Received: from mail-yw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.213.61]:41248)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCJzE7b_XFxD9i_qABRoEpsBSnQ@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1Sy20y-0003Hn-AG; Sun, 05 Aug 2012 07:41:20 -0700
Received: by yhoo21 with SMTP id o21sf2922401yho.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Sun, 05 Aug 2012 07:41:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject
         :mime-version:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results
         :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id
         :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe
         :list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=ktql0aSNY96yBjKhMkKyU7Q8pyXmx2xByPyASSjVba0=;
        b=IFaMypU+zG4Qn39Qn91quzZTW9gydfLCheHhiR8Mfy/Zm3LTPR2H354RLdmSDy0kGT
         UsspljQXlMm06c/BIe792hRAxq/Qqn4DigQdG0BM5562TYP01DcLF0/GJbY3x49lhA9i
         rCKBYGs74/ENJhJVgLq0fjHSxOmos17NIZxeg=
Received: by 10.236.192.164 with SMTP id i24mr1270378yhn.14.1344177661431;
        Sun, 05 Aug 2012 07:41:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.236.126.33 with SMTP id a21ls10655555yhi.3.gmail; Sun, 05 Aug
 2012 07:41:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.236.109.233 with SMTP id s69mr1289190yhg.11.1344177660798;
        Sun, 05 Aug 2012 07:41:00 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 07:40:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: djandus <jandew@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Message-Id: <b009781f-3cae-4773-85cf-8730270d335e@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <8a72d9e6-4047-40ad-a1c2-ca19e97db2ed@googlegroups.com>
References: <d31f9fdd-bfa0-4f98-ba41-77ed87af37a6@googlegroups.com> <501CCD85.9090902@gmail.com> <CAEimHHArGqziabsHa-vi_dGeFhtnStyQf6GovS6Frk=xWr1Vdg@mail.gmail.com>
 <201208041530.45361.phma@phma.optus.nu>
 <8a72d9e6-4047-40ad-a1c2-ca19e97db2ed@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Ancient Greek, free word order and the same FA two times
  in a bridi
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Original-Sender: jandew@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of
 jandew@gmail.com designates internal as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=jandew@gmail.com; dkim=pass
 header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_1752_2353942.1344177659788"
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

------=_Part_1752_2353942.1344177659788
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Sunday, August 5, 2012 4:38:29 AM UTC-5, iesk wrote:
>
> I tend to think that {broda fa ko'a fa ko'e} means more or less the same 
> thing as {ko'a broda .i ko'e broda}, 

This is also what I was imagining at first, but I didn't realize it until 
you said it. It occurs to me that this would probably be the most easily 
acceptable interpretation for dealing with the problems I brought up (i.e. 
how it interrelates with {be} and GOhA usage) as it leaves it up to context 
what relationship there is between the two statements, if any. In the case 
of GOhA, it would generally be an overwrite of the previous, implying some 
form of correction. In the case of {be} and double-FA, I think it's a 
somewhat silly usage, but it could make sense. 

Personally, I find the pure "erasure" sort of usage to be very useful, and 
any other kind of... weak. I also think logical connective implications 
would be explicitly wrong, as those feel completely against the GOhA 
overwrite usage, and it would only be a very small shortcut to far more 
confusing statements that are already expressible.

mu'o mi'e djos

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/_o4N0gR78SIJ.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.


------=_Part_1752_2353942.1344177659788
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sunday, August 5, 2012 4:38:29 AM UTC-5, iesk wrote:<blockquote class=3D=
"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin: 0;margin-left: 0.8ex;border-left: 1px #ccc s=
olid;padding-left: 1ex;"><ponifytext>I tend to think that {broda fa ko'a fa=
 ko'e} means more or less the same thing as {ko'a broda .i ko'e broda},&nbs=
p;</ponifytext></blockquote><div>This is also what I was imagining at first=
, but I didn't realize it until you said it. It occurs to me that this woul=
d probably be the most easily acceptable interpretation for dealing with th=
e problems I brought up (i.e. how it interrelates with {be} and GOhA usage)=
 as it leaves it up to context what relationship there is between the two s=
tatements, if any. In the case of GOhA, it would generally be an overwrite =
of the previous, implying some form of correction. In the case of {be} and =
double-FA, I think it's a somewhat silly usage, but it could make sense.&nb=
sp;</div><div><br></div><div>Personally, I find the pure "erasure" sort of =
usage to be very useful, and any other kind of... weak. I also think logica=
l connective implications would be explicitly wrong, as those feel complete=
ly against the GOhA overwrite usage, and it would only be a very small shor=
tcut to far more confusing statements that are already expressible.</div><d=
iv><br></div><div>mu'o mi'e djos</div>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
lojban" group.<br />
To view this discussion on the web visit <a href=3D"https://groups.google.c=
om/d/msg/lojban/-/_o4N0gR78SIJ">https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/_o=
4N0gR78SIJ</a>.<br />=20
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou=
ps.com.<br />

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban=
?hl=3Den.<br />



------=_Part_1752_2353942.1344177659788--