Received: from mail-pb0-f61.google.com ([209.85.160.61]:48276)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCKOXn8wTEOmmgIAFGgQAYHEc@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1Speut-0003sg-Pw; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 05:24:22 -0700
Received: by pbbro2 with SMTP id ro2sf3992163pbb.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 05:24:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject
         :mime-version:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results
         :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id
         :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe
         :list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=7sEE+1bENw7B1Nuf9xpMfLCZ1Yum4DeJUaLIE9Ziv68=;
        b=oS2C5uyIigfzaAoufA+dheE67ZshJae0TgYWaiqUoxpOzWN+et+PkB9A5s6SHOE0tF
         fFkleOC5iati9wtB+05fDUl9aAfpulcsPvc6h+cmg51oeeaZnLqpxExoc3+pErlAXxi1
         KH8E1nFhb+VHwCcXBz5IAKel6I65bDfEq03QU=
Received: by 10.52.71.7 with SMTP id q7mr25046vdu.20.1342182249393;
        Fri, 13 Jul 2012 05:24:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.52.75.106 with SMTP id b10ls1644866vdw.4.gmail; Fri, 13 Jul
 2012 05:24:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.155.207 with SMTP id vy15mr26609vdb.13.1342182248857;
        Fri, 13 Jul 2012 05:24:08 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 05:24:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Message-Id: <02034674-7252-4332-941f-824e4851ab33@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <5000060E.4040309@gmail.com>
References: <CAPAJj9+KgnetEWtOs4=bPZZrVyuP+RtN+F3CYnmQ_mFikctC0Q@mail.gmail.com> <154f0c35-3c07-4e3f-b041-576ec7580d82@googlegroups.com> <326a568c-1704-41c8-affd-e20f8a227767@googlegroups.com>
 <5000060E.4040309@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: a LoCCan3 discussion platform?
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of
 gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates internal as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com; dkim=pass
 header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_923_18491408.1342182248502"
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

------=_Part_923_18491408.1342182248502
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1



On Friday, July 13, 2012 3:27:10 PM UTC+4, And Rosta wrote:
>
> Gleki Arxokuna, On 13/07/2012 12:03: 
> >     On Friday, July 13, 2012 1:54:09 PM UTC+4, tijlan wrote: 
> >         Apparently some people have been giving much thought to the 
> >         potentiality of a next-generation logical language, which 
> include 
> >         myself even though I haven't taken part in the recent LoCCan3 
> >         conversation. The concept has at least intellectual merits and 
> may 
> >         deserve detailed examination & organization. That's perhaps 
> beyond the 
> >         scope of this mailing list, and the process might benefit from 
> inputs 
> >         from different existing conlang (& natlang) communities. 
> > 
> >         Is there a dedicated platform for such a process? Would you be 
> >         interested in having one? 
>
> There's the dormant jboske@yahoogroups.com, which would be appropriate if 
> this next generation language comes under the umbrella of the Loglan 
> project, and the dormant engelang@yahoogroups.com, for engelang 
> discussion in general. (Both lists are old, still functional, and owned by 
> me.) There's so much overlap between folk interested in engelangs and folk 
> interested in loglangs, that there wouldn't seem to be much point  in 
> starting a new loglang list. 
>
> > Oh. I just wanna invite everyone to this mailing list, not divert it 
> > from here. Ithkuil lovers, Esperanto speakers, Na'vi warriors, 
> > Klingon-speaking researchers of the universe 
>
> That is Conlang List, the forum for discussion of all sorts of invented 
> language (except for the sociopolitical aspect of international auxiliary 
> languages). 
>
Yes. which actually poses no interest for me if you wanna create 
naturalistic only lang. 
And there is nice conlangery.com podcast.

Lojban can be naturalistic too... but without any external help.
But I'm sure that Ithkuil can be discussed here too. There are not so many 
places where researchers can play with semantics and be creators at the 
same time. We must compare ithkuil's solutions with realisations in Lojban 
all the time, though. But non-artlangs and non-loglangs isn't worth 
discussing in most cases.

>
> --And. 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/LjcOLR2j53cJ.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.


------=_Part_923_18491408.1342182248502
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<br><br>On Friday, July 13, 2012 3:27:10 PM UTC+4, And Rosta wrote:<blockqu=
ote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin: 0;margin-left: 0.8ex;border-left=
: 1px #ccc solid;padding-left: 1ex;">Gleki Arxokuna, On 13/07/2012 12:03:
<br>&gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; On Friday, July 13, 2012 1:54:09 PM UTC+4, tijlan wr=
ote:
<br>&gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Apparently some people have been givin=
g much thought to the
<br>&gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; potentiality of a next-generation logi=
cal language, which include
<br>&gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; myself even though I haven't taken par=
t in the recent LoCCan3
<br>&gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; conversation. The concept has at least=
 intellectual merits and may
<br>&gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; deserve detailed examination &amp; org=
anization. That's perhaps beyond the
<br>&gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; scope of this mailing list, and the pr=
ocess might benefit from inputs
<br>&gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; from different existing conlang (&amp;=
 natlang) communities.
<br>&gt;
<br>&gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Is there a dedicated platform for such=
 a process? Would you be
<br>&gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; interested in having one?
<br>
<br>There's the dormant <a href=3D"mailto:jboske@yahoogroups.com" target=3D=
"_blank">jboske@yahoogroups.com</a>, which would be appropriate if this nex=
t generation language comes under the umbrella of the Loglan project, and t=
he dormant <a href=3D"mailto:engelang@yahoogroups.com" target=3D"_blank">en=
gelang@yahoogroups.com</a>, for engelang discussion in general. (Both lists=
 are old, still functional, and owned by me.) There's so much overlap betwe=
en folk interested in engelangs and folk interested in loglangs, that there=
 wouldn't seem to be much point &nbsp;in starting a new loglang list.
<br>
<br>&gt; Oh. I just wanna invite everyone to this mailing list, not divert =
it
<br>&gt; from here. Ithkuil lovers, Esperanto speakers, Na'vi warriors,
<br>&gt; Klingon-speaking researchers of the universe
<br>
<br>That is Conlang List, the forum for discussion of all sorts of invented=
 language (except for the sociopolitical aspect of international auxiliary =
languages).
<br></blockquote><div>Yes. which actually poses no interest for me if you w=
anna create naturalistic only lang.&nbsp;</div><div>And there is nice conla=
ngery.com podcast.</div><div><br></div><div>Lojban can be naturalistic too.=
.. but without any external help.</div><div>But I'm sure that Ithkuil can b=
e discussed here too. There are not so many places where researchers can pl=
ay with semantics and be creators at the same time. We must compare ithkuil=
's solutions with realisations in Lojban all the time, though. But non-artl=
angs and non-loglangs isn't worth discussing in most cases.</div><blockquot=
e class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin: 0;margin-left: 0.8ex;border-left: =
1px #ccc solid;padding-left: 1ex;"><br>--And.
<br></blockquote>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
lojban" group.<br />
To view this discussion on the web visit <a href=3D"https://groups.google.c=
om/d/msg/lojban/-/LjcOLR2j53cJ">https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/Lj=
cOLR2j53cJ</a>.<br />=20
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou=
ps.com.<br />

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban=
?hl=3Den.<br />



------=_Part_923_18491408.1342182248502--