Received: from mail-wi0-f189.google.com ([209.85.212.189]:61364) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SpVi3-0007AD-65; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 19:34:31 -0700 Received: by wibhr14 with SMTP id hr14sf77042wib.16 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 19:34:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=2mE5gt3fA7KoOKI6fSaOeDv3oXluWpKvkjbPo4T1pQY=; b=1MZ/TYUsuKwT9VD34kZdX+PZ1Y0BVd0QoImQYvriYcxJ8OWPopZS4TUFetKpKrG/Q5 AmE9b3P716KUGrEbc330r/O2yAvyD29k/71oY3I/Mw8+58rvnayHKPccWUZqw1poukQj JCrypB3AG4FJP6xkh4ysbfgCDLisSpYINbYlU= Received: by 10.204.153.214 with SMTP id l22mr22789bkw.3.1342146855451; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 19:34:15 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.205.119.129 with SMTP id fu1ls2443595bkc.4.gmail; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 19:34:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.151.213 with SMTP id d21mr63887bkw.0.1342146853502; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 19:34:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.151.213 with SMTP id d21mr63886bkw.0.1342146853442; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 19:34:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lb0-f175.google.com (mail-lb0-f175.google.com [209.85.217.175]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e23si1615652bks.0.2012.07.12.19.34.13 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 12 Jul 2012 19:34:13 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.175 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.217.175; Received: by mail-lb0-f175.google.com with SMTP id l5so4444310lbo.34 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 19:34:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.131.9 with SMTP id oi9mr529334lab.39.1342146853183; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 19:34:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.46.36 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 19:34:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 20:34:13 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Re=3A_=5Blojban=5D_lujvo_for_=22spelling=22=3F_=28was_Re=3A_=5Blojban=2D?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?beginners=5D_How_do_you_write_=22Eyjafjallaj=F6kull=22=3F_=28a_sentence?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_from_tatoeba=29=29?= From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.175 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d042c64776ba03704c4aceafb X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --f46d042c64776ba03704c4aceafb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Jacob Errington wrote: > On 12 July 2012 19:36, Jonathan Jones wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Jacob Errington > wrote: > >> > >> On 12 July 2012 18:52, Jonathan Jones wrote: > >> > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Jacob Errington > >> > wrote: > >> >> Also, I have better than good reason to believe that it's NOT the > >> >> variable b, given the definition of me'o which I'd assumed you'd > know: > >> >> "me'o = the mathematical expression (unevaluated); convert > unevaluated > >> >> mathematical expression to sumti." > >> >> > >> >> What is the unevaluated expression "2+2" ? I think it's "2+2". That > >> >> leads me to believe that the unevaluated expression "b" is "b", even > >> >> if b has the value, say, 4, in which case its evaluated expression is > >> >> "4" and not "b". > >> > > >> > > >> > Yes, the unevaluated expression "b" is "b", however, it is the > VARIABLE > >> > "b", > >> > NOT the LETTER "b". We're talking about mathematics here. Math doesn't > >> > have > >> > letters. It has constants, variables, and operations. Things > REPRESENTED > >> > by > >> > letters are VARIABLES. > >> > >> Sure, but what matters is the result, no? If I say "write the > >> unevaluated expression 'b'" and I get a "b" on a piece of paper, and > >> that's what I wanted to happen, then I've succeeded, haven't I? > > > > > > I would say no, because a variable is a symbol which represents a numeric > > value, possibly unknown, most likely changing according to circumstances, > > even possibly imaginary, but a value nonetheless, whereas a letter > > represents a phoneme. While it is true that the symbols for both /can/ be > > the same, it is not true that they represent the same thing. Regardless > of > > which, /you don't need to use me'o at all/. {.i ko ciska me'o by.} Means > > "You! write the mathematical expression 'b'." {.i ko ciska by.} means > "You! > > write the letter 'b'." > > > > I think that taking a look at the CLL might clear things up, as arpis > mentioned. > Chapter 17 section 10 example two clearly demonstrates use of me'o for > denoting letters. > Furthermore, pure use of quotations is definitely incorrect, as > evidenced in examples four and five. > > >> > >> Regardless, in a 100% lojbanic environment, the listener would just > >> write {by} on the paper if I told em/them/him/her {.i ko ciska me'o by > >> lo papri}. > > > > > > In any environment where you told someone to write the variable b, they > > would would place a vertical line with a connecting closed loop at the > > bottom to the right. It's not a Lojbanic-specific thing. > > > > You're wrong. I'm definitely not dreaming when I'm saying that the > variable b in Lojban is {by}. As you must already know, {b} by itself, > in Lojban, is a cmevla, and even though I'm stating what's blatantly > obvious here, cmevla are not "mathematical expressions" by ANY > stretch. > > >> > >> Looking at the definition of {lerfu}, the gimste seems to suggest that > >> a letter can be referred to with {la'e zo BY}. Is it thus the case > >> that {la'e zo by ce'o abu ce'o...} (which is redundant to {la'e lo'u > >> by abu ... le'u}) is the correct way to give a letter list? > > > > > > No. {zo} only quotes one word. It would either be {la'e zo by. ce'o lu > .abu > > li'u ce'o ...} or possibly {la'e lu by. .abu ... li'u}. And I'm not > saying > > either are "correct", except in a grammatical sense. > > > I now notice that I forgot some {zo} (and lu..li'u). > I think you fail to understand my understanding of lo'u..le'u which > I'm almost certain I've explained: {lo'u by cy dy le'u} == {zo by ce'o > zo cy ce'o zo dy}. > No. lo'u ... le'u is not equivalent to a string of zo-quotes placed in a sequence using ce'o. It is equivalent to a single lu .. li'u qutoe, except that the internal contents only need to be in Lojban, they do not need to be grammatical. > Using {la'e lu abu by cy li'u} is wrong on a different level, because > inside a lu..li'u words INTERACT with each other, such that all those > BY (and ABU) compound to form one variable. > I fail to see how "the referent of 'b a r d a'" is wrong on /any/ level, but it's not a moot point, because I wasn't suggesting that it's the correct way to do things, but merely that it's GRAMMATICAL. > >> > >> And, I think I should mention that you haven't answered my question. > >> How would you give a letter list? It's good and well to tell everyone > >> that they're wrong, but if you suggest no solutions, I'm afraid you're > >> only being unproductive. > > > > > > I have answered your question. That you haven't seen it is not my fault. > > > If by "answered" you're that semantically incorrect use of {tadji}, > then no, you haven't answered it at all. You've told me my solutions > are no good, and I've thus made more. I have yet to see you > reciprocate that behaviour. > No, by answered I mean my responses to what you have said. > > >> > >> mu'o mi'e la tsani > >> > >> > -- > >> > mu'o mi'e .aionys. > >> > > >> > .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o > >> > (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) > >> > > >> > -- > >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >> > Groups > >> > "lojban" group. > >> > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > >> > For more options, visit this group at > >> > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > >> > >> -- > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > >> "lojban" group. > >> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > >> For more options, visit this group at > >> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > mu'o mi'e .aionys. > > > > .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o > > (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "lojban" group. > > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > > -- mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --f46d042c64776ba03704c4aceafb Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Jacob Errington= <nictytan@gmail.com> wrote:
On 12 July 2012 19:36, Jonathan Jon= es <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote= :
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Jacob Errington <nictytan@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 12 July 2012 18:52, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Jacob Errington <nictytan@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >> Also, I have better than good reason to believe that it&#= 39;s NOT the
>> >> variable b, given the definition of me'o which I'= d assumed you'd know:
>> >> "me'o =3D the mathematical expression (unevaluat= ed); convert unevaluated
>> >> mathematical expression to sumti."
>> >>
>> >> What is the unevaluated expression "2+2" ? I th= ink it's "2+2". That
>> >> leads me to believe that the unevaluated expression "= ;b" is "b", even
>> >> if b has the value, say, 4, in which case its evaluated e= xpression is
>> >> "4" and not "b".
>> >
>> >
>> > Yes, the unevaluated expression "b" is "b"= ;, however, it is the VARIABLE
>> > "b",
>> > NOT the LETTER "b". We're talking about mathema= tics here. Math doesn't
>> > have
>> > letters. It has constants, variables, and operations. Things = REPRESENTED
>> > by
>> > letters are VARIABLES.
>>
>> Sure, but what matters is the result, no? If I say "write the=
>> unevaluated expression 'b'" and I get a "b"= on a piece of paper, and
>> that's what I wanted to happen, then I've succeeded, haven= 't I?
>
>
> I would say no, because a variable is a symbol which represents a nume= ric
> value, possibly unknown, most likely changing according to circumstanc= es,
> even possibly imaginary, but a value nonetheless, whereas a letter
> represents a phoneme. While it is true that the symbols for both /can/= be
> the same, it is not true that they represent the same thing. Regardles= s of
> which, /you don't need to use me'o at all/. {.i ko ciska me= 9;o by.} Means
> "You! write the mathematical expression 'b'." {.i ko= ciska by.} means "You!
> write the letter 'b'."
>

I think that taking a look at the CLL might clear things up, as= arpis mentioned.
Chapter 17 section 10 example two clearly demonstrates use of me'o for<= br> denoting letters.
Furthermore, pure use of quotations is definitely incorrect, as
evidenced in examples four and five.

>>
>> Regardless, in a 100% lojbanic environment, the listener would jus= t
>> write {by} on the paper if I told em/them/him/her {.i ko ciska me&= #39;o by
>> lo papri}.
>
>
> In any environment where you told someone to write the variable b, the= y
> would would place a vertical line with a connecting closed loop at the=
> bottom to the right. It's not a Lojbanic-specific thing.
>

You're wrong. I'm definitely not dreaming when I'm saying= that the
variable b in Lojban is {by}. As you must already know, {b} by itself,
in Lojban, is a cmevla, and even though I'm stating what's blatantl= y
obvious here, cmevla are not "mathematical expressions" by ANY stretch.

>>
>> Looking at the definition of {lerfu}, the gimste seems to suggest = that
>> a letter can be referred to with {la'e zo BY}. Is it thus the = case
>> that {la'e zo by ce'o abu ce'o...} (which is redundant= to {la'e lo'u
>> by abu ... le'u}) is the correct way to give a letter list? >
>
> No. {zo} only quotes one word. It would either be {la'e zo by. ce&= #39;o lu .abu
> li'u ce'o ...} or possibly {la'e lu by. .abu ... li'u}= . And I'm not saying
> either are "correct", except in a grammatical sense.
>
I now notice that I forgot some {zo} (and lu..li'u).
I think you fail to understand my understanding of lo'u..le'u which=
I'm almost certain I've explained: {lo'u by cy dy le'u} =3D= =3D {zo by ce'o
zo cy ce'o zo dy}.

No. lo'u ... le'u i= s not equivalent to a string of zo-quotes placed in a sequence using ce'= ;o. It is equivalent to a single lu .. li'u qutoe, except that the inte= rnal contents only need to be in Lojban, they do not need to be grammatical= .
=A0
Using {la'e lu abu by cy li'u} is wrong on a different level, becau= se
inside a lu..li'u words INTERACT with each other, such that all those BY (and ABU) compound to form one variable.

I fail= to see how "the referent of 'b a r d a'" is wrong on /an= y/ level, but it's not a moot point, because I wasn't suggesting th= at it's the correct way to do things, but merely that it's GRAMMATI= CAL.
=A0
>>
>> And, I think I should mention that you haven't answered my que= stion.
>> How would you give a letter list? It's good and well to tell e= veryone
>> that they're wrong, but if you suggest no solutions, I'm a= fraid you're
>> only being unproductive.
>
>
> I have answered your question. That you haven't seen it is not my = fault.
>
If by "answered" you're that semantically incorrect use= of {tadji},
then no, you haven't answered it at all. You've told me my solution= s
are no good, and I've thus made more. I have yet to see you
reciprocate that behaviour.

No, by answered I mean= my responses to what you have said.

>>
>> mu'o mi'e la tsani
>>
>> > --
>> > mu'o mi'e .aionys.
>> >
>> > .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi pa= tfu do zo'o
>> > (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )
>> >
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the G= oogle
>> > Groups
>> > "lojban" group.
>> > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> > lojb= an+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
>> > For more options, visit this group at
>> > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google= Groups
>> "lojban" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> lojban+un= subscribe@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> mu'o mi'e .aionys.
>
> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo= 'o
> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gro= ups
> "lojban" group.
> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> lojban+unsubs= cribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.




--
mu'o mi= 'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.l= uk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. = :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--f46d042c64776ba03704c4aceafb--