Received: from mail-yw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.213.61]:42911) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SyZP0-00076S-Dh; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 19:20:20 -0700 Received: by yhoo21 with SMTP id o21sf4630018yho.16 for ; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 19:20:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-yahoo-newman-property:x-yahoo-newman-id :x-ymail-osg:x-mailer:references:message-id:date:from:reply-to :subject:to:in-reply-to:mime-version:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=y6vi7TFgS4JXeEhE8yW6OtC8BlEFD/MNBo6Bb9MgejQ=; b=W6n4il4U4s8RXFS8bA8MeNW5+yv95tLhhLdE5w27somraSU5xi9h+al2F2+0erv9Vi 7iBLA85jd2he7LwWMiuopnrZLT0ql+xuAEpjwu2UGhRh6QZfNkMt/yy67Ic0VdwSsL03 PxvD4kcGOpAUJ98WltSnKdcsKa2tJbpE3o+VM= Received: by 10.68.202.36 with SMTP id kf4mr945226pbc.10.1344306003748; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 19:20:03 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.68.210.197 with SMTP id mw5ls804354pbc.7.gmail; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 19:20:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.84.41 with SMTP id v9mr1607623pay.43.1344306003078; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 19:20:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.84.41 with SMTP id v9mr1607622pay.43.1344306003062; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 19:20:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nm13.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com (nm13.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com. [98.139.52.210]) by gmr-mx.google.com with SMTP id vv9si1097758pbc.2.2012.08.06.19.20.02; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 19:20:03 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 98.139.52.210 as permitted sender) client-ip=98.139.52.210; Received: from [98.139.52.195] by nm13.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 07 Aug 2012 02:20:02 -0000 Received: from [68.142.194.243] by tm8.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 07 Aug 2012 02:20:02 -0000 Received: from [66.94.237.114] by t1.bullet.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 07 Aug 2012 02:20:02 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1019.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 07 Aug 2012 02:20:02 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 89243.34995.bm@omp1019.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 77844 invoked by uid 60001); 7 Aug 2012 02:20:01 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: vB72mxAVM1kYb3xNo2oToH0hg.ps33fhETGOsYOazWbtVgZ fs0l662q9qYDHLi2R7DOmK0EtYcMecPBiFTlWK1DG3Ll8VmQowGsvauadmAt CfV_ax32uaf4KjtmDeE.QO4jAV2xxEvNNPmkBDIoV2GeO9LitlbMaSYZrJt4 SKzOP8SO526lIo4JEvKUwrcFweVSYfZemrtUXOuE2necHS8tn3sfdfS8_A.D gbBRBU7tmuS8JVXBdzXGEe39QsfJQuELATLMYJUB0WY_.zgzF9KGzOv7bopy wQOIlK5sjs4ECNjm40vkNVFHnQWiq7n7acJ1KCtu5KHUV6X6X2fkh_TOx6VH JrmL_lJTJjgBgJuTx8LlreoKL6vK5jYH8_.Zd15rN2kkqHE_zibVr5pdl2Pr bY4AFFjEc.pIAmB_ICey0UGYz2UbD1qydrZf2ozimrcn95GlISr60uP97IOn fd2vZkGognzsN5DZfJwcwtEZFqlBgQYZCjxLeoYEESi62Zd1zEoMpPrnTCEf z4rr6KE5curvJGncQBOXGRknf5gBBHmwHNpZS0k0jaxZOfi6cuD_mGL5gJD4 nh6L2HR_B5da9uCIJSe1aW5M0QMmUkln0CZJ4x8IwtHZoNXGMME9LnG56AMq dy1uWGx9BbKAb.qvfk0hLJ3U- Received: from [99.92.108.194] by web184401.mail.bf1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 19:20:01 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.120.356233 References: <1a5f9ca9-75f1-409b-868c-5b7c3e6a9674@googlegroups.com> <1059afae-0f80-41eb-9a0f-e95bca0179ac@googlegroups.com> Message-ID: <1344306001.75305.YahooMailNeo@web184401.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 19:20:01 -0700 (PDT) From: John E Clifford Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Revising mu'ei and CAhA once again. Possible worlds. To: "lojban@googlegroups.com" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: kali9putra@yahoo.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 98.139.52.210 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kali9putra@yahoo.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@yahoo.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="1009959307-1448316179-1344306001=:75305" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --1009959307-1448316179-1344306001=:75305 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I've lost something here, I think.=A0 'mu'ei' doesn't say anything about an= y particular bag, only about the universe of bags (if I am right of thinkin= g of bags as worlds).=A0 So to say it is possible that a ball selected from= a selected sack in that universe is black doesn't get beyond saying that s= ome balls in some bags are black.=A0 If we get to a particular bag, saying = that a selected ball might be black merely means that some balls in that ba= g are black, but this is no longer a modal claim (as the other might well n= ot be, if the supply of bags is fixed.=A0 (If the bags are not the worlds, = then I don't follow what is going on, if itis meant to be about possible wo= rlds.) ________________________________ From: Jorge Llamb=EDas To: lojban@googlegroups.com=20 Sent: Monday, August 6, 2012 5:34 PM Subject: Re: [lojban] Revising mu'ei and CAhA once again. Possible worlds. =20 On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Gleki Arxokuna wrote: > > OK. If no other criticism I'll correct it and post it to lojban.org wiki. Strictly speaking, "ka'e" only says that the bag contains black balls. It doesn't say whether it also contains white balls or not, although pragmatically one expects that it will, just as when someone says "some" one pragmatically expects "but not all" to be true as well. Similarly "ka'e na" would say that the bag contains white ball, saying nothing about whether it contains black ones as well. In order to say that it contains both black and white balls you may need something like "su'opame'iro mu'ei", "in some but not all worlds". "May or may not", as opposed to just "may". I'd put "bi'ai" at the same level as "ka'e", it's not really about materialization. That the ball picked is black is just a consequence of all of them being black in that bag, so of course the one that materializes will be as well, but "bi'ai" has nothing to do with the materialization itself. Similarly it's not all that relevant to "na ka'e" that the ball picked is white, it's just a consequence of all of them being white in that bag. > Are there still other voices for mu'ei? "mu'ei" allows a more fine grained description of the contents of the bags, "so'u mu'ei", "so'o mu'ei", "so'i mu'ei", "so'e mu'ei", "so'a mu'ei", "du'e mu'ei", "rau mu'ei", "mo'a mu'ei". mu'o mi'e xorxes --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den. --1009959307-1448316179-1344306001=:75305 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I've lost = something here, I think.  'mu'ei' doesn't say anything about any parti= cular bag, only about the universe of bags (if I am right of thinking of ba= gs as worlds).  So to say it is possible that a ball sele= cted from a selected sack in that universe is black doesn't ge= t beyond saying that some balls in some bags are black.  If we get to = a particular bag, saying that a selected ball might be black merely means t= hat some balls in that bag are black, but this is no longer a modal claim (= as the other might well not be, if the supply of bags is fixed.  (If t= he bags are not the worlds, then I don't follow what is going on, if itis m= eant to be about possible worlds.)

From: Jorge L= lamb=EDas <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, August 6, 2012 5:34 PM
Subject: Re: [lojban] Revising mu'ei= and CAhA once again. Possible worlds.

On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Gleki Arxokuna
<glek= i.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> OK. If no other criti= cism I'll correct it and post it to lojban.org wiki.

Strictly speaking, "ka'e" only says t= hat the bag contains black balls.
It doesn't say whether it also contain= s white balls or not, although
pragmatically one expects that it will, j= ust as when someone says
"some" one pragmatically expects "but not all" = to be true as well.

Similarly "ka'e na" would say that the bag conta= ins white ball, saying
nothing about whether it contains black ones as w= ell.

In order to say that it contains both black and white balls you= may
need something like "su'opame'iro mu'ei", "in some but not all
w= orlds". "May or may not", as opposed to just "may".

I'd put "bi'ai" at the same level as "ka'e", it's not really about
materialization. Tha= t the ball picked is black is just a consequence
of all of them being bl= ack in that bag, so of course the one that
materializes will be as well,= but "bi'ai" has nothing to do with the
materialization itself. Similarl= y it's not all that relevant to "na
ka'e" that the ball picked is white,= it's just a consequence of all of
them being white in that bag.

= > Are there still other voices for mu'ei?

"mu'ei" allows a more f= ine grained description of the contents of the
bags, "so'u mu'ei", "so'o= mu'ei", "so'i mu'ei", "so'e mu'ei", "so'a
mu'ei", "du'e mu'ei", "rau mu= 'ei", "mo'a mu'ei".

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this= message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To= unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+uns= ubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at htt= p://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.



=

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--1009959307-1448316179-1344306001=:75305--