi'e .arpis.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups=
 "lojban" group.
> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegr=
oups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojb=
an?hl=3Den.

--=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou=
ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban=
?hl=3Den.