Received: from mail-gg0-f189.google.com ([209.85.161.189]:45996) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SpM57-0001AT-RC; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 09:17:43 -0700 Received: by ggke5 with SMTP id e5sf2756744ggk.16 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 09:17:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-yahoo-newman-property:x-yahoo-newman-id :x-ymail-osg:x-mailer:references:message-id:date:from:reply-to :subject:to:in-reply-to:mime-version:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=mH0jTLB2vtdypT4eEaWeNqNTg1cw/pl3/Ea1oRHTFY8=; b=jaQI4ZPWCoCaXeKBEHNvrdysZgJV8KWLwRI2EY5IYLo9+MO0dR7b9pPTKPbOI1trC3 U8t11tnoZ1qYTXZuIpOAbduOTds/we8wbPBh8EjiomiylI0V6Ugp2VGAlsV+Ab+5WfxZ 5LeYCVJtOBt5IXcwEZfaWP8ZBdimheNUR9lsA= Received: by 10.68.194.230 with SMTP id hz6mr368991pbc.4.1342109847246; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 09:17:27 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.68.226.132 with SMTP id rs4ls5865656pbc.6.gmail; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 09:17:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.241.162 with SMTP id wj2mr2852796pbc.2.1342109845624; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 09:17:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.241.162 with SMTP id wj2mr2852794pbc.2.1342109845569; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 09:17:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nm13.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com (nm13.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com. [98.139.91.83]) by gmr-mx.google.com with SMTP id vj10si287827pbc.0.2012.07.12.09.17.25; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 09:17:25 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 98.139.91.83 as permitted sender) client-ip=98.139.91.83; Received: from [98.139.91.66] by nm13.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Jul 2012 16:17:25 -0000 Received: from [68.142.200.227] by tm6.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Jul 2012 16:17:25 -0000 Received: from [66.94.237.102] by t8.bullet.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Jul 2012 16:17:25 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1007.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Jul 2012 16:17:25 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 61648.58876.bm@omp1007.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 84265 invoked by uid 60001); 12 Jul 2012 16:17:24 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: 1Akv3I8VM1m6I7KiSEbWSEGbO96NFEa70__q7uyFaO4.xBo 2Pzb5Q35bQuXEw.AeTQtrc81kzstRxvt2UUWTvEyaUs.H7DAQeOJBgOytE5h k4mBCZrScCEfltR6b9vInyH_nuSyUyH8dbF.PAe9Q8chY6rCjO1zkbe_QOe2 7BOSTRH4_f7cXTHXxBX_JiW8wEU0FgIneeW4T_SaIC5Aenx0EYjIxS2B9hGJ s9RInOX9tJRALnqAabyqDBviOT_pMBQYGJdiw3BTsZ2vGxYlA0z9.7kNq4Gh hc3zMCJugDJyypb6NlsWFQin3RNkr75CxNG0ID42JvKhCTgZ9lpRiiMAkKHX zKGTvzScgY2Nf..uo5MPFzymiUByMH8EskvjRLx1j9aQt043bl9ux21OEycH gap.fP3IdLuoVGhYimpRixgpfwS8v9aqAZUwMetLuAa8uraWqGzZNnv_e_XP A.buSPZXrqdo41aReWz1m9_7eyY_GNF22LNxDydltstzbpe15hjK06bM2lsz I1aI- Received: from [99.92.108.194] by web184407.mail.bf1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 09:17:24 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.120.356233 References: <90a7e54c-42fe-4ee0-9693-8155db9a7646@googlegroups.com> <4FFDC7C8.2010707@gmail.com> <237c4ac5-64f3-40fa-81d3-8a97c76dcc5d@googlegroups.com> Message-ID: <1342109844.79789.YahooMailNeo@web184407.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 09:17:24 -0700 (PDT) From: John E Clifford Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: [lojban] &Lang (was: Is there any demand for LoCCan3?) To: "lojban@googlegroups.com" In-Reply-To: <237c4ac5-64f3-40fa-81d3-8a97c76dcc5d@googlegroups.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: kali9putra@yahoo.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 98.139.91.83 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kali9putra@yahoo.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@yahoo.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="992089038-436590181-1342109844=:79789" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --992089038-436590181-1342109844=:79789 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable As far as I can figure from the limited information, &'s language differs f= rom Logjam in two significant respects. 1. Instead of a predicate with various arguments dripping from it, the core= utterance is an argument (topic, say) with dangling predicates (comments -= - not the standard usage quite but Logjam is not famous for following prece= dents in terminology). This is a feasible structure, easily realized in two= (and simply in three) dimensions, without anaphora.=A0 The case of existen= tial graphs and general topological considerations, however, suggest that a= naphora will be needed in one-dimensional speech.=A0 The usual problems wit= h that are simplified by the canonical location of topics.=A0 Multiple topi= cs increase the complexity of this but not its basic simplicity.=A0 Comment= s come and go (naturally) while topics run on and on (and so are always ava= ilable for connection). 2.=A0 Comments have no inherent places, which need to be filled implicitly = when not explicitly, but have only those which are explicitly filled.=A0 Th= is means, apparently, that the nature of the connection of a comment to its= topic has to be specified in (almost) every case, an added nuisance in spe= ech but probably a simplification in learning (and possible a reduction in = the need for compounds, many of which are just to add a place to an existin= g predicate or rearrange those places).=A0 The bareness of comments means t= hat comment words can be raised to topics directly to do business as proper= ties or events, without a lot of extra detail.=A0=20 These points are too sketchy to give any notion of the relative size, ease = or clarity of an &lang as here conceived, but at least it looks feasible so= far. ________________________________ --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den. --992089038-436590181-1342109844=:79789 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
As far as = I can figure from the limited information, &'s language differs from Lo= gjam in two significant respects.
1. Instead of a pred= icate with various arguments dripping from it, the core utterance is an arg= ument (topic, say) with dangling predicates (comments -- not the standard u= sage quite but Logjam is not famous for following precedents in terminology= ). This is a feasible structure, easily realized in two (and simply in thre= e) dimensions, without anaphora.  The case of existential graphs and g= eneral topological considerations, however, suggest that anaphora will be n= eeded in one-dimensional speech.  The usual problems with that are sim= plified by the canonical location of topics.  Multiple topics increase= the complexity of this but not its basic simplicity.  Comments come and go (naturally) while topics run on and on (and so are always avai= lable for connection).
2.  Comments have no inherent places,= which need to be filled implicitly when not explicitly, but have only thos= e which are explicitly filled.  This means, apparently, that the natur= e of the connection of a comment to its topic has to be specified in (almos= t) every case, an added nuisance in speech but probably a simplification in= learning (and possible a reduction in the need for compounds, many of whic= h are just to add a place to an existing predicate or rearrange those place= s).  The bareness of comments means that comment words can be raised t= o topics directly to do business as properties or events, without a lot of = extra detail. 
These points are too sketchy to give any= notion of the relative size, ease or clarity of an &lang as here conce= ived, but at least it looks feasible so far.



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--992089038-436590181-1342109844=:79789--