Received: from mail-wi0-f189.google.com ([209.85.212.189]:40102) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Sy1WV-0002rD-CA; Sun, 05 Aug 2012 07:09:53 -0700 Received: by wibhr14 with SMTP id hr14sf502443wib.16 for ; Sun, 05 Aug 2012 07:09:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-authenticated:x-provags-id:message-id :date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-y-gmx-trusted:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=GKuTvFIcX4aqtEFEXX2ldHtq/4wds9lrPO9nBX4VfYg=; b=QTp+9SGuAJ0v4MQhB/t+ZlsLSPTT/2NmxIgAhgQt4UuaNXi4Q6PVLVaSm/+aOeJauW R8ixguItBZvc5CGOrGhUAV5moODSHZT2U2OcntB9x1bEuSOUXVhlENKau51qQWgT13s2 7LTJ8gron/4/KZY4w40wXwoewgL1QCNyBuT10= Received: by 10.180.105.163 with SMTP id gn3mr254958wib.0.1344175771281; Sun, 05 Aug 2012 07:09:31 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.81.71 with SMTP id y7ls2236231wix.3.gmail; Sun, 05 Aug 2012 07:09:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.241.9 with SMTP id f9mr388485wer.5.1344175769527; Sun, 05 Aug 2012 07:09:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.241.9 with SMTP id f9mr388484wer.5.1344175769513; Sun, 05 Aug 2012 07:09:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net. [213.165.64.22]) by gmr-mx.google.com with SMTP id cd1si1119790wib.1.2012.08.05.07.09.29; Sun, 05 Aug 2012 07:09:29 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of seladwa@gmx.de designates 213.165.64.22 as permitted sender) client-ip=213.165.64.22; Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 05 Aug 2012 14:09:29 -0000 Received: from p57A08B55.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO [192.168.1.33]) [87.160.139.85] by mail.gmx.net (mp020) with SMTP; 05 Aug 2012 16:09:29 +0200 X-Authenticated: #54293076 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19BYk0uDAZBAgK1v8LVqy5UmWZ2al6EylurwPmEuP 0aDVe5YWx4si6q Message-ID: <501E7E98.5070208@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2012 16:09:28 +0200 From: selpa'i User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] gua\spi References: <58935d67-62c7-4949-b2ac-5c20da578d4e@googlegroups.com> <501D77E4.90004@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Original-Sender: seladwa@gmx.de X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of seladwa@gmx.de designates 213.165.64.22 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=seladwa@gmx.de Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / Am 05.08.2012 07:11, schrieb Jim Carter: > On Sat, 4 Aug 2012, selpa'i wrote: > >> I read that the inventor James Carter is not working on the language >> anymore, but maybe he'd be interested in getting back into it, if >> there was an audience of interested people. > > Unfortunately I've had to make some choices about what to commit time > to, and other issues pushed ahead of gua\spi. How complete is gua\spi? If it's as usable as Lojban currently is, I'd say it's very close to complete. So if you have some other texts about the language, more grammar explanations etc, it would be great to be able to read them. Also, you mention that you translated quite a bit of text into gua\spi. Could you upload that text somewhere? I would like to see some actual usage of the language. > * One of my major goals for gua\spi was to bring some sanity to > mathematical expressions (MEX) which were being designed at that time. > You might say that MEX grammar was tacked onto the core of Lojban, > whereas MEX *is* the core of gua\spi, I don't have a problem with that, being that I'm a big proponent of mekso in lojban. So bottom line, how realistic would you consider it to be that people could start learning gua\spi? Would you be able to support the learners if some bigger problems arose? Once more than one person (you) is at a good level in the language, the burden gets distributed and eventually, the language will get a life of its own. In hope, mu'o mi'e la selpa'i -- pilno zo le xu .i lo dei bangu cu se cmene zo lojbo .e nai zo lejbo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.