Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f61.google.com ([209.85.215.61]:43223)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCMHEmaCOBhCS4riABRoEbD8sWg@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1StXZq-0005KF-Sl; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 22:22:46 -0700
Received: by laai10 with SMTP id i10sf385004laa.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 22:22:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=3AeYeechwVV+Z2cGgPUoTmx9TD29TYD19vWAKwpOq+Y=;
        b=UfgieUO3hWZm7qNC9qnj2OqF7AEc8VUvIpqpi72ojzP2nlif30ukx8d+2i25hqTAUv
         Mjm4dEOjozPiaQgblZHAcxPe6JzainCNvx6VHfjv10ryKowkcCbwxI7ckj19CUhN4lZW
         jSLKvLtID3pFT0TQVo/99B4AS2X+pEmLzAxCw=
Received: by 10.204.129.7 with SMTP id m7mr804587bks.17.1343107346430;
        Mon, 23 Jul 2012 22:22:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.204.129.214 with SMTP id p22ls7406315bks.7.gmail; Mon, 23 Jul
 2012 22:21:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.130.7 with SMTP id q7mr3878832bks.2.1343107314983;
        Mon, 23 Jul 2012 22:21:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.130.7 with SMTP id q7mr3878830bks.2.1343107314961;
        Mon, 23 Jul 2012 22:21:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com [209.85.217.182])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j4si4224503bkj.3.2012.07.23.22.21.54
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Mon, 23 Jul 2012 22:21:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.182 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.217.182;
Received: by lbon10 with SMTP id n10so8372385lbo.41
        for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 22:21:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.112.99.71 with SMTP id eo7mr9327519lbb.84.1343107314475; Mon,
 23 Jul 2012 22:21:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.152.46.36 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 22:21:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2abfa90c-6902-4f2c-9ebb-3afa9f7c87b8@googlegroups.com>
References: <2abfa90c-6902-4f2c-9ebb-3afa9f7c87b8@googlegroups.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 23:21:54 -0600
Message-ID: <CAMKwHj1KYyHCW-BvBu_XKY3Hv0mr1+e9UYQYC75KTiCPXy8mzA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Loglandic N-paradigm. Is it worthy of examination?
From: Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.182 as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04016a235fe18304c58c8ad1
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

--f46d04016a235fe18304c58c8ad1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com
> wrote:

> After the two languages split Loglan introduced optional case tags.
> It states that each sumti place can be assigned to a separate class, and
> no two sumti in any brivla can have sumti places that belong to the same
> class.
> It probably aims at being easy to use, that is you should probably have no
> problems in choosing what case tag (i.e. preposition) to use for refering
> to any sumti.
>
> http://loglan.org/Paradigms/paradigm_n.html
>
> Some of them like /jui/ for instance just reminds me of lojbanic {mau}
> (the problem with "than" in gismu definitions that was probably solved in
> Lojban).
> In my opinion /dio/ leads to some language-specific metaphors (beneficiary
> being kinda destination).
>

I'm sorry, is this something like the BAI? Otherwise I don't get it.


> But on the other hand, don't recent (and actually eternal) suggestions to
> remove some frequent sumti places suggest something similar?
>

I know of no suggestions to remove frequent sumti places. Perhaps you meant
INfrequent, as in the places that are rarely if ever used, and usually have
a BAI equivalent s well?

--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.


--f46d04016a235fe18304c58c8ad1
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Gleki Arxokuna=
 <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com" target=
=3D"_blank">gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote=
 class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc soli=
d;padding-left:1ex">
After the two languages split Loglan introduced optional case tags.<div>It =
states that each sumti place can be assigned to a separate class, and no tw=
o sumti in any brivla can have sumti places that belong to the same class.<=
/div>
<div>It probably aims at being easy to use, that is you should probably hav=
e no problems in choosing what case tag (i.e. preposition) to use for refer=
ing to any sumti.</div><div><br></div><div><a href=3D"http://loglan.org/Par=
adigms/paradigm_n.html" target=3D"_blank">http://loglan.org/Paradigms/parad=
igm_n.html</a>=A0<br>
</div><div><br></div><div>Some of them like /jui/ for instance just reminds=
 me of lojbanic {mau} (the problem=A0with &quot;than&quot;=A0in gismu defin=
itions that was probably solved in Lojban).</div><div>In my opinion /dio/ l=
eads to some language-specific metaphors (beneficiary being kinda destinati=
on).</div>
</blockquote><div><br>I&#39;m sorry, is this something like the BAI? Otherw=
ise I don&#39;t get it.<br>=A0</div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=
=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div></d=
iv>
<div>But on the other hand, don&#39;t recent (and actually eternal) suggest=
ions to remove some frequent sumti places suggest something similar?</div><=
span class=3D"HOEnZb"><font color=3D"#888888"></font></span></blockquote><b=
r>
I know of no suggestions to remove frequent sumti places. Perhaps you meant=
 INfrequent, as in the places that are rarely if ever used, and usually hav=
e a BAI equivalent s well?<br><br>--<br>mu&#39;o mi&#39;e .aionys.<br><br>
.i.e&#39;ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo&#39;=
o<br>(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )<br>
</div>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
lojban" group.<br />
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou=
ps.com.<br />

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban=
?hl=3Den.<br />



--f46d04016a235fe18304c58c8ad1--