Received: from mail-bk0-f61.google.com ([209.85.214.61]:47570) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SpSvx-0005Oy-G1; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 16:36:43 -0700 Received: by bkwj4 with SMTP id j4sf1740877bkw.16 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 16:36:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=7N+xFHvwvYYig39cnT4yTimyE+vk7Ubzj9afKUGEpBQ=; b=BWE7l2DB+KHGayRePEtpvUVSqubSoDJ25m65etkR70U/qWr9qqeermL/wUWvLRJmZe k+tRHeaSO0Y9n43iPkYF55Utbn18G+rxRoN6+eRz5dMuI/VBMygulhGcvEhQg1wxgWiD vdDwKriLE9HfFUW6p0vruC2Iuqa0WWER3NOUc= Received: by 10.204.10.67 with SMTP id o3mr5950bko.34.1342136185515; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 16:36:25 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.130.131 with SMTP id t3ls2427761bks.9.gmail; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 16:36:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.154.76 with SMTP id n12mr23054bkw.1.1342136183742; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 16:36:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.154.76 with SMTP id n12mr23053bkw.1.1342136183717; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 16:36:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lb0-f180.google.com (mail-lb0-f180.google.com [209.85.217.180]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e23si1527412bks.0.2012.07.12.16.36.23 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 12 Jul 2012 16:36:23 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.180 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.217.180; Received: by lbbgj3 with SMTP id gj3so5789188lbb.39 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 16:36:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.39.135 with SMTP id p7mr2007004lbk.78.1342136183294; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 16:36:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.46.36 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 16:36:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 17:36:23 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Re=3A_=5Blojban=5D_lujvo_for_=22spelling=22=3F_=28was_Re=3A_=5Blojban=2D?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?beginners=5D_How_do_you_write_=22Eyjafjallaj=F6kull=22=3F_=28a_sentence?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_from_tatoeba=29=29?= From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.180 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=485b390f7a76720a1504c4aa6e37 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --485b390f7a76720a1504c4aa6e37 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Jacob Errington wrote: > On 12 July 2012 18:52, Jonathan Jones wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Jacob Errington > wrote: > >> Also, I have better than good reason to believe that it's NOT the > >> variable b, given the definition of me'o which I'd assumed you'd know: > >> "me'o = the mathematical expression (unevaluated); convert unevaluated > >> mathematical expression to sumti." > >> > >> What is the unevaluated expression "2+2" ? I think it's "2+2". That > >> leads me to believe that the unevaluated expression "b" is "b", even > >> if b has the value, say, 4, in which case its evaluated expression is > >> "4" and not "b". > > > > > > Yes, the unevaluated expression "b" is "b", however, it is the VARIABLE > "b", > > NOT the LETTER "b". We're talking about mathematics here. Math doesn't > have > > letters. It has constants, variables, and operations. Things REPRESENTED > by > > letters are VARIABLES. > > Sure, but what matters is the result, no? If I say "write the > unevaluated expression 'b'" and I get a "b" on a piece of paper, and > that's what I wanted to happen, then I've succeeded, haven't I? > I would say no, because a variable is a symbol which represents a numeric value, possibly unknown, most likely changing according to circumstances, even possibly imaginary, but a value nonetheless, whereas a letter represents a phoneme. While it is true that the symbols for both /can/ be the same, it is not true that they represent the same thing. Regardless of which, /you don't need to use me'o at all/. {.i ko ciska me'o by.} Means "You! write the mathematical expression 'b'." {.i ko ciska by.} means "You! write the letter 'b'." > Regardless, in a 100% lojbanic environment, the listener would just > write {by} on the paper if I told em/them/him/her {.i ko ciska me'o by > lo papri}. > In any environment where you told someone to write the variable b, they would would place a vertical line with a connecting closed loop at the bottom to the right. It's not a Lojbanic-specific thing. > Looking at the definition of {lerfu}, the gimste seems to suggest that > a letter can be referred to with {la'e zo BY}. Is it thus the case > that {la'e zo by ce'o abu ce'o...} (which is redundant to {la'e lo'u > by abu ... le'u}) is the correct way to give a letter list? > No. {zo} only quotes one word. It would either be {la'e zo by. ce'o lu .abu li'u ce'o ...} or possibly {la'e lu by. .abu ... li'u}. And I'm not saying either are "correct", except in a grammatical sense. > And, I think I should mention that you haven't answered my question. > How would you give a letter list? It's good and well to tell everyone > that they're wrong, but if you suggest no solutions, I'm afraid you're > only being unproductive. > I have answered your question. That you haven't seen it is not my fault. > mu'o mi'e la tsani > > > -- > > mu'o mi'e .aionys. > > > > .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o > > (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "lojban" group. > > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > > -- mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --485b390f7a76720a1504c4aa6e37 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Jacob Errington= <nictytan@gmail.com> wrote:
On 12 July 2012 18:52, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Jacob Errington <nictytan@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Also, I have better than good reason to believe that it's NOT = the
>> variable b, given the definition of me'o which I'd assumed= you'd know:
>> "me'o =3D the mathematical expression (unevaluated); conv= ert unevaluated
>> mathematical expression to sumti."
>>
>> What is the unevaluated expression "2+2" ? I think it= 9;s "2+2". That
>> leads me to believe that the unevaluated expression "b" = is "b", even
>> if b has the value, say, 4, in which case its evaluated expression= is
>> "4" and not "b".
>
>
> Yes, the unevaluated expression "b" is "b", howeve= r, it is the VARIABLE "b",
> NOT the LETTER "b". We're talking about mathematics here= . Math doesn't have
> letters. It has constants, variables, and operations. Things REPRESENT= ED by
> letters are VARIABLES.

Sure, but what matters is the result, no? If I say "write the unevaluated expression 'b'" and I get a "b" on a pie= ce of paper, and
that's what I wanted to happen, then I've succeeded, haven't I?=

I would say no, because a variable is a symbol wh= ich represents a numeric value, possibly unknown, most likely changing acco= rding to circumstances, even possibly imaginary, but a value nonetheless, w= hereas a letter represents a phoneme. While it is true that the symbols for= both /can/ be the same, it is not true that they represent the same thing.= Regardless of which, /you don't need to use me'o at all/. {.i ko c= iska me'o by.} Means "You! write the mathematical expression '= b'." {.i ko ciska by.} means "You! write the letter 'b= 9;."
=A0
Regardless, in a 100% lojbanic environment, the listener would just
write {by} on the paper if I told em/them/him/her {.i ko ciska me'o by<= br> lo papri}.

In any environment where you told someo= ne to write the variable b, they would would place a vertical line with a c= onnecting closed loop at the bottom to the right. It's not a Lojbanic-s= pecific thing.
=A0
Looking at the definition of {lerfu}, the gimste seems to suggest that
a letter can be referred to with {la'e zo BY}. Is it thus the case
that {la'e zo by ce'o abu ce'o...} (which is redundant to {la&#= 39;e lo'u
by abu ... le'u}) is the correct way to give a letter list?

No. {zo} only quotes one word. It would either be {la'e z= o by. ce'o lu .abu li'u ce'o ...} or possibly {la'e lu by. = .abu ... li'u}. And I'm not saying either are "correct", = except in a grammatical sense.
=A0
And, I think I should mention that you haven't answered my question. How would you give a letter list? It's good and well to tell everyone that they're wrong, but if you suggest no solutions, I'm afraid you= 're
only being unproductive.

I have answered your ques= tion. That you haven't seen it is not my fault.
=A0
mu'o mi'e la tsani

> --
> mu'o mi'e .aionys.
>
> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo= 'o
> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gro= ups
> "lojban" group.
> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> lojban+unsubs= cribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.




--
mu'o mi= 'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.l= uk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. = :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--485b390f7a76720a1504c4aa6e37--