Received: from mail-yw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.213.61]:45994)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCOO27LuODBDRkfSABRoE40SP8Q@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1Sxcd6-0008Da-Ga; Sat, 04 Aug 2012 04:34:56 -0700
Received: by yhoo21 with SMTP id o21sf1927181yho.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 04 Aug 2012 04:34:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject
         :mime-version:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results
         :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id
         :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe
         :list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=NAfdaZzCVaqXGMNL02OeH1ulOGo1tsfd+rj9VRUtTc4=;
        b=sImeRMArninXEohz+lzTDoRVZGkB5IfjTW8tFC+498x6zzwuOFMtmL8+QoTVmeXPiM
         skwsXvEOjzTzYilAXqDcy4bvvTT/V39VuKqFpqNXSUccgpI5C1cjfQuBVa9jb/lJfLvf
         Ut+FVze8+0tSewaPk4kVlubZUtMlzrWISLJrY=
Received: by 10.52.21.235 with SMTP id y11mr582540vde.4.1344080081813;
        Sat, 04 Aug 2012 04:34:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.220.119.137 with SMTP id z9ls3832204vcq.2.gmail; Sat, 04 Aug
 2012 04:34:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.95.238 with SMTP id dn14mr592457vdb.1.1344080081105;
        Sat, 04 Aug 2012 04:34:41 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2012 04:34:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: iesk <pa.fae@gmx.de>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Message-Id: <d180cfff-337e-4279-b86a-bc35185aec10@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMKwHj1g3c-DhdEcPR9FkgA--LATXqOtON3a1BPp6Syj6=Qb9Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <58935d67-62c7-4949-b2ac-5c20da578d4e@googlegroups.com>
 <CAMKwHj08=SaFG3+OjrrfVmQ7K+UrFMSz+AAF5q2MOpwhf9mhhg@mail.gmail.com>
 <7b5f831b-fd0b-499e-899d-80cd1b12dd44@googlegroups.com>
 <CAMKwHj1g3c-DhdEcPR9FkgA--LATXqOtON3a1BPp6Syj6=Qb9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Suggestion for a new animacy marker in Lojban.
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Original-Sender: pa.fae@gmx.de
X-Original-Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of
 pa.fae@gmx.de designates internal as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=pa.fae@gmx.de; dkim=pass
 header.i=@gmx.de
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_1102_9282496.1344080080419"
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

------=_Part_1102_9282496.1344080080419
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Le samedi 4 ao=FBt 2012 10:01:16 UTC+2, aionys a =E9crit :
The less arbitrary distinctions there are, the better. And merely by the=20
simple fact that every language splits things differently, (although I'll=
=20
grant that language families tend to be tcesimsa if not mintu,) is enough=
=20
evidence for me at least that it is arbitrary.

I know that is human nature to classify things. We do it all the time. But=
=20
not all classifications are useful or necessary.


ni'o ti'e lo pe'a catni trusi'o befi la lobgu'e ku lei clira kakpa zo'u bau=
=20
la lojban. cusku be ji'i ro da zifre gi'e cusku be ji'i no da bilga .i=20
sidbo lo du'u ta'u nai kulnu nutli=B9 .i go'i lo du'u ta'u nai terzasti=20
naldukse=B2

ni'o ja'o ru'e bilga lo du'u tu'a lo si'o zo'e zukte ja nalzukte kei ka'e=
=20
frili se cusku bau ly. kei le bi'u nai trusi'o pe'a (to .i zu'u nai na'e=20
mukti lonu ba'e mi cusku toi)

__
=B9 cultural neutrality?
=B2 metaphysical parsimony?

What I am trying to say is that I think that, according to what I perceive=
=20
to be Lojban's ideology, there should be a relatively easy way to make the=
=20
animacy/inanimacy distinction (which I, by the way, feel no inclination of=
=20
making).

mu'o mi'e .iesk.

--=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lo=
jban/-/eQtxy3XSxxIJ.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou=
ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban=
?hl=3Den.


------=_Part_1102_9282496.1344080080419
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Le samedi 4 ao=FBt 2012 10:01:16 UTC+2, aionys a =E9crit :<br>The less arbi=
trary distinctions there are, the better. And merely by the simple fact tha=
t every language splits things differently, (although I'll grant that langu=
age families tend to be tcesimsa if not mintu,) is enough evidence for me a=
t least that it is arbitrary.<br> <br>I know that is human nature to classi=
fy things. We do it all the time. But not all classifications are useful or=
 necessary.<br><br><br>ni'o ti'e lo pe'a catni trusi'o befi la lobgu'e ku l=
ei clira kakpa zo'u bau la lojban. cusku be ji'i ro da zifre gi'e cusku be =
ji'i no da bilga .i sidbo lo du'u ta'u nai kulnu nutli=B9 .i go'i lo du'u t=
a'u nai terzasti naldukse=B2<br><br>ni'o ja'o ru'e bilga lo du'u tu'a lo si=
'o zo'e zukte ja nalzukte kei ka'e frili se cusku bau ly. kei le bi'u nai t=
rusi'o pe'a (to .i zu'u nai na'e mukti lonu ba'e mi cusku toi)<br><br>__<br=
>=B9 cultural neutrality?<br>=B2 metaphysical parsimony?<br><br>What I am t=
rying to say is that I think that, according to what I perceive to be Lojba=
n's ideology, there should be a relatively easy way to make the animacy/ina=
nimacy distinction (which I, by the way, feel no inclination of making).<br=
><br>mu'o mi'e .iesk.<br>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
lojban" group.<br />
To view this discussion on the web visit <a href=3D"https://groups.google.c=
om/d/msg/lojban/-/eQtxy3XSxxIJ">https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/eQ=
txy3XSxxIJ</a>.<br />=20
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou=
ps.com.<br />

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban=
?hl=3Den.<br />



------=_Part_1102_9282496.1344080080419--