Received: from mail-pb0-f61.google.com ([209.85.160.61]:47547)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCMGclZyxExCygaGABRoEiO0VYQ@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1SruKB-0000no-K3; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 10:15:43 -0700
Received: by pbbro2 with SMTP id ro2sf3489384pbb.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 10:15:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=NwuEaCN3R4Jooplj4zWbcIlhEshc4qxTH0sSDWavQ2s=;
        b=3gQDgwb4MdZpV5Jmfe1u10hJX7oT9jfZvHAs77FnR/xybO1DDdJVFS2GQP2ufLTLXg
         eGKdCYoG3ceJ78NQ2DzZ0EFrZ9zIkQ+wV300ftb6mv6cey+PaFZYrVKOpoNNJ+M/TYOQ
         5yhbDOmDKMq9y3qRMYlfCyZpzymy7AiKG6SqI=
Received: by 10.236.201.134 with SMTP id b6mr601796yho.15.1342718130294;
        Thu, 19 Jul 2012 10:15:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.236.121.34 with SMTP id q22ls5717682yhh.7.gmail; Thu, 19 Jul
 2012 10:15:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.236.182.138 with SMTP id o10mr1356733yhm.13.1342718129547;
        Thu, 19 Jul 2012 10:15:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.236.182.138 with SMTP id o10mr1356732yhm.13.1342718129535;
        Thu, 19 Jul 2012 10:15:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gg0-f170.google.com (mail-gg0-f170.google.com [209.85.161.170])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q4si250353ano.0.2012.07.19.10.15.29
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Thu, 19 Jul 2012 10:15:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of escaaape@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.170 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.161.170;
Received: by mail-gg0-f170.google.com with SMTP id f2so5583226ggn.1
        for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 10:15:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.216.202 with SMTP id os10mr6093605igc.17.1342718129322;
 Thu, 19 Jul 2012 10:15:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.15.74 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 10:15:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <fc1fd25d-a1ca-41fa-8cdf-a9317d8f83b9@googlegroups.com>
References: <fc1fd25d-a1ca-41fa-8cdf-a9317d8f83b9@googlegroups.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 19:15:29 +0200
Message-ID: <CAGO2uONRgVuhrgxxPUhqv-f3kfMKpX==-uN7zu0UpS+RWJsDPQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] May Lojban be considered as an ideal language philosophy?
From: Escape Landsome <escaaape@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: escaaape@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of escaaape@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.170 as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=escaaape@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

If Lojban language is the ideal philosophical language, this is so in
the sense of the former Wittgenstein, who is logicist.

The later Wittgenstein is rather anti-logicist, so by the same kind of
argument, Lojban is the opposite of the ideal philosophical language.

It can be hold, for philosophical or even scientific reasons, that
metaphors are useful in thought expression : see Langacker, Lakoff,
and all hermeneuts.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.