Received: from mail-ee0-f61.google.com ([74.125.83.61]:47261) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SpW1k-0007NZ-4h; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 19:54:46 -0700 Received: by eeit10 with SMTP id t10sf676760eei.16 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 19:54:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=2mhhalGaccUQ89i41e6n7tXHkmrs8rrnbQuQzwE5lzs=; b=0gnCKVLwIOWMxRHo0Jmb2hpa58dSV/gI3y5PI+Lv2iaTRfDL1vhIKc9p91LoT1BHBP vBifwcl0woSHEepk6x3wlvliF/tYWDnzfFYpYzGDlvbX2vs+JDTcr4ae+zvjlU6o0zRt CJoLdPN5lBCquG5AmV+RKYkDsoN2nxxXdUmhg= Received: by 10.205.120.3 with SMTP id fw3mr21752bkc.11.1342148076213; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 19:54:36 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.4.74 with SMTP id 10ls2453353bkq.0.gmail; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 19:54:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.154.76 with SMTP id n12mr68170bkw.1.1342148074963; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 19:54:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.154.76 with SMTP id n12mr68169bkw.1.1342148074945; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 19:54:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lb0-f181.google.com (mail-lb0-f181.google.com [209.85.217.181]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p5si1625556bks.1.2012.07.12.19.54.34 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 12 Jul 2012 19:54:34 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.181 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.217.181; Received: by mail-lb0-f181.google.com with SMTP id gk8so4208047lbb.26 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 19:54:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.41.2 with SMTP id b2mr2277089lbl.58.1342148074717; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 19:54:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.46.36 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 19:54:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 20:54:34 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Re=3A_=5Blojban=5D_lujvo_for_=22spelling=22=3F_=28was_Re=3A_=5Blojban=2D?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?beginners=5D_How_do_you_write_=22Eyjafjallaj=F6kull=22=3F_=28a_sentence?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_from_tatoeba=29=29?= From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.181 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e0cb4efe2a283ac0ce04c4ad3378 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --e0cb4efe2a283ac0ce04c4ad3378 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Jacob Errington wrote: > On 12 July 2012 20:41, Jacob Errington wrote: > > If by "answered" you're referring to that semantically incorrect use of > {tadji}, > > then no, you haven't answered it at all. You've told me my solutions > > are no good, and I've thus made more. I have yet to see you > > reciprocate that behaviour. > Also, I've seen no opinion's as to the "semantic correctness" of using tadji besides your own. To date, no jbocertu has made a comment one way or the other. Until at least one of them does, I'm going to continue with the opinion that there is nothing wrong with using tadji to ask how to spell something. -- mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --e0cb4efe2a283ac0ce04c4ad3378 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Jacob Errington= <nictytan@gmail.com> wrote:
On 12 July 2012 20:41, Jacob Erring= ton <nictytan@gmail.com> wr= ote:
> If by "answered" you're referring to that se= mantically incorrect use of {tadji},
> then no, you haven't answered it at all. You'= ;ve told me my solutions
> are no good, and I've thus made more. I have yet to see you
> reciprocate that behaviour.

Also, I've seen no opinion's as to the "semantic correctne= ss" of using tadji besides your own. To date, no jbocertu has made a c= omment one way or the other. Until at least one of them does, I'm going= to continue with the opinion that there is nothing wrong with using tadji = to ask how to spell something.

--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo piln= o be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Lu= ke, I am your father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--e0cb4efe2a283ac0ce04c4ad3378--