Received: from mail-vc0-f189.google.com ([209.85.220.189]:54266) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SpiA8-00079R-6p; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 08:52:20 -0700 Received: by vcbfl10 with SMTP id fl10sf1952960vcb.16 for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 08:52:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:user-agent :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type:content-disposition; bh=Fu1/s4zJRIvnXuGtb46ZRMiPwEgjMEDP5KWZJDtv2/A=; b=a4qRm+J8YdrT7W7KZ9pBORUpBFxjmpjiBP5oOnFxWRCOUh4u4Ui0yPJfw78hOOBfGN wKk+V1uXECwSj249pLtLIlXNrKlN8f+Gwfai8NMUA+9mm6X8ElFxhrQ9LvjVlnmCMuHh VvWnOkfrym40P/ckShGcV3ZE64v4lkoWU4K6Q= Received: by 10.68.232.230 with SMTP id tr6mr345618pbc.16.1342194720234; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 08:52:00 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.68.229.8 with SMTP id sm8ls9425398pbc.0.gmail; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 08:51:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.241.162 with SMTP id wj2mr1822477pbc.2.1342194719694; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 08:51:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.241.162 with SMTP id wj2mr1822476pbc.2.1342194719676; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 08:51:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from stodi.digitalkingdom.org (mail.digitalkingdom.org. [173.13.139.236]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id vj10si518164pbc.0.2012.07.13.08.51.59 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 13 Jul 2012 08:51:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) client-ip=173.13.139.236; Received: from rlpowell by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Spi9u-00079M-7l for lojban@googlegroups.com; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 08:51:58 -0700 Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 08:51:58 -0700 From: Robin Lee Powell To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] scalars and portion selbri Message-ID: <20120713155157.GC23325@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban@googlegroups.com References: <8ffd2928-910d-4818-8546-8c84e3678abe@googlegroups.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8ffd2928-910d-4818-8546-8c84e3678abe@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Original-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 08:15:35AM -0700, djandus wrote: > So, I'm really hoping this is straightforward. > > A long time ago, I wanted to say to somepony, "I'm halfway there." > The easy way out is {mi xadba klama} > > But then I tell myself, this is Lojban, we have scalar negation, > we should have scalar progress be easy to express. As usual, at > first I found nothing, but now I have too many options and no way > to tell them apart anymore. > > I get je'a, na'e, no'e, to'e. Those are cool. I don't expect them > to be too useful here. However, it's probably a good idea to go > ahead and tell me now if {je'a/no'e klama} makes any sense > whatsoever. They look fine to me. > What the hay is va'e? ti noi ninmu cu so va'e lo ni mi gletu djica > si'e? ti pi mu si'e le titnanba .i pa va'e pu lo nu mi cliva .i ma zerle'a .i mi catra le'o sai > seci'u? xu le ni dikca cu barda se ci'u lo se xampo (that last maybe needs a ni before the se xampo?) > Which, if any, applies here? {lo nu mi klama cu pi mu si'e lo nu mulno} is one way I might render the original thought. You could very easily just drop the x2; it would be perfectly understandable (and the cu is almost certainly unnecessary). > I have ideas for what they all mean, but the way they're defined > altogether, especially the unaltered ci'e, confuse the hay out of > me. (ciste doesn't mention scalar negation at all!) http://vlasisku.lojban.org/vlasisku/ci'e 0.o I *guess* the idea was to have ci'e be something like "under conditions"? Maybe ask Bob? That's actually not too horrible, now that I think about it. > So you know, my ideal would be a nice, succinct way to plug any > number into something, like {pi xa ji'i mu} to get "I'm about 65% > there." Even better would be knowing how the hay to use all these > other things. I'm reasonably certain that si'e does what you want. -Robin -- http://singinst.org/ : Our last, best hope for a fantastic future. .i ko na cpedu lo nu stidi vau loi jbopre .i danfu lu na go'i li'u .e lu go'i li'u .i ji'a go'i lu na'e go'i li'u .e lu go'i na'i li'u .e lu no'e go'i li'u .e lu to'e go'i li'u .e lu lo mamta be do cu sofybakni li'u -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.