Received: from mail-ob0-f189.google.com ([209.85.214.189]:55100) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SyRg2-0002xN-Ow; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 11:05:19 -0700 Received: by obbun3 with SMTP id un3sf4091838obb.16 for ; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 11:05:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=rlFt8oxF9m9DQxmMuel0XB0BfED0uxpOfbbyeu3m0+k=; b=J3y+ptoSpPs/AO5Q0toCD70qxUqQ+BDBHKq6u2CCeo4EYf5d1n9Mwrqb+I17hdDNly 6KMtP5FyjC1gMQZvNA3He8NOwhQuqVsDcXnI8Gsbw7/c1JkOWdN8Y8oO+iygPj5rD9H+ s0O+ooDfLPZO849gELbAA/lJRinDMI6b+sv8Y= Received: by 10.182.13.35 with SMTP id e3mr120278obc.12.1344266443690; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 08:20:43 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.182.47.99 with SMTP id c3ls4167988obn.0.gmail; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 08:20:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.112.7 with SMTP id im7mr123926obb.6.1344266442861; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 08:20:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 08:20:41 -0700 (PDT) From: Gleki Arxokuna To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: <9fa1f123-4892-4da4-8f17-4c856a56f1ab@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20000625000846.27040.qmail@hotmail.com> <1344098888.48487.YahooMailNeo@web184404.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Subject: Re: [lojban] RE:Trivalent Logics MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates internal as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_77_30734170.1344266442027" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_77_30734170.1344266442027 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sunday, August 5, 2012 5:49:49 PM UTC+4, clifford wrote: > > I'm not sure what the Aymara population is, but linguists -- including a= =20 > number of native speakers of Aymara who have gone on to graduate degrees = in=20 > linguistics -- agree that Guzman's interpretation of the data (much of=20 > which they say he also has wrong) is incorrect. In short, Aymara does no= t=20 > use trivalent logic, though it does have a number of --to us -- unfamilia= r=20 > epistemic modalities.=20 > If so the task to implement trivalent logic is no longer of utter=20 importance for me. I thought that the inventors of Aymara were much wiser. uinai they were not.=20 ta'o Why implementing this logic won't solve any problems? What can solve= =20 them? Quaternary logic? Do you have any thoughts of how to implement it? > > Sent from my iPad > > On Aug 5, 2012, at 3:20 AM, Gleki Arxokuna = =20 > wrote: > > > > On Saturday, August 4, 2012 8:48:08 PM UTC+4, clifford wrote: >> >> Yeah, with the unlikely exception of Aymara, it is hard to imagine what= =20 >> this would look like in practice. >> > Why not? Millions of people use it while speaking the language that is=20 > highly naturalistic. > Just relexing Aymara to Lojban should be quite easy. It's all the matter= =20 > of how to teach people to use new but better cmavo. > =20 > >> Juggling even the six basics xorxes offers (or the minimal three)=20 >> probably pushes one's understanding pretty far, unless you have a very= =20 >> concrete notion of what the third value is (and then you may be surprise= d=20 >> at what the system offers you in some cases). We seem to be better with= =20 >> fuzzy (but let's don't get started on that!) than clear-cut triads or mo= re=20 >> when it comes to dealing with the world. >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From:* Jorge Llamb=EDas < jjllambias@gmail.com> >> *To:* lojban@googlegroups.com=20 >> *Sent:* Saturday, August 4, 2012 11:26 AM >> *Subject:* Re: [lojban] RE:Trivalent Logics >> =20 >> On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Gleki Arxokuna >> < gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote: >> > doi xorxes xu do pu troci lo nu pilno lo cimei logji xusycmuma'o ca'o= =20 >> lo nu >> > tavla? >> >> .i no roi go'i >> >> mu'o mi'e xorxes >> >> --=20 >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group= s=20 >> "lojban" group. >> To post to this group, send email to >> lojban@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@ >> googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at=20 >> http://groups.google.com/ >> group/lojban?hl=3Den. >> >> >> >> --=20 > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups= =20 > "lojban" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit=20 > > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/BrVEgpdpPDEJ. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to=20 > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at=20 > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den. > > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lo= jban/-/kp2wqSHdxZsJ. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den. ------=_Part_77_30734170.1344266442027 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sunday, August 5, 2012 5:49:49 PM UTC+4, clifford wrote:
I'm not = sure what the Aymara population is, but linguists -- including a number of = native speakers of Aymara who have gone on to graduate degrees in linguisti= cs -- agree that Guzman's interpretation of the data (much of which they sa= y he also has wrong) is incorrect.  In short, Aymara does not use triv= alent logic, though it does have a number of --to us -- unfamiliar epistemi= c modalities. 
If so the tas= k to implement trivalent logic is no longer of utter importance for me. I t= hought that the inventors of Aymara were much wiser.
uinai they w= ere not. 
ta'o Why implementing this logic won't solve = any problems? What can solve them? Quaternary logic? Do you have any though= ts of how to implement it?

Sent from my iPad

On Aug = 5, 2012, at 3:20 AM, Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:
<= br>


On Saturday, Aug= ust 4, 2012 8:48:08 PM UTC+4, clifford wrote:
Yeah, with t= he unlikely exception of Aymara, it is hard to imagine what this would look= like in practice.
Why not? Milli= ons of people use it while speaking the language that is highly naturalisti= c.
Just relexing Aymara to Lojban should be quite easy. It's all = the matter of how to teach people to use new but better cmavo.
&n= bsp;
  Juggling even the six basics xorxes offe= rs (or the minimal three) probably pushes one's understanding pretty far, u= nless you have a very concrete notion of what the third value is (and then = you may be surprised at what the system offers you in some cases).  We= seem to be better with fuzzy (but let's don't get started on that!) than c= lear-cut triads or more when it comes to dealing with the world.
=


From:<= /b> Jorge Llamb=EDas <jjlla= mbias@gmail.com>
To:<= /b> lojban@googlegroups.= com
Sent: Saturday,= August 4, 2012 11:26 AM
Subject: Re: [lojban] RE:Trivalent Logics

On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Gleki Arxokuna
<gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wro= te:
> doi xorxes xu do pu troci lo nu pilno lo cimei logji xusycmuma'= o ca'o lo nu
> tavla?

.i no roi go'i

mu'o mi'e xorxes
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Go= ogle Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For m= ore options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.<= br>


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://grou= ps.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/BrVEgpdpPDEJ.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googleg= roups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/= lojban?hl=3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/kp= 2wqSHdxZsJ.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
------=_Part_77_30734170.1344266442027--