Received: from mail-pb0-f61.google.com ([209.85.160.61]:33094)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCNTPpI2KGxDgzPqABRoEGN1RCA@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1Sy4Ah-0004dQ-At; Sun, 05 Aug 2012 09:59:32 -0700
Received: by pbbro2 with SMTP id ro2sf3122423pbb.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Sun, 05 Aug 2012 09:59:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references
         :in-reply-to:mime-version:message-id:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-disposition;
        bh=Au3xhLPDiZvdUFEo26M75FNCI7R/bN/dDFX/GJ877uw=;
        b=j706FU8EzNB2QM3WpUyQyVWmWfcPO1ftDSPAPiPCDjFaCFHCKMx5/E5RIdQKoQk89p
         oWG50qR2F5i/iZ5rMkP83UYv1SPaN3He8DmEU9Qn92QQ9AHYWUnuEgRz3S8rJj5p70pQ
         GSnWOCLk/mw6gKKDZSbThd23DE72Ra2kKqZ8A=
Received: by 10.236.170.7 with SMTP id o7mr1277077yhl.3.1344185952753;
        Sun, 05 Aug 2012 09:59:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.236.78.164 with SMTP id g24ls10652089yhe.6.gmail; Sun, 05 Aug
 2012 09:59:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.236.200.194 with SMTP id z42mr4556315yhn.13.1344185951872;
        Sun, 05 Aug 2012 09:59:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.236.200.194 with SMTP id z42mr4556314yhn.13.1344185951860;
        Sun, 05 Aug 2012 09:59:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from chausie (cpe-069-132-101-103.carolina.res.rr.com. [69.132.101.103])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id j22si1353293ano.0.2012.08.05.09.59.11;
        Sun, 05 Aug 2012 09:59:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 69.132.101.103 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@phma.optus.nu) client-ip=69.132.101.103;
Received: from ip6-localhost (ip6-localhost [IPv6:::1])
	by chausie (Postfix) with ESMTP id B70202AD3B
	for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Sun,  5 Aug 2012 12:59:10 -0400 (EDT)
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] A Word for "abstractor" and for "abstraction"
Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 12:59:06 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405)
References: <CAOQ8VDX2hwRdvec3TjUfCz6E-FKV++06+4XRziYFzVkZ6rRjvw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOQ8VDX2hwRdvec3TjUfCz6E-FKV++06+4XRziYFzVkZ6rRjvw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <201208051259.08774.phma@phma.optus.nu>
X-Original-Sender: phma@phma.optus.nu
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com:
 69.132.101.103 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for
 domain of phma@phma.optus.nu) smtp.mail=phma@phma.optus.nu
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

On Sunday 05 August 2012 11:54:29 Jacob Errington wrote:
> coi
>
> Of course, this topic has come up before, I'm sure, but I have two
> suggestions and I'd like to get a feel for what the mailing list community
> thinks.
>
> sucma'o = x1=cm1 is a structure/grammar word/[abstractor] governing
> abstractions of type x2=cm2 in language x3=cm3.
> sucybri = x1=b1 is an abstracted predication/[abstraction] of type x2=b2
> with arguments x3=b3.
>
> cimjvo, I'm afraid, but I can't see how else to do this, unless we make
> zi'evla for gismu for the occasion.

Sounds good to me, though some languages use other than words for this, so I 
suggest also:

sucrafsi: r1 is an affix corresponding to word r2 (which may be zi'o) 
governing abstractions of type s3=r3 in language r4.

"-tion" and "-ing" (gerund), for example, cu sucrafsi zi'o.

Pierre
-- 
loi mintu se ckaji danlu cu jmaji

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.