Received: from mail-vb0-f61.google.com ([209.85.212.61]:34373) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SzjuV-0003RJ-Nl; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 00:45:45 -0700 Received: by vbzb23 with SMTP id b23sf1400740vbz.16 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 00:45:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=ocaCxo/3zMuu9nfwRtpNUilmPyrxJ6eT3pMBA0zAIrc=; b=zdUAlX00ntj7fVaotNkAwgm++YRcpxVTgWa7VY7UbLY3Es3aEHLOpJlwt895t+hvKL wXsatGJvRmcDyHz5JQKBluNoRxjaf3FJn+TokJKbhh+o795kezoJFmbmQsK1hM+SL62q fqyEy7n9anMxkmX20yWmwFAoTNpdEzxQ7Zfqw= Received: by 10.52.99.73 with SMTP id eo9mr230495vdb.10.1344584725054; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 00:45:25 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.220.148.143 with SMTP id p15ls2933375vcv.9.gmail; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 00:45:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.97.102 with SMTP id dz6mr243476vdb.2.1344584724554; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 00:45:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 00:45:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Gleki Arxokuna To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: <1009d698-c2d4-4dd5-b8b8-d37fb2f2860d@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: <4bdee803-3d24-474b-bf12-ced2d730960a@googlegroups.com> References: <201aced6-3e11-408d-b3ec-c31d042519c7@googlegroups.com> <50eeeab2-c661-4c30-8cda-2f9ddb8767de@googlegroups.com> <4bdee803-3d24-474b-bf12-ced2d730960a@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: [lojban] Direction of Rotation MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates internal as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_441_13109002.1344584724205" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_441_13109002.1344584724205 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Friday, August 10, 2012 11:40:37 AM UTC+4, la .lindar. wrote: > > I had an idea. Things can only move circularly in one of two directions. >>> Why not just use {carna fi li pa} and {carna fi li re}, or even {carna fi >>> lo pritu} and {carna fi lo zunle}? >> >> > From a completely unbiased standpoint, without any cultural knowledge, > does that unambiguously indicate direction of rotation? > Which way is "left"? Are we measuring from the bottom or the top? > Which way is the "first" rotation? Is that culturally neutral? > I'm pretty sure that it's not. doi lindar, your solution works, we only need to to replace "farlu" with something more generalised. But.... * * *Against lujvo.* Although we can fix any meaning in any lujvo I want something more fundamental. otherwise we can just replace half of gismu with lujvo. It doesnt make tha language more beautiful. ju'o if a concept is fundamental it's a semantic prim and deserves a gismu or short fu'ivla/zi'evla. I have a feeling that this concept of handedness/chirality/handedness/clockwise can be used in so many cases that it should form other lujvo itself. therefore should have may be even rafsi. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/oJ32JIeDnwEJ. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. ------=_Part_441_13109002.1344584724205 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Friday, August 10, 2012 11:40:37 AM UTC+4, la .lindar. wrote:
I had an idea. Things can only move circularly in one of two directions.=20 Why not just use {carna fi li pa} and {carna fi li re}, or even {carna=20 fi lo pritu} and {carna fi lo zunle}? 

From a completely unbiased standpoint, without an= y cultural knowledge, does that unambiguously indicate direction of rotatio= n?
Which way is "left"? Are we measuring from the bottom or the t= op?
Which way is the "first" rotation? Is that culturally neutral= ? 
I'm pretty sure that it's not.
doi= lindar, your solution works, we only need to to replace "farlu" with somet= hing more generalised.
But....

=
Against lujvo.
Although we can fix any meaning i= n any lujvo I want something more fundamental.
otherwise we can j= ust replace half of gismu with lujvo. It doesnt make tha language more beau= tiful.
ju'o if a concept is fundamental it's a semantic prim and = deserves a gismu or short fu'ivla/zi'evla.

<= br>
I have a feeling that this concept of handedness/chirality/ha= ndedness/clockwise can be used in so many cases that it should form other l= ujvo itself. therefore should have may be even rafsi.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/oJ= 32JIeDnwEJ.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
------=_Part_441_13109002.1344584724205--