Received: from mail-gh0-f189.google.com ([209.85.160.189]:46578) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SzUT5-0004tp-It; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 08:16:27 -0700 Received: by ghbf16 with SMTP id f16sf620859ghb.16 for ; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 08:16:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-yahoo-newman-property:x-yahoo-newman-id :x-ymail-osg:x-mailer:references:message-id:date:from:reply-to :subject:to:in-reply-to:mime-version:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=vUH7Fn55IEMXVFLhVWAZV6kdF8fhImS+Q7awU6o1rtU=; b=V1rz+zYxBOZLiAU2Kakp5gJUDdCEcAovyxwXNraUvCpYdaCetAQnqbe46QYnrCx69A TtCwQ2JR3YGsmFvlDycW5xD9qW1cnHXobYi8HX/EeaJf1bqoLcFa1t7VY8mQIh+aZPLG JzEGgR3s5rjlcWUALAT1GdMf1+G0wjd9ZcgbU= Received: by 10.52.66.44 with SMTP id c12mr2699250vdt.19.1344525364862; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 08:16:04 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.220.149.129 with SMTP id t1ls2286998vcv.0.gmail; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 08:16:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.253.132 with SMTP id aa4mr6934329ved.12.1344525364236; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 08:16:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.253.132 with SMTP id aa4mr6934327ved.12.1344525364206; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 08:16:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nm24.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com (nm24.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com. [98.139.52.221]) by gmr-mx.google.com with SMTP id c10si282219vdu.1.2012.08.09.08.16.04; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 08:16:04 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 98.139.52.221 as permitted sender) client-ip=98.139.52.221; Received: from [98.139.52.195] by nm24.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Aug 2012 15:16:04 -0000 Received: from [68.142.200.225] by tm8.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Aug 2012 15:16:03 -0000 Received: from [66.94.237.105] by t6.bullet.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Aug 2012 15:16:03 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1010.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Aug 2012 15:16:03 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 737367.77913.bm@omp1010.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 53198 invoked by uid 60001); 9 Aug 2012 15:16:03 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: MpOKoPkVM1maMXnkR937dj.dl89mXeSPgVRodRyCCDuEMJc _j8.mxFeo0loWE..HN1KlpJx4G21NXQEeedsCNJKQ4_CzaCcil2KKT05zd14 xJ03FPOEf4Z118ZNX7gqU6ZNKu32IfF8cDgapLp45RD9Z.gD_38exi4Ji5bA P4xlGcHKaDZQuFqnGou7lJK8eu2DxZnMsDYZfZJPFHkl4To0z6._GhLUpJBb Jm4uYly8G8K.PED.ZjWMBLZCLcf98Hjmivc2LnmD5rzPYOnQYPtnxjpZFC5o E8gn7yBBfFgWEwZYY1.ZyFupp0coz0M1FWWNxpXj6OT2Tpsg5DVoXsFDkWtK Abs3vDiowjSSeslWpBGX1.bkiBYk.cW2KaCUFLm89HSTd.3vKWxDczznmyhe 4I_Kd5nQnx.2Q6DIHRmldZk_77d1YNmhmgKkPJ3q4fItRP5tkuj3FloN4YZH 8Jvlq9e3UE86ufU00IITQixur5tk8.T6pX4.dLGawdQZgRHwC5Jke_axh0II Ufn90nQxs4RWah8I68IS9qtxGSH7Ld1kZ2NOChE.wnSszMGbxmZ84gZbpFPN B0ejEOdJWarq2PKG30blQz5fyjLjQ4_HhwcwqtIS5FZ3z5HbQaEgiT8DSrOS CIC2gmr4OT896KUJZaGLiDZw- Received: from [99.92.108.194] by web184403.mail.bf1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 08:16:02 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.120.356233 References: <1a5f9ca9-75f1-409b-868c-5b7c3e6a9674@googlegroups.com> <1059afae-0f80-41eb-9a0f-e95bca0179ac@googlegroups.com> <1344353668.22980.YahooMailNeo@web184401.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <318ca405-4913-4081-9642-222bdfee3958@googlegroups.com> <1344375991.99278.YahooMailNeo@web184406.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1344525362.49578.YahooMailNeo@web184403.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 08:16:02 -0700 (PDT) From: John E Clifford Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Revising mu'ei and CAhA once again. Possible worlds. To: "lojban@googlegroups.com" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: kali9putra@yahoo.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 98.139.52.221 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kali9putra@yahoo.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@yahoo.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-6906265-1841544078-1344525362=:49578" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / ---6906265-1841544078-1344525362=:49578 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable {ni'i} and {va'o} are new to this discussion and seem to be foreign to it.= =A0 {ni'i} indicates that the marked statement follows logically (from the = preceding, usually) and can take the name of a logic to be more specific (d= efault among the all unnamed possibilities to standard bivalent logic).=A0 = Nothing overt to do with necessity or possibility here, though, if "follows= " means "by a valid inference", the marked sentence must be true if all the= premises are.=A0 This is thus not about the necessity of the marked senten= ce but only about the relation.=A0 This is peripherally related to the moda= ls, but obviously closer to various other=A0 "because"s. {va'o} is even more remote, forming part of a complex predicate, indicating= that the core predicate is active when the event {va'o} introduces occurs.= =A0 Nothing is said about whether the core event might occur otherwise or w= hether the core event always accompanies the condition.=A0 So, this relates= to even {ganai ... gi ...} in no particular way, all possibilities -- exce= pt that on an occasion the two coincided -- are possible. In short, this do= es not belong in the same semantic domain as the connective, and certainly = not of the modals. ________________________________ From: Gleki Arxokuna To: lojban@googlegroups.com=20 Sent: Thursday, August 9, 2012 12:08 AM Subject: Re: [lojban] Revising mu'ei and CAhA once again. Possible worlds. =20 On Thursday, August 9, 2012 2:54:00 AM UTC+4, xorxes wrote: On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Jorge Llamb=EDas wrote= :=20 >> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 1:35 AM, Gleki Arxokuna=20 >> wrote:=20 >>>=20 >>> anyway, what is in your opinion the difference between {pu'i} and {ca'a= }?=20 >[...]=20 >> That leaves two interesting meanings without a simple form, that we=20 >> can assign to "pu'i" and "nu'o":=20 >>=20 >> ka'e na je ca'a =3D pu'i=20 >> ka'e je na ca'a =3D nu'o=20 >>=20 >> pu'i: "actually, but not necessarily" or "actually, but possibly not"=20 >> nu'o: "actually not but possibly" or "actually not, but not necessarily = not"=20 > >I forgot to mention that this corresponds well with your diagrams:=20 >"pu'i" is a black ball that comes from a bag also containing white=20 >balls, and "nu'o is a white ball that comes from a bag also containing=20 >black balls, so they make reference both to the ball and the bag,=20 >while "ca'a" is just a black ball, and "ka'e" is just a bag containg=20 >black balls.=20 > Your scheme is excellent, doi xorxes. Yes, there is not much difference bet= ween your scheme and mine. Probably, because I based mine on your notes in lojban.org wiki pages on mu= 'ei, conditionals and CAhA :-) The wiki doesn't mention {pu'i}. That's why {ca'a} is http://www.lojban.org/tiki/''ca'ai'',+''ka'ei''+and+''nu'oi',+and+''nau'a''= =A0 not defined correctly (is it {ka'e je ca'a} or {ka'e na je ca'a}?). But your new scheme is pretty clear. I wish we could add {da'i} to this scheme. Anyway, I'm sure that redefining CAhA as xorxes just suggested is a must. I don't know how to explain my scheme better but the shortest version of it would be A-level. {ka'e} M-level. {nu'o,pu'i} F-level. {ca'a} Other topics relating to conditionals are: 1. Relation between {ni'i} and {ganai ... gi}. Needs to be clarified. What = are your thoughts, John? 2. {va'o} which as wiki mentions is more vague and therefore powerful than = {ganai ...gi}. >mu'o mi'e xorxes=20 > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lo= jban/-/4kwHtIuc8mUJ. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den. ---6906265-1841544078-1344525362=:49578 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
{ni'i} and= {va'o} are new to this discussion and seem to be foreign to it.  {ni'= i} indicates that the marked statement follows logically (from the precedin= g, usually) and can take the name of a logic to be more specific (default a= mong the all unnamed possibilities to standard bivalent logic).  Nothi= ng overt to do with necessity or possibility here, though, if "follows" mea= ns "by a valid inference", the marked sentence must be true if all the prem= ises are.  This is thus not about the necessity of the marked sentence= but only about the relation.  This is peripherally related to the mod= als, but obviously closer to various other  "because"s.
{va'o} is even more remote, forming part of a complex predicat= e, indicating that the core predicate is active when the event {va'o} introduces occurs.  Nothing is said about whether the core event migh= t occur otherwise or whether the core event always accompanies the conditio= n.  So, this relates to even {ganai ... gi ...} in no particular way, = all possibilities -- except that on an occasion the two coincided -- are po= ssible. In short, this does not belong in the same semantic domain as the c= onnective, and certainly not of the modals.

=

From: Gl= eki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, August 9, 2012 12:08 AM<= br> Subject: Re: [lojban] Revising mu'= ei and CAhA once again. Possible worlds.



On Thursday, August 9, 2012 2:54:00 AM UT= C+4, xorxes wrote:
On = Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Jorge Llamb=EDas <jjlla...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 1:35 AM, Gleki Arxokuna
> <gleki.is...@gmail.com> wr= ote:
>>
>> anyway, what is in your opinion the difference between {pu'i} = and {ca'a}?
[...]
> That leaves two interesting meanings without a simple form, that w= e
> can assign to "pu'i" and "nu'o":
>
> ka'e na je ca'a =3D pu'i
> ka'e je na ca'a =3D nu'o
>
> pu'i: "actually, but not necessarily" or "actually, but possibly n= ot"
> nu'o: "actually not but possibly" or "actually not, but not necess= arily not"

I forgot to mention that this corresponds well with your diagrams:
"pu'i" is a black ball that comes from a bag also containing white
balls, and "nu'o is a white ball that comes from a bag also containing
black balls, so they make reference both to the ball and the bag,
while "ca'a" is just a black ball, and "ka'e" is just a bag containg
black balls.
Your scheme is excellent, doi xorxes. Yes, there is n= ot much difference between your scheme and mine.
Probably, becaus= e I based mine on your notes in lojban.org wiki pages on mu'ei, conditionals and CAhA :-)
The wiki doesn't mention {pu'i}. That's why {ca'a} is
not defined correctly (is it {ka'e je ca'a} o= r {ka'e na je ca'a}?).
But your new scheme is pretty clear.
=
I wish we could add {da'i} to this scheme.
Anyway, I'm sure = that redefining CAhA as xorxes just suggested is a must.

I don't know how to explain my scheme better
but the short= est version of it would be
A-level. {ka'e}
M-level. {nu'o,= pu'i}
F-level. {ca'a}

Other topics relat= ing to conditionals are:
1. Relation between {ni'i} and {ganai ..= . gi}. Needs to be clarified. What are your thoughts, John?
2. {v= a'o} which as wiki mentions is more vague and therefore powerful than {gana= i ...gi}.

mu'o mi'e xorxes
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://= groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/4kwHtIuc8mUJ.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
---6906265-1841544078-1344525362=:49578--