Received: from mail-vb0-f61.google.com ([209.85.212.61]:55235) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SpRCJ-0004OP-Sq; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:45:28 -0700 Received: by vbzb23 with SMTP id b23sf3002624vbz.16 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:45:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=KCp0kIaOsfInHtdOUXBZDFOcNagKMOS2z1edBMCqdcw=; b=F4frpEsxlkyxRNE5d/o2EFcuk33q7LEQE3zw1W6H51NmcbbEVJBx9T4BeRwx8dNDrw q2VS1SKlsYhF6b8a/31fm6Aeu4yUkJKqQmZBHE2/yQnWMJcQUNIDKUmKV8InlQCR10Ot JkN03d0+OTObMWxZQYT9qGpMe6oj8veBTyeNQ= Received: by 10.52.174.167 with SMTP id bt7mr3093339vdc.15.1342129513396; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:45:13 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.52.69.174 with SMTP id f14ls1472519vdu.2.gmail; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:45:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.75.161 with SMTP id d1mr44188070vdw.2.1342129512815; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:45:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.75.161 with SMTP id d1mr44188069vdw.2.1342129512803; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:45:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vc0-f175.google.com (mail-vc0-f175.google.com [209.85.220.175]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y4si273995vds.2.2012.07.12.14.45.12 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:45:12 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of nictytan@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.175 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.220.175; Received: by vcbfy27 with SMTP id fy27so1438761vcb.34 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:45:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.108.1 with SMTP id d1mr26330861vcp.19.1342129512600; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:45:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.24.193 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:44:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Jacob Errington Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 17:44:52 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Re=3A_=5Blojban=5D_lujvo_for_=22spelling=22=3F_=28was_Re=3A_=5Blojban=2D?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?beginners=5D_How_do_you_write_=22Eyjafjallaj=F6kull=22=3F_=28a_sentence?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_from_tatoeba=29=29?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: nictytan@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of nictytan@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.175 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=nictytan@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / On 12 July 2012 17:39, Jonathan Jones wrote: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Jacob Errington wro= te: >> >> On 12 July 2012 15:20, Jonathan Jones wrote: >> > For one thing, you don't want to be using me'o at all. Spelling isn't >> > math. >> > >> Actually, {me'o} is just fine. How else are you supposed to say "I >> write the letter 'b'," if not by using {.i mi ciska me'o by.} ({mi >> ciska by} is out of the question, because by is anaphoric) ? > > > That's not "I write the letter "b". me'o by. is the VARIABLE b. > Then could you tell me how to say it? Also, I have better than good reason to believe that it's NOT the variable b, given the definition of me'o which I'd assumed you'd know: "me'o =3D the mathematical expression (unevaluated); convert unevaluated mathematical expression to sumti." What is the unevaluated expression "2+2" ? I think it's "2+2". That leads me to believe that the unevaluated expression "b" is "b", even if b has the value, say, 4, in which case its evaluated expression is "4" and not "b". mu'o mi'e la tsani >> >> > The only way I know of to spell a word without using ce'o between each >> > letter is with lo'u ... le'u: >> > >> Using lo'u .. le'u just amounts to a shorthand for {ce'o}, yes. The >> problem is that if told you {ko ciska lo'u ci ra ki ba na ku te le'u} >> I'd expect "ci ra ki ba na ku te" to be on the ciska3, not something >> else. By extension, I'd expect "by a bu ky ny i bu" to be on the >> ciska3 if I said {.i ko ciska lo'u by abu ky ny ibu le'u}. >> >> > lo'u by. .abu ry. dy. .abu le'u tadji lonu ciska lu barda li'u >> > >> That suffers from more than one problem, because I'd figure that only >> abstractions (or descriptions referring to abstractions, of course) >> could be tadji1. A list cannot be a method; that just doesn't make >> sense (my answer would be uanai). >> >> Again, I suggest using something involving probably LAhE, porsi, and >> lerfu: {vu'i me'o by abu ky ny ibu lerfu porsi fi vu'i zo bakni}. >> The rationale behind using vu'i on a quote is that if the quote is a >> word-quote, the (only?) logical sequence that vu'i can return is a >> list of letters. I'd suppose that vu'i on a grammatical-text quote >> returns the list of words. (I differentiate grammatical text quotes >> from multi-word quotes, but I won't get into that.) >> The justification for using a sequence in porsi3, which is of type >> [set] (assuming places are typed, which is what I believe) is that all >> sequences are also sets (the sequence type inherits all the properties >> of the set type). >> Using {vu'i me'o by abu ky ny ibu} is *perhaps* not a good solution >> (albeit certainly understandable). Maybe, a better solution would be >> the much longer {me'o by ce'o me'o abu ce'o me'o ky ce'o me'o ny ce'o >> me'o ibu} which *presumably* parses in the PEG and probably not in >> jbofi'e, but I'd never expect anyone to *ever* say that, *ever*. >> >> mu'o mi'e la tsani >> >> >> > >> > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Felipe Gon=E7alves Assis >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> I think we should have a lujvo for the relationship between a word an= d >> >> its spelling. >> >> Its definition could be >> >> "x1 is a spelling of word x2." >> >> >> >> Currently, my best attempt at expressing that in lojban is >> >> {ko'e valsi fi'o lerfu porsi ko'a}, >> >> inspired by iesk (more ideas below). Am I missing a better possibilit= y? >> >> >> >> My current idea for a veljvo is {valsi ke lerfu porsi}, giving >> >> {vlakemlerpoi} >> >> ({vlalerpoi} being possibly a string of letters (as opposed to other >> >> letterals)). >> >> >> >> An important thing to consider is how the spelling would be expressed= . >> >> The >> >> straightforward representation of a {ce'o}-sequence of individual >> >> letterals >> >> would give things like {me'o .e bu ce'o me'o .ybu li'o}, and these >> >> {ce'o >> >> me'o} >> >> are distracting. CLL 17.2 suggests lerfu strings for the purpose of >> >> spelling. >> >> I guess we could define the terjvo to be something like {me'o .ebu .y= bu >> >> li'o}. >> >> >> >> What do you think? Any suggestions? >> >> >> >> mu'o >> >> mi'e .asiz. >> >> >> >> On 3 July 2012 11:46, gleki wrote: >> >> > Tried translating this one and failed. >> >> > actually means > >> > spell >> >> > "Eyjafjallaj=F6kull"?> or > >> > "Eyjafjallaj=F6kull"> >> >> > Any ideas? >> >> > >> >> >> >> On 3 July 2012 12:16, Jonathan Jones wrote: >> >> > ma tadji lonu ciska zo'oi.Eyjafjallaj=F6kull. >> >> > >> >> > Or without using "experimental" cmavo: >> >> > >> >> > ma tadji lonu ciska zoi by. Eyjafjallaj=F6kull .by >> >> >> >> On 3 July 2012 17:47, iesk wrote: >> >> > .i .u'i ki'a xu zoi zoi. Eyjafjallaj=F6kull .zoi se ciska fi'o za'e >> >> > lerfyporsi >> >> > .e bu ce'o .y bu ce'o jy. ce'o .a bu ce'o fy. ce'o jy. ce'o .a bu >> >> > ce'o >> >> > ly. >> >> > ce'o ly. ce'o .a bu ce'o jy. ce'o tei .o bu relmoc. bu foi ce'o ky. >> >> > ce'o >> >> > .u >> >> > bu ce'o ly. ce'o ly. >> >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> >> Groups >> >> "lojban" group. >> >> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> >> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> >> For more options, visit this group at >> >> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den. >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > mu'o mi'e .aionys. >> > >> > .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >> > (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >> > >> > >> > -- >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> > Groups >> > "lojban" group. >> > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> > For more options, visit this group at >> > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group= s >> "lojban" group. >> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den. >> > > > > -- > mu'o mi'e .aionys. > > .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o > (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.