Received: from mail-yx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.213.189]:39423) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SpWCP-0007TL-QQ; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 20:05:57 -0700 Received: by yenl13 with SMTP id l13sf3200889yen.16 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 20:05:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:message-id:date:from:user-agent :mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=Z2hX3V//x7JDeHyamzWjQ14V9quDHybHrPBxbAxtB18=; b=H2tef/EkdhUQoFZSxQT9JALW/2Z9HndL5ia7ud7VEhedmj8IOju+9mvneG6YKr+9i/ 0WFHh1D1X8IJ5BXIQ5SYdPKQonJRegKEqSAQX5vQITXdtE2NLsVIiKpdsg0xWfZsRtt5 QGGaOv/X5yjmlqzQLmst4uknZwh3ChwwmXuz0= Received: by 10.236.161.135 with SMTP id w7mr62273yhk.18.1342148739587; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 20:05:39 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.236.42.69 with SMTP id i45ls4602156yhb.3.gmail; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 20:05:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.73.131 with SMTP id v3mr1645769yhd.6.1342148739094; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 20:05:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.73.131 with SMTP id v3mr1645768yhd.6.1342148739082; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 20:05:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-gh0-f179.google.com (mail-gh0-f179.google.com [209.85.160.179]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q35si1905368yhe.6.2012.07.12.20.05.39 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 12 Jul 2012 20:05:39 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of celestialcognition@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.179 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.160.179; Received: by ghbg24 with SMTP id g24so2848767ghb.10 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 20:05:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.50.46.231 with SMTP id y7mr65039igm.21.1342148738742; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 20:05:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.1.103] (76-76-236-67.lisco.net. [76.76.236.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ay5sm520653igb.15.2012.07.12.20.05.37 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 12 Jul 2012 20:05:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FFF9080.5000800@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 22:05:36 -0500 From: vitci'i User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120615 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Gender, yet again. References: <4FFE5CB0.7050506@gmail.com> <41a043f3-4116-45ad-baab-730e89b69637@googlegroups.com> <4FFF61CF.9080807@gmail.com> <4FFF8D51.7070002@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: celestialcognition@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of celestialcognition@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.179 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=celestialcognition@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.6 X-Spam_score_int: -5 X-Spam_bar: / On 07/12/2012 09:56 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 8:52 PM, vitci'i wrote: > >>>>> How about: x1 is the internal subjective identity of x2 according to >>>>> x3 >>>>> >>>>> Thus {tu'a lo nanmu mi ceinse} would be "I'm male-gendered" (I'm >>>>> putting a tu'a in there because otherwise I feel like I'm saying >>>>> something more like {da poi nanmu zo'u da mi ceinse}, which doesn't >>>>> make sense.) and {tu'a lo tinbe mi ceinse} could be used for "I'm a >>>>> submissive" or {tu'a lo arxokuna mi mi ceinse} for "I self-identify >>>>> as a raccoon." (e.g. a furry). >>>> >>>> That's actually too *narrow* -- it doesn't allow us to talk about how we >>>> gender inanimate objects and each other. (E.g., , >>>> .) >>>> >>> >>> The use of "gender" in that context is different than >> self-identification; >>> it's targeting based on gender, and that's a tanru/lujvo. >> >> What would you tanru/lujvo together to convey that? sevzi is >> insufficient to distinguish gender identity from other kinds of >> self-identification (e.g. nationality/culture); klesi and le'e likewise. >> cinse is narrower, but as I've mentioned also means sexual orientation, >> and to distinguish which sense is meant we again need a word that means >> gender. >> >> (If we had a word for sex, gender could be constructed by lujvo as "sex >> stereotype". But we don't.) >> > > If you mean sex as in "having this particular sexual chromosome pair", we > have a lujvo for that: > jbepibnafei (Technically it's a fu'ivla.) I dislike long words for important concepts. And jbepibnafei doesn't specify chromosomes over (say) genitals; it's presumably most useful in cases where a clean gender binary is assumed, or where edge cases should be described in full. Anyway, I'm certainly not going to say {jbepibnafei ke kulnu xarlei ke'e sevzi} every time I want to talk about gender identity. If I had the power to rewrite cinse, gender identity would be {cinse'i}. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.