Received: from mail-vc0-f189.google.com ([209.85.220.189]:45331)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCJep1eqcEBCJ9YSABRoEyB0B8A@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1SpyZU-0005LX-4H; Sat, 14 Jul 2012 02:23:34 -0700
Received: by vcbfl10 with SMTP id fl10sf2698383vcb.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 14 Jul 2012 02:23:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:message-id:date:from:user-agent
         :mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=9D3IOBXyV+j8jlx8VnzJsLXLZ31/X+mxUb6OSCMr+Tw=;
        b=j8Jz9U8Y3B1/hF1iys0MMqIn2g0cwkmtrKRPknVdNfhuYBxJcp5fzHSwvibTdxnsn4
         YZ9kRSns6MShxXim/M/Z348LNSbxp3uSMk9iIg5eU+JW03c7YP1iewvB3Fz4w88X5DnV
         Zxr/f11dzaFw20uaUX8Z6xJaRBpl8D27TNqDM=
Received: by 10.50.149.234 with SMTP id ud10mr354585igb.4.1342257801404;
        Sat, 14 Jul 2012 02:23:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.231.49.81 with SMTP id u17ls4405456ibf.6.gmail; Sat, 14 Jul
 2012 02:23:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.50.195.199 with SMTP id ig7mr1781482igc.3.1342257799909;
        Sat, 14 Jul 2012 02:23:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.50.195.199 with SMTP id ig7mr1781480igc.3.1342257799899;
        Sat, 14 Jul 2012 02:23:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-f170.google.com (mail-ob0-f170.google.com [209.85.214.170])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id po8si1237751igc.1.2012.07.14.02.23.19
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Sat, 14 Jul 2012 02:23:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of celestialcognition@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.170 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.170;
Received: by mail-ob0-f170.google.com with SMTP id k16so7214910obf.29
        for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Sat, 14 Jul 2012 02:23:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.50.222.170 with SMTP id qn10mr1126762igc.45.1342257799746;
        Sat, 14 Jul 2012 02:23:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.103] (76-76-236-67.lisco.net. [76.76.236.67])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id pb3sm7538712igc.17.2012.07.14.02.23.19
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Sat, 14 Jul 2012 02:23:19 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <50013A86.40902@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 04:23:18 -0500
From: vitci'i <celestialcognition@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120615 Thunderbird/13.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Gender, yet again.
References: <4FFE5CB0.7050506@gmail.com> <41a043f3-4116-45ad-baab-730e89b69637@googlegroups.com> <CAMKwHj0pLeb7LhAMxea+mtPQL540LxPMqmrCXH-AaFCyEs=dDw@mail.gmail.com> <4FFF61CF.9080807@gmail.com> <CALm==BV3gMfX+uXj-zGbhQUZsZSrCCw6jz1wZEXPFDsr2rwuTw@mail.gmail.com> <4FFF8D51.7070002@gmail.com> <CAMKwHj2vD8+7aMDEcaYd9aF6O=mj76p6j9k4teYHgQr-XF5-4Q@mail.gmail.com> <4FFF9080.5000800@gmail.com> <CAMKwHj3TR6E4zMgBDP8BLVF00s1Oe3o8B7j=kODiYSSvnAnW7w@mail.gmail.com> <4FFFA544.5070404@gmail.com> <CAMKwHj1KY=QTmiV1sAGq_EpVw5MYAWnN6_31f6cK5FLNesT9Zg@mail.gmail.com> <4FFFAF56.7050901@gmail.com> <CAMKwHj2dH8wLdaaC6RGqQhegibxLgqWmP5NC5oOZS-6kWNh7dw@mail.gmail.com> <4FFFCCAD.5070809@gmail.com> <CAMKwHj2cQcLHS4RAe_gCbWHS7TqeG0jFfzgERv6aqfJW=x5gOA@mail.gmail.com> <5000966F.0@gmail.com> <CAMKwHj0RDF9aYxz2WNGPSOaHnAVBZS4_k4fy7L9q6mLTTeS8iQ@mail.gmail.com> <5000B735.6020605@gmail.com> <CAMKwHj1jNc-uUMOTPH4=ZFpV_xW1AEkoRpoUdm-AZjtdMCDRKw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMKwHj1jNc-uUMOTPH4=ZFpV_xW1AEkoRpoUdm-AZjtdMCDRKw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Original-Sender: celestialcognition@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of celestialcognition@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.170 as permitted
 sender) smtp.mail=celestialcognition@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

On 07/13/2012 09:00 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 6:03 PM, vitci'i
> <celestialcognition@gmail.com>wrote:
>> On 07/13/2012 04:57 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote:
>>> Stereotypes aren't imaginary. They're derogatory, insulting, and
>>> WRONG.
>> 
>> What's the difference between something that's imaginary and
>> something that's not true?
> 
> I will not be dragged into a philosophical debate.

I wasn't trying to be philosophical. Let me try again: would you please
clarify the nature of your objection to the construction "imaginary
category" to mean stereotype? It seems to me a fairly accurate description.


>>> Except that's not the way we do things. The meaning of the
>>> English
>> "gender"
>>> is so broad it covers /completely unrelated/ concepts.
>>> 
>>> There is nothing wrong with having a word in Lojban that covers a
>>> wide berth- that's what the intention of the gismu is, after
>>> all.
>>> 
>>> But we do /not/ have words that cover multiple concepts. That
>>> defeats the purpose of the language.
>> 
>> What set of words do you suggest?
> 
> As I've said previously, I don't consider any of the concepts
> important to /need/ a word, but I would suggest those of you that do
> to use the list John Clifford posted.

I think it's a bad idea to try to exhaustively list all the different
angles on this, because our idea of what the list contents should be is
likely to change. It would be better to have a single broad word that
captures what they have in common, and then tanru/lujvo down from there.


On 07/14/2012 12:23 AM, MorphemeAddict wrote:> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at
8:03 PM, vitci'i <celestialcognition@gmail.com>wrote:
> Many kinds of things can be not true without being imaginary:
> opinions, sentences, stereotypes,

Opinions and sentences are generally na'e jetnu, neither true nor false
(though sentences often express propositions that are true or false).
Stereotypes, on the other hand, are generally to'e jetnu, factually
incorrect.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.