Received: from mail-lb0-f189.google.com ([209.85.217.189]:38459) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Sw63V-0003CL-2r; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 23:35:53 -0700 Received: by lbol5 with SMTP id l5sf3129885lbo.16 for ; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 23:35:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=jdnEaufw2hx9zhE5bSCqS0A5bEHkzAsK2zPOjvZXVWc=; b=Hlpcu1UbaXVAf41qOk88z86UQbGoyG/VrAHWEBAFxU9XVJcLwLvoJTb100lafDfskO SRlR0f2ufZDQOzKQB8We8tYKkwzUN4qtb+QuW9Hja5kcw9ROD75sCJMBtV8eT+wmXY33 5l9bevVVjKFFOlFPUDcUFawYtUMyY+7z0hbK8= Received: by 10.204.156.78 with SMTP id v14mr484931bkw.22.1343716536729; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 23:35:36 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.13.17 with SMTP id z17ls5465480bkz.5.gmail; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 23:35:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.205.126.4 with SMTP id gu4mr2615827bkc.8.1343716534918; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 23:35:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.205.126.4 with SMTP id gu4mr2615826bkc.8.1343716534892; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 23:35:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f49.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f49.google.com [209.85.215.49]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q3si3553490bkv.1.2012.07.30.23.35.34 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 30 Jul 2012 23:35:34 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.49 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.215.49; Received: by mail-lpp01m010-f49.google.com with SMTP id p9so4635519laa.8 for ; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 23:35:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.127.98 with SMTP id nf2mr14089035lab.4.1343716534636; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 23:35:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.136.73 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 23:35:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <6340de5d-35d5-4872-a2ee-dd2b0d577f52@googlegroups.com> References: <501660C8.3030908@gmx.de> <6340de5d-35d5-4872-a2ee-dd2b0d577f52@googlegroups.com> Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 00:35:34 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: again about "out of" From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.49 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d042d05aab9cf2104c61a623e X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --f46d042d05aab9cf2104c61a623e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Why to'e nenri and not se nenri, just out of curiosity? On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:08 AM, Gleki Arxokuna wrote: > > > On Monday, July 30, 2012 2:24:08 PM UTC+4, selpa'i wrote: >> >> Am 30.07.2012 12:15, schrieb Jacob Errington: >> >> On 29 July 2012 23:13, la .lindar. wrote: >> >>> I'm sure selpa'i and tsani and all of that lot are going to tease me >>> endlessly for this, but I came up with an experimental cmavo a while back >>> when I did the BPFK work that addressed this very problem. >>> >>> {te'i} from {to'e nenri} or {to'e + ne'i}. >>> >>> It marks of what something is outside. >>> >> >> {to'e ne'i} as one cmavo doesn't sound like a bad idea at all, and is >> likely to be added to the language, officially, I'd say. In fact, I've used >> {to'e ne'i} before, on more than one occasion. >> >> >> Yes, it's useful. However, it doesn't help for "walk out of the forest". >> The thing tagged by {te'i} or {to'e ne'i} doesn't talk about where you are >> coming from. I've used {to'o ne'i} "away from inside": mi cadzu to'o ne'i >> lo ricfoi. >> > +1 for {to'o ne'i}. > Still it's not neutral for a semantically neutral language to have a word > for "inside" but not have the word for "outside". > Of course, this leads to another, more global question: for how long shall > lojbanists invent new cmavo for the sake of symmetry making the learning of > the language harder and harder due to to a huge list of words? > We should really search for better algorithms (like reusing gismu, > rephrasing jufra instead of imitating European languages). > > >> mu'o mi'e la selpa'i >> >> -- >> pilno zo le xu .i lo dei bangu cu se cmene zo lojbo .e nai zo lejbo >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/Dc_Z0jdYTGgJ. > > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > -- mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --f46d042d05aab9cf2104c61a623e Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Why to'e nenri and not se nenri, just out of curiosity?

On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:08 AM, Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:


On Monday, July 30= , 2012 2:24:08 PM UTC+4, selpa'i wrote:
=20 =20 =20
Am 30.07.2012 12:15, schrieb Jacob Errington:
On 29 July 2012 23:13, la .lindar. <lindarthebard@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm sure selpa'i and tsani and all of that lot are goin= g to tease me endlessly for this, but I came up with an experimental cmavo a while back when I did the BPFK work that addressed this very problem.

{te'i} from {to'e nenri} or {to'e + ne'i= }.

It marks of what something is outside.

{to'e ne'i} as one cmavo doesn't sound like a = bad idea at all, and is likely to be added to the language, officially, I'd say. In fact, I've used {to'e ne= 9;i} before, on more than one occasion.

Yes, it's useful. However, it doesn't help for "walk out= of the forest". The thing tagged by {te'i} or {to'e ne'i} d= oesn't talk about where you are coming from. I've used {to'o ne'i} &q= uot;away from inside": mi cadzu to'o ne'i lo ricfoi.
+1 for {to'o ne'i}.
Still it's n= ot neutral for a semantically neutral language to have a word for "ins= ide" but not have the word for "outside".
Of course, this leads to another, more global question: for how long s= hall lojbanists invent new cmavo for the sake of symmetry making the learni= ng of the language harder and harder due to to a huge list of words?
We should really search for better algorithms (like reusing gismu, rep= hrasing jufra instead of imitating European languages).


mu'o mi'e la selpa'i

--=20
pilno zo le xu .i lo dei bangu cu se cmene zo lojbo .e nai zo lejbo
  

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com= /d/msg/lojban/-/Dc_Z0jdYTGgJ.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.



--
mu'o mi= 'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.l= uk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. = :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--f46d042d05aab9cf2104c61a623e--