Received: from mail-qa0-f61.google.com ([209.85.216.61]:54206) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1StJWa-0006uH-Ko; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 07:22:26 -0700 Received: by qadb10 with SMTP id b10sf3763959qad.16 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 07:22:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=r1RYRi9DmD4Io3kYa45uZJjmI1FMqWMELqHHxcuRg84=; b=OUoq98KNhh4MiAZ7mKfYJQNz1sJfgmVP2t19scnv1tW7BfwxQMbimKnUpamYpttoEK GueXAEuMq0fYUKKB8IY4hOK5rbxlicvr9XsippgrOQBBauoqRK1D5v4Va1AJSEF1DHaP Jcm9h3xb8jtw0ZARGc1IsTzR4u3xfTZu8L+mA= Received: by 10.52.34.9 with SMTP id v9mr1369457vdi.9.1343053329714; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 07:22:09 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.52.35.202 with SMTP id k10ls3412974vdj.0.gmail; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 07:22:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.184.73 with SMTP id cj9mr9167202qab.6.1343053329039; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 07:22:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.184.73 with SMTP id cj9mr9167184qab.6.1343053328871; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 07:22:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qc0-f174.google.com (mail-qc0-f174.google.com [209.85.216.174]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k34si2455028qcz.1.2012.07.23.07.22.08 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 23 Jul 2012 07:22:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.174 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.216.174; Received: by mail-qc0-f174.google.com with SMTP id o28so3343681qcr.5 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 07:22:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.182.136 with SMTP id cc8mr24714421qab.60.1343053328752; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 07:22:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.39.211 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 07:22:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <500D58DA.7040107@gmx.de> References: <4FF1B1FB.7010605@gmx.de> <4FF31027.7010608@gmx.de> <4FF32BCD.7050608@gmx.de> <4FF34B59.6060005@gmx.de> <4FFF49EE.1070207@gmx.de> <500D51B8.3020006@gmx.de> <500D58DA.7040107@gmx.de> Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 10:22:08 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] la snime blabi From: Michael Turniansky To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: mturniansky@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.174 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=mturniansky@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf30363d3f931f4604c57ff852 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --20cf30363d3f931f4604c57ff852 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 9:59 AM, selpa'i wrote: > Am 23.07.2012 15:48, schrieb Michael Turniansky: > > "lu doi ga'i nai noltruni'u do vi mlerai > .i ku'i la snime blabi ne ti'a lo cmana > zi'e ne bu'u lo ze torcrida > cu mlemau fo lo pilji be li ki'o" > > How could the queen be at the same time most beautiful and > Snow White yet more beautiful? (Well, of course, the answer is dependent > on what the se mlerai is. If we presume it was the same as the queen's > question (lo ro se gugde), the Snow White must perforce not be in that set, > so she is not a member of that country's peoples. ;-) ) (Actually, the > more accurate response would be "...do vi mlerai da'a lo se go'i....", but > I'm not inclined to split hairs (yeah, right!) > > > .u'i. That would destroy the effect the original has. They are obviously > not in the same set. The mirror knows this and says "You are the prettiest > of the people around here (implicit), but Snow White exceeds you". The > mirror uses two sets because it is necessary to distinguish or else it > loses the effect / parallelism to the original. > > lo jbogu'e cu jai bu'u ta'e ralci tcila lanli .i mi na se spaji > > > But, actually, I don't think I've ever seen an (English) version of the story where the mirror's response at this point in the story is that the queen is the fairest/prettiest. Usually that she is fair, but Snow is fairer by far. So even those authors recognize the mirror can't use the superlative regarding the queen. --gejyspa -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --20cf30363d3f931f4604c57ff852 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
=A0 I

On Mon, Jul 23, 20= 12 at 9:59 AM, selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de> wrote:
=20 =20 =20
Am 23.07.2012 15:48, schrieb Michael Turniansky:
"lu doi ga'i nai noltruni'u do vi mlerai
.i ku'i la snime blabi ne ti'a lo cmana
zi'e ne bu'u lo ze torcrida
cu mlemau fo lo pilji be li ki'o"

=A0 How could the queen be at the same time most beautiful and Snow=A0White=A0yet more beautiful? =A0(Well, of course, the answer is dependent on what the se mlerai is. =A0If we presume it was the same as the queen's question (lo ro se gugde), the Snow White must perforce not be in that set, so she is not a member of that country's peoples. ;-) ) =A0(Actually, the more accurate response would be "...do= vi mlerai da'a lo se go'i....", but I'm not inc= lined to split hairs (yeah, right!)

.u'i. That would destroy the effect the original has. They are obviously not in the same set. The mirror knows this and says "Y= ou are the prettiest of the people around here (implicit), but Snow White exceeds you". The mirror uses two sets because it is necessary to distinguish or else it loses the effect / parallelism to the original.

lo jbogu'e cu jai bu'u ta'e ralci tcila lanli .i mi na se= spaji


=A0 But,= actually, I don't think I've ever seen an (English) version of the= story where the mirror's response at this point in the story is that t= he queen is the fairest/prettiest. =A0Usually that she is fair, but Snow is= fairer by far. =A0So even those authors recognize the mirror can't use= the=A0superlative=A0regarding the queen.

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 --gejyspa

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--20cf30363d3f931f4604c57ff852--