Received: from mail-gh0-f189.google.com ([209.85.160.189]:40033)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCNf8pM-bDBDQmtmABRoE3xmgYg@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1Svlqh-0002rv-Q9; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 02:01:20 -0700
Received: by ghbf16 with SMTP id f16sf6270174ghb.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 02:01:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=wAtqSNsm3NdJ9e6ClCMYE/MriPJb6Sm/ofRvS7AUvcs=;
        b=OY+fHnMdtiv6thS7L6bJBqUu1tCRWD0634yAB9NfUyB7ggdMz3pkFD3Sp1PvHv5MYL
         U8llJNLBugJytZWiTZmuFTxnKY0p16vutF0iLeZzbljL1qeXJmoVMza1fsJ2544kGAOg
         IzPQQivIf8quNfVY6jIfhszRadybPUmaPM+rA=
Received: by 10.52.95.238 with SMTP id dn14mr826185vdb.1.1343638864883;
        Mon, 30 Jul 2012 02:01:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.52.88.68 with SMTP id be4ls3424701vdb.3.gmail; Mon, 30 Jul
 2012 02:01:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.24.68 with SMTP id s4mr14652101vdf.3.1343638864084;
        Mon, 30 Jul 2012 02:01:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.24.68 with SMTP id s4mr14652100vdf.3.1343638864075;
        Mon, 30 Jul 2012 02:01:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-f173.google.com (mail-vc0-f173.google.com [209.85.220.173])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m9si1301374vdg.3.2012.07.30.02.01.04
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Mon, 30 Jul 2012 02:01:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of paskios@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.173 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.220.173;
Received: by vcbfl15 with SMTP id fl15so4193039vcb.4
        for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 02:01:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.214.8 with SMTP id gy8mr10295442vcb.45.1343638863965; Mon,
 30 Jul 2012 02:01:03 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.58.75.202 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 02:01:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAGO2uOOsQ7xTOWR7rxL=h1WG8P-=1_SxadJu7m+Eb0VZk8S=9w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <f9e54e8e-3a28-4c2c-8d82-aa8dd744565b@googlegroups.com>
	<CAGO2uOPKfwCs=H+yJDz0nBfQnkpnojwEnq8NZN_DwjG8NMjWeA@mail.gmail.com>
	<50156C53.802@gmx.de>
	<CAGO2uOOsQ7xTOWR7rxL=h1WG8P-=1_SxadJu7m+Eb0VZk8S=9w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 10:01:03 +0100
Message-ID: <CAPAJj9+UswqZ7DM-KWSey3ZH0tv07UrD_-Z6YN0j7vG1zqZTDg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] again about "out of"
From: tijlan <jbotijlan@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: paskios@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of paskios@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.173 as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=paskios@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

On 30 July 2012 09:37, Escape Landsome <escaaape@gmail.com> wrote:
> Now, either there is some cultural background common to everybody in
> Lojbanistan (and the notions of lojban grammar are a part of such a
> cultural background, so this background IS NON-EMPTY)...
>
> or that is not the case.
>
> In the former case, some metaphors should be possible to carry out.
>
> In the latter, no metaphor can be produced, but at least some new
> construction whose goal would be "to introduce instant and temporary
> metaphors that have meaning during the interaction", should be
> feasible.
>
> I would say ( // and * would be two new lojban words ) :
>
> "You really let the cat//info out-of the bag//concealment !"
>
> And you would reply
>
> "But the *cat was nearly dead..."

You don't have to mark "cat" and "bag" separately as a metaphor. You
can mark your whole sentence as a metaphor: add {pe'a} at the
beginning.


mu'o

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.