Received: from mail-gg0-f189.google.com ([209.85.161.189]:48517) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Sq6j8-00016u-MY; Sat, 14 Jul 2012 11:06:03 -0700 Received: by ggke5 with SMTP id e5sf5005004ggk.16 for ; Sat, 14 Jul 2012 11:05:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=wop9NP/L8VJiH1IRl0CWxSPOMB6e6a1v8vPjAWiCG38=; b=CCK4W32hitJSZfmLXndexEaQCJ37xdn0++OQXKHuK3p9mamTOv+Ki8bJnWsSZx9+a5 7mzFJnegIEAjAYoahV3sXirjsEKYzIJj+qWKLeo+Zz/XBGQd230lc2gdE5tRLraKl+cT uBtpH9CMpP8WhwgBzBv46Tyb+hnbDKv9jaQwY= Received: by 10.52.20.51 with SMTP id k19mr426687vde.8.1342289152337; Sat, 14 Jul 2012 11:05:52 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.52.66.242 with SMTP id i18ls2281296vdt.5.gmail; Sat, 14 Jul 2012 11:05:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.19.110 with SMTP id d14mr445840vde.10.1342289151204; Sat, 14 Jul 2012 11:05:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 11:05:50 -0700 (PDT) From: djandus To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: <805435a6-8817-438e-8c80-f293d99e7b87@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: References: <8ffd2928-910d-4818-8546-8c84e3678abe@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: [lojban] scalars and portion selbri MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: jandew@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jandew@gmail.com designates internal as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jandew@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1987_29411838.1342289150740" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_1987_29411838.1342289150740 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thank you for the thorough responses! On Friday, July 13, 2012 11:16:25 AM UTC-5, tsani wrote: > > #2 {mi klama jai fi'ucisi'e [lo mu'e klama]} > {jai} confuses me still about 60% of the times I see it. Could you explain this usage a bit more? > > Using si'e implies *time* I'd say, because these MOI cmavo don't know > of the natural implications of "going" such as distance travelled, > etc. > This makes sense, for si'e comparing {lo nu}s to be comparing the temporal dimension. I'd even go as far as to say the subjectivity of time is implied -- that is, if I were to give the comparison, I'd be saying that I think of one event as half of the other event in some way. That would be first assumed to be in my own conception of the length of time, and if that made no sense, then some other dimension could be looked to. > > #4 {la'e lo nu caba'o klama cu fi'uresi'e la'e lo mu'e klama} > what on earth are you trying to do here? ({la'e} only confuses me 20% of the time nowadays) > > We can possibly use {ni} to get a > "natural-ish-useful-context-dependent-measure-comparable-thing" thanks > to No One Understands ni (tm): > #5 {lo ni caba'o klama cu fi'uresi'e la'e lo mu'e klama} > Oh, celestia. Please never do this. I like {ni}, and this seems like abuse. It would be referring to an amount of traveling, sure, but there's {ve klama} sitting right there... What {ni} would be *good* for is if it needed to be explicit as to what scale was to be used. (time/space/length/etc) I'd totally approve of that. > > #6 {mi jai fi'u re si'e co ni klama xy} "I'm halfway to X." > Yeah, aforementioned "I don't get {jai}" -- help? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/XHvgpZmXBWkJ. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. ------=_Part_1987_29411838.1342289150740 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thank you for the thorough responses!

On Friday, J= uly 13, 2012 11:16:25 AM UTC-5, tsani wrote:
#2 {mi klama jai fi'ucisi'e [lo mu'e klama]}
{jai} confuses me still about 60% of the times I see = it. Could you explain this usage a bit more? 

Using si'e implies *time* I'd say, because these MOI cmavo don't know
of the natural implications of "going" such as distance travelled,
etc.
This makes sense, for si'e comparing {lo nu}s= to be comparing the temporal dimension. I'd even go as far as to say the s= ubjectivity of time is implied -- that is, if I were to give the comparison= , I'd be saying that I think of one event as half of the other event in som= e way. That would be first assumed to be in my own conception of the length= of time, and if that made no sense, then some other dimension could be loo= ked to. 

#4 {la'e lo nu caba'o klama cu fi'uresi'e la'e lo mu'e klama}
what on earth are you trying to do here?
({= la'e} only confuses me 20% of the time nowadays) 

We can possibly use {ni} to get a
"natural-ish-useful-context-dependent-measure-comparable-thin= g" thanks
to No One Understands ni (tm):
#5 {lo ni caba'o klama cu fi'uresi'e la'e lo mu'e klama}
Oh, celestia. Please never do this. I like {ni}, and this seems like abuse. It would = be referring to an amount of traveling, sure, but there's {ve klama} sittin= g right there...

What {ni} would be <= i>good for is if it needed to be explicit as to what scale was to = be used. (time/space/length/etc) I'd totally approve of that.

#6 {mi jai fi'u re si'e co ni klama xy} "I'm halfway to X."
Yeah, aforementioned "I don't get {jai}" -- help?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/XH= vgpZmXBWkJ.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
------=_Part_1987_29411838.1342289150740--