Received: from mail-yw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.213.61]:40867) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SxC5w-00044V-Bj; Fri, 03 Aug 2012 00:15:00 -0700 Received: by yhoo21 with SMTP id o21sf427338yho.16 for ; Fri, 03 Aug 2012 00:14:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=C99eSe74nZEKwKHSvjlpw8mykIF0AkrmTEjUdxvwDp8=; b=NFRgHkAu+XEN/nQGggbIGWmVQrF5wWyHghwutALJuxAjPNPOzAdvDMFDwN96ISFU7S 6VDgYPxI9Y0Kvh13CuqdzibD+oHWM5P2BBRptUjb+mUGZzq2vWNNHeEMVvD2XTU986bP 5wLl128HSfQnOeqNxsTJnBu6sp0zCmTsGmHWI= Received: by 10.52.66.44 with SMTP id c12mr40132vdt.19.1343978081527; Fri, 03 Aug 2012 00:14:41 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.52.36.147 with SMTP id q19ls1020320vdj.4.gmail; Fri, 03 Aug 2012 00:14:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.37.8 with SMTP id u8mr36888vdj.18.1343978080827; Fri, 03 Aug 2012 00:14:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2012 00:14:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Gleki Arxokuna To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: <8e34b84d-5e34-4e3e-b41f-30e7a5d4a71d@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: <90a7e54c-42fe-4ee0-9693-8155db9a7646@googlegroups.com> References: <90a7e54c-42fe-4ee0-9693-8155db9a7646@googlegroups.com> Subject: [lojban] Re: Is there any demand for LoCCan3? MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates internal as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_472_18193469.1343978080348" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_472_18193469.1343978080348 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 For those who think that lojban isn't enough. http://loccan3.wikinet.org/wiki/Main_Page http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/jboske/ might be a good discussion platform as And suggested. On Monday, July 2, 2012 10:17:57 AM UTC+4, Gleki Arxokuna wrote: > > Several recent messages mentioned the need for LoCCan3. > I wonder is there really any demand for it? > lojban.org wiki mentions nothing > special. > > 1. Fewer cmavo (but you are free to use fewer cmavo in current lojban) > 2. There should be new cmavo for individuals, sets and masses > 3. connectives > 4. anaphoric pronouns > (sorry, I didn't understand a word in #2,3,4, can you explain it to me in > plain language?). > 5. gismu with another number of sumti (but you are free not to use some > sumti, to use sumtcita etc.) > > Anyway, even if so is there any need to break existing language? > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/FO-w4rCGEnIJ. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. ------=_Part_472_18193469.1343978080348 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable For those who think that lojban isn't enough.

http://loccan3.wikine= t.org/wiki/Main_Page

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/jboske/ migh= t be a good discussion platform as And suggested.

On Monday, = July 2, 2012 10:17:57 AM UTC+4, Gleki Arxokuna wrote:
Several recent messages mentioned the need for LoCCa= n3.
I wonder is there really any demand for it?
lojban.org wiki mentions nothing specia= l.

1. Fewer cmavo (but you are free to use fewer c= mavo in current lojban)
2. There should be new cmavo for individu= als, sets and masses
3. connectives
4. anaphoric pronou= ns
(sorry, I didn't understand a word in #2,3,4, can you explain = it to me in plain language?).
5. gismu with another number of= sumti (but you are free not to use some sumti, to use sumtcita etc.)
=

Anyway, even if so is there any need to break existing = language?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/FO= -w4rCGEnIJ.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
------=_Part_472_18193469.1343978080348--