Received: from mail-yw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.213.61]:38959) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Suf46-0007FF-1f; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 00:34:38 -0700 Received: by yhoo21 with SMTP id o21sf3261854yho.16 for ; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 00:34:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=NqgZqtCns9M9/6SUu+H26WG9htw1O7xvPNxxOiojev0=; b=oxi6IzpV9DkAYuAsXi5u/rkJ8B6LrB3DBXDfAWZt0hB7HhHZp5gu1idEr0CbMHpkgy YWzSCbN8dXpS2HG1D0o24KR77lhR/Qj0xTSAt7QKpUsh2Gkl4EhrU5ijGsuKYY/taREM zauLV8lUCgGDEl7gGRfQy5WmEPsPES+uasYvU= Received: by 10.52.174.167 with SMTP id bt7mr103658vdc.15.1343374459464; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 00:34:19 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.52.75.106 with SMTP id b10ls1945794vdw.4.gmail; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 00:34:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.67.71 with SMTP id l7mr107080vdt.12.1343374458877; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 00:34:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 00:34:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Gleki Arxokuna To: lojban@googlegroups.com Cc: John E Clifford Message-Id: <31c02864-1f1a-48b3-9175-dc53ed9b78bc@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: <1343321077.32346.YahooMailNeo@web184405.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> References: <201207231411.12437.phma@phma.optus.nu> <9d078b36-1814-40f9-9d8a-e54face9d102@googlegroups.com> <50102B21.4020200@gmx.de> <50114048.2000009@gmx.de> <1343321077.32346.YahooMailNeo@web184405.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: It's Greek to me MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates internal as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_3_14434912.1343374458011" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_3_14434912.1343374458011 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I must change my viewpoint a bit. When attitudinals or BAI are used don't they clearly state that it's a metaphor in the speaker's mind? And one more general question. Is it possible to speak without metaphors at all? There can be objects or phenomena that show features that are between two gismu definitions Like homeomorphism of a mug and a torus. If you slowly change the shape you'll get {kabri} out of {djine}. So where djine ends and kabri starts? On Thursday, July 26, 2012 8:44:37 PM UTC+4, clifford wrote: > > As usual for English, the "It's all Greek to me" gets its boost from > Shakespeare (Julius Caesar in the discussion about JC thrice refusing the > crown), but during various situations other versions have been popular: > "It's all Dutch to me", "You might as well be talking Hottentot" and so > on. The Shakespeare case has originally an anti-elitist component, too > (couldn't use plain old Latin, could he), which furthers the plot. But the > general pattern of blaming incomprehension on known of but unintelligible > language is pretty general. Ithkuil (I'm never sure I spell it right) > certainly qualifies. But, of course, successful metaphors rely on common > cultural ties and -- despite the widespread pattern -- these may be lacking > here. The hearer may not know about Ithkuil or of it fabled (but real) > complexity or may not recognize that what is being talked about is clearly > NOT a specimen of Ithkuil (there was a cartoon once of a person confronted > with some classic Greek inscription and dismissing it by saying it is all > Greek to him). We can, of course, mark the usage as non-literal and force > another (but what other?) reading. But that really does go against the > whole idea of a metaphor and makes Lojban out to be the kind of narrow, > literal, robotic language that external critics take it to be (even Spock > had a sense of humor, though a rather elusive one). > > ------------------------------ > *From:* selpa'i > *To:* lojban@googlegroups.com > *Sent:* Thursday, July 26, 2012 8:04 AM > *Subject:* Re: [lojban] Re: It's Greek to me > > Am 26.07.2012 06:58, schrieb Gleki Arxokuna: > > I understood the joke. pe'i metaphorical expressions are possible in > Lojban but must be clearly defined > > to prevent culture-specific misunderstanding. > > If you define a metaphor that way, it's not really a metaphor anymore. You > only get the full effect if .itkuil means the language and then say things > like {xu di'u .itkuile} to express your confusion. Of course metaphors are > fine, and when they are not obvious, you can mark them with pe'a. > > > In the Netherlands and Russia they say "It's Chinese to me" in such > situations. > > In Germany, people say "das kommt mir spanisch vor" = "this seems spanish > to me" to exress not-understanding or that something is odd. Using foreign > languages in such metaphors is common all over the planet, so using .itkuil > (or any other non-lojban language, even though the comical effect is > greater with .itkuil, it being another conlang and known for its > complexity) will do the job. Again, use pe'a or zo'o when you aren't sure > people will get it. > > mu'o mi'e la selpa'i > > -- pilno zo le xu .i lo dei bangu cu se cmene zo lojbo .e nai zo lejbo > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+ > unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/sYE5YQkf6WsJ. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. ------=_Part_3_14434912.1343374458011 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I must change my viewpoint a bit. When attitudinals or BAI are used don't t= hey clearly state that it's a metaphor in the speaker's mind?
And one m= ore general question.
Is it possible to speak without metaphors a= t all?
There can be objects or phenomena that show features that = are between two gismu definitions
Like homeomorphism of a mug and a torus. If you slow= ly change the shape you'll get {kabri} out of {djine}. So where djine ends =  and kabri starts?

On Thursday, July 26, 2012 8:44:37 PM UTC+4,= clifford wrote:
As usual for English, the "It's all = Greek to me" gets its boost from Shakespeare (Julius Caesar in the discussion about JC thrice refusing the cr= own), but during various situations other versions have been popular: "It's= all Dutch to me", "You might as well be talking Hottentot" and so on. = ; The Shakespeare case has originally an anti-elitist component, too (could= n't use plain old Latin, could he), which furthers the plot.  But the = general pattern of blaming incomprehension on known of but unintelligible l= anguage is pretty general.  Ithkuil (I'm never sure I spell it right) = certainly qualifies.  But, of course, successful metaphors rely on com= mon cultural ties and -- despite the widespread pattern -- these may be lac= king here.  The hearer may not know about Ithkuil or of it fabled (but real) complexity or may not recognize t= hat what is being talked about is clearly NOT a specimen of Ithkuil (there = was a cartoon once of a person confronted with some classic Greek inscripti= on and dismissing it by saying it is all Greek to him).  We can, of co= urse, mark the usage as non-literal and force another (but what other?) rea= ding.  But that really does go against the whole idea of a metaphor an= d makes Lojban out to be the kind of narrow, literal, robotic language that= external critics take it to be (even Spock had a sense of humor, though a = rather elusive one).


From: selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de= >
To: lojban@googlegroups.com <= br> Sent: Thursday, July 26,= 2012 8:04 AM
Subject: R= e: [lojban] Re: It's Greek to me

Am 26.07.2012 06:58, schrieb Gleki Arxokuna:
> I understood the joke.= pe'i metaphorical expressions are possible in Lojban but must be clearly d= efined
> to prevent culture-specific misunderstanding.

If you = define a metaphor that way, it's not really a metaphor anymore. You only ge= t the full effect if .itkuil means the language and then say things like {x= u di'u .itkuile} to express your confusion. Of course metaphors are fine, a= nd when they are not obvious, you can mark them with pe'a.

> In t= he Netherlands and Russia they say "It's Chinese to me" in such situations.=

In Germany, people say "das kommt mir spanisch vor" =3D "this seems= spanish to me" to exress not-understanding or that something is odd. Using= foreign languages in such metaphors is common all over the planet, so usin= g .itkuil (or any other non-lojban language, even though the comical effect= is greater with .itkuil, it being another conlang and known for its complexity) will do the job. Again, use pe'a or zo'o when you aren't sure = people will get it.

mu'o mi'e la selpa'i

-- pilno zo le xu .i= lo dei bangu cu se cmene zo lojbo .e nai zo lejbo

-- You received t= his message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.=
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe f= rom this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For m= ore options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/sY= E5YQkf6WsJ.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
------=_Part_3_14434912.1343374458011--