Received: from mail-gh0-f189.google.com ([209.85.160.189]:51163) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SwjcM-0006dC-TC; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 17:50:36 -0700 Received: by ghbf16 with SMTP id f16sf9713712ghb.16 for ; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 17:50:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=zs0vQH3Zx2+BmzhqhQR3B1WoLYbLqtSg2HK+ZMGzj0I=; b=FOpl7ItIgqHbfqbYKtzxyRxRGQWBjPuDhEPfC7jl/WRoHBXhVnXwlpkgFnXWCVcynW 2R3r4hSIU6XSCMb+6XK1TsC8UQRm2YdXRG/3BgcZrRzvGLRi5m20oeee5OVfzGGAaUyJ 8EF0qslC6bXlmIVuipd9nCUWSpLudi5e2zRkI= Received: by 10.50.237.10 with SMTP id uy10mr15340igc.3.1343868616025; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 17:50:16 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.155.201 with SMTP id vy9ls2306568igb.4.gmail; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 17:50:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.250.75 with SMTP id mn11mr368979icb.12.1343868611249; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 17:50:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.250.75 with SMTP id mn11mr368978icb.12.1343868611232; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 17:50:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ob0-f171.google.com (mail-ob0-f171.google.com [209.85.214.171]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id en7si1377429igc.0.2012.08.01.17.50.11 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 01 Aug 2012 17:50:11 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of blindbravado@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.171 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.171; Received: by obqv19 with SMTP id v19so31300464obq.16 for ; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 17:50:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.24.35 with SMTP id r3mr32611829oef.67.1343868610858; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 17:50:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.85.68 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 17:50:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 20:50:10 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] racli/ralci From: Ian Johnson To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: blindbravado@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of blindbravado@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.171 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=blindbravado@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8fb2067e2ccf7304c63dcb45 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --e89a8fb2067e2ccf7304c63dcb45 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 This is basically not fixable without moving the problem somewhere else. It's messy because there are so many distinct collision rules, but try going through and computing how many gismu can technically exist at the same time. It's not as big a number as you'd think. Without getting into the various rules introduced later in the CLL (which were meant to reduce problems like these), the number is still only around 22,000. Here's a way to get started: 5 vowels 17 consonants 48 initial clusters {11 unvoiced consonants, 10 voiced consonants, (m, l, n, and r get double counted) 9 "special exceptions": cs sc jz zj cx kx xc xk mz are all forbidden, and no double consonants}->191 internal clusters gives exactly 20315 gimtai. This avoids only collisions of final vowels, and permits every other apparent "collision", including all those listed in the CLL. These restrictions, to within a very crude approximation, probably divide the number given above by something between 2 and 3, giving a number between 6700 and 10000, probably closer to the former given that most of the collisions involve two letters. This is honestly pretty tight, to fit in ~1300 words. I agree with you, though, that some fiddling with the gimste, doing things like changing final vowels to move further away from the source languages to avoid *some* collisions would probably have been for the best. Too late now, of course. An interesting computation: assuming every *combination* of 2 vowels and 3 consonants can serve as exactly one gismu (which lets words differ only in their final vowel; not doing so makes the current number of gismu just * barely* fit), you get 6800 possible words. Almost all such combinations work, too: ignoring the 9 special exceptions, any 2 vowels obviously work, and any group of 3 consonants will have at least 2 with have the same voicing. It might be interesting to make up a hypothetical gimste subject to this restriction and none of the restrictions I linked (but still the voicing rules and the special exceptions). mu'o mi'e la latro'a no'u la latros On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 9:56 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: > I do not like these two words. They are both two (defined) place gismu, > they have very different meanings, and they differ ONLY in the order of c > and l, which is problematic for people with dyslexia. I feel they should at > least end with a different vowel. I would be very annoyed if I was to > accidentally say for example that because glass breaks when hit with a > hammer, it is mentally sound. > > Just felt like sharing. > > -- > mu'o mi'e .aionys. > > .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o > (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --e89a8fb2067e2ccf7304c63dcb45 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This is basically not fixable without moving the problem somewhere else. It= 's messy because there are so many distinct collision rules, but try go= ing through and computing how many gismu can technically exist at the same = time. It's not as big a number as you'd think. Without getting into= the various rules introduced later in the CLL (which were meant to reduce = problems like these), the number is still only around 22,000. Here's a = way to get started:
5 vowels
17 consonants
48 initial clusters
{11 unvoiced consonants= , 10 voiced consonants, (m, l, n, and r get double counted) 9 "special= exceptions": cs sc jz zj cx kx xc xk mz are all forbidden, and no dou= ble consonants}->191 internal clusters
gives exactly 20315 gimtai. This avoids only collisions of final vowels, an= d permits every other apparent "collision", including all those l= isted in the CLL. These res= trictions, to within a very crude approximation, probably divide the number= given above by something between 2 and 3, giving a number between 6700 and= 10000, probably closer to the former given that most of the collisions inv= olve two letters. This is honestly pretty tight, to fit in ~1300 words.
I agree with you, though, that some fiddling with the gimste, doing thi= ngs like changing final vowels to move further away from the source languag= es to avoid some collisions would probably have been for the best. T= oo late now, of course.

An interesting computation: assuming every combination of 2 vowe= ls and 3 consonants can serve as exactly one gismu (which lets words differ= only in their final vowel; not doing so makes the current number of gismu = just barely fit), you get 6800 possible words. Almost all such combi= nations work, too: ignoring the 9 special exceptions, any 2 vowels obviousl= y work, and any group of 3 consonants will have at least 2 with have the sa= me voicing. It might be interesting to make up a hypothetical gimste subjec= t to this restriction and none of the restrictions I linked (but still the = voicing rules and the special exceptions).

mu'o mi'e la latro'a no'u la latros


On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 9:56 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonu= s@gmail.com> wrote:
I do not like these two words. They are both= two (defined) place gismu, they have very different meanings, and they dif= fer ONLY in the order of c and l, which is problematic for people with dysl= exia. I feel they should at least end with a different vowel. I would be ve= ry annoyed if I was to accidentally say for example that because glass brea= ks when hit with a hammer, it is mentally sound.

Just felt like sharing.<= br clear=3D"all">
--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai= ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to= the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--e89a8fb2067e2ccf7304c63dcb45--