Received: from mail-yw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.213.61]:41072)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCJep1eqcEBCSoqeABRoESLT7mQ@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1SsKzI-00020W-ER; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 14:43:58 -0700
Received: by yhoo21 with SMTP id o21sf4855137yho.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 14:43:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:message-id:date:from:user-agent
         :mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=9kyi0hL5s+WGJsqLv/FULpbkWFCMP3yQMwJ6JHWDseQ=;
        b=Uk81pkFgIwwSuzTpO7DtniWkFha7e8j6ok1asD/iYYKtaMRSpGkh2QKY5lfhr/Hk6X
         qyIWJVDzd4zeakUv8/EwUNYKjD8boKwamfuP2Vd8nBjc15Pj+mVY/gqGrNZ28EgeXYvK
         kObCHEauH6Wl3vXe7V3kPt28nlc/6oMuGddYE=
Received: by 10.236.146.72 with SMTP id q48mr1974107yhj.17.1342820626041;
        Fri, 20 Jul 2012 14:43:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.236.149.34 with SMTP id w22ls8750292yhj.8.gmail; Fri, 20 Jul
 2012 14:43:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.236.185.33 with SMTP id t21mr3561262yhm.41.1342820624602;
        Fri, 20 Jul 2012 14:43:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.236.185.33 with SMTP id t21mr3561261yhm.41.1342820624588;
        Fri, 20 Jul 2012 14:43:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yx0-f179.google.com (mail-yx0-f179.google.com [209.85.213.179])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f27si598643anj.1.2012.07.20.14.43.44
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Fri, 20 Jul 2012 14:43:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of celestialcognition@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.179 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.213.179;
Received: by yenr13 with SMTP id r13so4036414yen.10
        for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 14:43:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.50.156.196 with SMTP id wg4mr5590490igb.54.1342820624313;
        Fri, 20 Jul 2012 14:43:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.103] (76-76-236-67.lisco.net. [76.76.236.67])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z8sm20372544igi.5.2012.07.20.14.43.43
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Fri, 20 Jul 2012 14:43:43 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5009D10D.6030204@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 16:43:41 -0500
From: vitci'i <celestialcognition@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Re=3A_=5Blojban=5D_Re=3A_lujvo_for_=22spelling=22=3F_=28was_Re=3A_=5Bloj?=
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?ban=2Dbeginners=5D_How_do_you_write_=22Eyjafjallaj=F6kull=22=3F_=28a_sent?=
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?ence_from_tatoeba=29=29?=
References: <CALMa68oLAfRSeFNJtMeegKGARjFUoptomS0j9gu2qFQfofxZzw@mail.gmail.com> <1b8bb927-a69e-4fc1-a85d-97c4203b751d@googlegroups.com> <5009A007.2030107@gmail.com> <CAMKwHj0f-56BESc-6fTwGbsFebLZ5syw65C0WWAU7vXCEoSr8g@mail.gmail.com> <5009C826.2090108@gmail.com> <CAMKwHj3Zq8wgsQ=+Mv91yRofpGD8=HO1tM-MWWB9Au6EdZrBXg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMKwHj3Zq8wgsQ=+Mv91yRofpGD8=HO1tM-MWWB9Au6EdZrBXg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Original-Sender: celestialcognition@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of celestialcognition@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.179 as permitted
 sender) smtp.mail=celestialcognition@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

If I understand correctly, then:
{zoi .ler. by ry .obu dy .abu .ler. cu lerpoi fi zo broda}

On 07/20/2012 04:17 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote:
> That definition has 0 votes and therefore doesn't count.
> 
> Quoting a previous message in this thread:
> 
> {vlale'u} doesn't seem useful, but both {vlakemlerpoi} and {lerpoi} do.
>> My proposed definitions of lerpoi and vlakemlerpoi:
>>
>> #1a .i lo ka lerpoi cu ka ce'u noi fa'ugi lu'a ke'a gi lu'o ke'a lerfu
>> ce'u fa'u zi'o zi'o fa'u ce'u cu porsi zi'o zi'o
>> "x1 is a character string (sequence of letters) in character set x2
>> representing x3."
>> porsi2 and porsi3 seem irrelevant. The fa'u-hackage is required,
>> because individually the letters-digits-symbols are a part of the
>> character set, but as a sequence or mass, aren't. However,
>> individually, they don't represent anything, but as a mass, they do.
>> The definition can be given with a termset rather than the non-logical
>> connective {fa'u}:
>> #1b .i lo ka lerpoi cu ka ce'u noi nu'i ge lu'a ke'a ce'u zi'o nu'u gi
>> lu'o ke'a zi'o ce'u lerfu cu porsi zi'o zi'o
>>
>> (for simplicity's sake, I'm not going to give the full gismu-deep
>> structure of vlakemlerpoi)
>> #2 .i lo ka vlakemlerpoi cu ka ce'u lerpoi ce'u ce'u noi ke'a valsi ce'u
>> ce'u
>> "x1 is a string in character set x3 representing word x3 meaning x4 in
>> language x5."
>> or "x1 is the spelling of x3."
>>
>> mu'o mi'e la tsani
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 3:05 PM, vitci'i <celestialcognition@gmail.com>wrote:
> 
>> jbovlaste's definition for lerpoi doesn't seem to have a place for the
>> word formed by the sequence of letters. I have to repeat iesk's question.
>>
>> On 07/20/2012 01:24 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote:
>>> The consensus is on lerpoi.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:14 PM, vitci'i <celestialcognition@gmail.com
>>> wrote:
>>>> I can't find it on vlasisku. I'd like to nominate {lerfu mifra} for
>>>> veljvo. (cf. lertermifra, character encoding.)
>>>>
>>>> On 07/20/2012 01:04 PM, iesk wrote:
>>>>> I'm sorry if I missed it, but ... *how do* I say '"broda" is spelt bee,
>>>>> ar, o, dee, a." in Lojban?
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "lojban" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
>>
>>
> 
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.