Received: from mail-pb0-f61.google.com ([209.85.160.61]:50258) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Sphap-0006vT-NJ; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 08:15:54 -0700 Received: by pbbro2 with SMTP id ro2sf4160074pbb.16 for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 08:15:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=mOPVbA0Md8v7QbLMS18IdFsXXmGMnh9BvC4ZcLnm7W8=; b=zIhkscrDpKYhXaaaUtMpk7rvtuup5fD+TKSipp/fMXwMCwCVkyhragmyZovvn7/sXu mXoheKZ0woxdB7k/0ou6UX/sE/Wz6H10nFX2GQn4DwgTQVu2bV1/Hvn2BKSl1DF68Z1D bzqvTkKzPJ8xlo+C7N7ge/E8aHsoTKjMOrP4s= Received: by 10.68.232.230 with SMTP id tr6mr311749pbc.16.1342192537782; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 08:15:37 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.68.136.39 with SMTP id px7ls8673665pbb.1.gmail; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 08:15:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.135.101 with SMTP id pr5mr320007pbb.8.1342192536662; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 08:15:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 08:15:35 -0700 (PDT) From: djandus To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: <8ffd2928-910d-4818-8546-8c84e3678abe@googlegroups.com> Subject: [lojban] scalars and portion selbri MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: jandew@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jandew@gmail.com designates internal as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jandew@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_3_12055320.1342192535502" X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 1 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: So, I'm really hoping this is straightforward. A long time ago, I wanted to say to somepony, "I'm halfway there." The easy way out is {mi xadba klama} But then I tell myself, this is Lojban, we have scalar negation, we should have scalar progress be easy to express. As usual, at first I found nothing, but now I have too many options and no way to tell them apart anymore. [...] Content analysis details: (0.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (jandew[at]gmail.com) 0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is CUSTOM_MED -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 HTML_NONELEMENT_30_40 BODY: 30% to 40% of HTML elements are non-standard 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid ------=_Part_3_12055320.1342192535502 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 So, I'm really hoping this is straightforward. A long time ago, I wanted to say to somepony, "I'm halfway there." The easy way out is {mi xadba klama} But then I tell myself, this is Lojban, we have scalar negation, we should have scalar progress be easy to express. As usual, at first I found nothing, but now I have too many options and no way to tell them apart anymore. I get je'a, na'e, no'e, to'e. Those are cool. I don't expect them to be too useful here. However, it's probably a good idea to go ahead and tell me now if {je'a/no'e klama} makes any sense whatsoever. What the hay is va'e? si'e? seci'u? Which, if any, applies here? I have ideas for what they all mean, but the way they're defined altogether, especially the unaltered ci'e, confuse the hay out of me. (ciste doesn't mention scalar negation at all!) So you know, my ideal would be a nice, succinct way to plug any number into something, like {pi xa ji'i mu} to get "I'm about 65% there." Even better would be knowing how the hay to use all these other things. mu'o mi'e djos. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/4w1f6YTX2I0J. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. ------=_Part_3_12055320.1342192535502 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable So, I'm really hoping this is straightforward.

A long time ago, I wanted to say to somepony, "I'm halfway there."
The easy way out is {m= i xadba klama}

But then I tell myself, this is Loj= ban, we have scalar negation, we should have scalar progress be easy to exp= ress. As usual, at first I found nothing, but now I have too many opti= ons and no way to tell them apart anymore.

I get j= e'a, na'e, no'e, to'e. Those are cool. I don't expect them to be too useful= here. However, it's probably a good idea to go ahead and tell me now if {j= e'a/no'e klama} makes any sense whatsoever.

What the hay is va'e? si'e? seci'= u? Which, if any, applies here?
I have i= deas for what they all mean, but the way they're defined altogether, especi= ally the unaltered ci'e, confuse the hay out of me. (ciste doesn't mention scalar negation at all!)

So you know, my ideal would be a nice, = succinct way to plug any number into something, like {pi xa ji'i mu} to get= "I'm about 65% there." Even better would be knowing how the hay to use all these other things.
=

mu'o mi'e djos.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/4w= 1f6YTX2I0J.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
------=_Part_3_12055320.1342192535502--