Received: from mail-qc0-f189.google.com ([209.85.216.189]:45436) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Szm8n-0004Kn-Bd; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 03:08:32 -0700 Received: by qcac11 with SMTP id c11sf1494843qca.16 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 03:08:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=emxiInR2pZKf+dXlZcmVR2blaqQsRVcSdMW6rztr7h8=; b=kaD8w8rBXNNqrUbrevGi4r04EERzKmpIZjxgACr9k4AYcm24MI6hto2yIc5ztJM8gO KJJzbqccaVS4svdKEBsuFnw6trJ9WWUiqHRLevVLLOF7U7plhHr/FRpMhxW45iWF+a93 Itci0Nljx6JTT/QoIssAetGH73H9LrVAHV8oU= Received: by 10.52.97.102 with SMTP id dz6mr262612vdb.2.1344593298519; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 03:08:18 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.220.141.210 with SMTP id n18ls1148841vcu.2.gmail; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 03:08:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.174.167 with SMTP id bt7mr31284vdc.15.1344593298085; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 03:08:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 03:08:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Gleki Arxokuna To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: Subject: [lojban] The global problem of mirror paired predicates MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates internal as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_562_15923310.1344593297396" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_562_15923310.1344593297396 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 There are several pairs of predicates that can be expressed in a different way. 1. left - right 2. south - north 3. east - west 4. female - male 5. white - black 6. expensive - cheap 7. healthy - ill 8. good - bad Some conlangs like Esperanto have only one root for each pair and use prefixes (e.g. "anti-") to express the second member of the set. So left = anti-right ill = anti-healthy or patro - father patrino - mother (suffix -in- for females) Ithkuil employs a different approach. It uses two affixes, something like "plus" and "minus" to determine where on the scale we are present. so e.g. we have a root for "good/bad" (let it be ROOT1) and for "left-right" (let it be ROOT2) and mark them with prefixes. good = plus-ROOT1 bad = minus-ROOT2 right = plus-ROOT1 left = minus-ROOT2 If such policy applied in Lojbanistan left-handed people would definitely leave the community as "minus" prefix is associated both with "bad" and "left hand". Somehow we must choose what is positive and what is negative. Therefore I state that *AFFIX POLICY FOR SCALE PREDICATE IN ESPERANTO AND ITHKUIL IS NOT CULTURALLY NEUTRAL.* The only way to be culturally neutral is the policy of many natural languages, i.e. having two separate words for each member of the pair. In Lojban we have {zunle - pritu}, {bemro - snanu} etc. Note that even in Esperanto separate root appeared for cheap instead of just "anti-expensive" which proves that such policy is naturalistic. (This message appeared after discussing "clockwise" and "counterclockwise" concepts in a separate topic that in my opinion also deserve separate words). Other solutions are culturally non-neutral. Almost every person belongs to some social minority: left-handed minority, sexual minorities, ethnic minorities. But together they constitute MAJORITY of the population. In other words only the current policy of Lojban is best. Yes, two separate words instead of one+affix is the cost of such neutrality. (If you wanna be non-neutral please use {tolpritu} instead of {zunle}, it's absolutely not a problem). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/hQeAPix8AEcJ. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. ------=_Part_562_15923310.1344593297396 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable There are several pairs of predicates that can be expressed in a different = way.
1. left - right
2. south - north
3. east - wes= t
4. female - male
5. white - black
6. expens= ive - cheap
7. healthy - ill
8. good - bad
Some conlangs like Esperanto have only one root for each pair = and use prefixes (e.g. "anti-") to express the second member of the set.
So 
left =3D anti-right
ill =3D  anti= -healthy

or
patro - father
pat= rino - mother (suffix -in- for females)

Ithkuil em= ploys a different approach. It uses two affixes, something like "plus" and = "minus" to determine where on the scale we are present.
so e.g. w= e have a root for "good/bad" (let it be ROOT1) and for  "left-right" (= let it be ROOT2) and mark them with prefixes.

good= =3D plus-ROOT1
bad =3D minus-ROOT2
right =3D plus-ROOT= 1
left =3D minus-ROOT2

If such policy ap= plied in Lojbanistan left-handed people would definitely leave the communit= y as "minus" prefix is associated both with "bad" and "left hand".
Somehow we must choose what is positive and what is negative.
T= herefore I state that
AFFIX POLICY FOR SCALE PREDICATE IN ESPE= RANTO AND ITHKUIL IS NOT CULTURALLY NEUTRAL.
The only way to = be culturally neutral is the policy of many natural languages, i.e. having = two separate words for each member of the pair.
In Lojban we have= {zunle - pritu}, {bemro - snanu} etc.
Note that even in Esperant= o separate root appeared for cheap instead of just "anti-expensive" which p= roves that such policy is naturalistic.

(This mess= age appeared after discussing "clockwise" and "counterclockwise" concepts i= n a separate topic that in my opinion also deserve separate words).

Other solutions are culturally non-neutral.
Alm= ost every person belongs  to some social minority: left-handed minorit= y, sexual minorities, ethnic minorities. But together they constitute MAJOR= ITY of the population.

In other words only the cur= rent policy of Lojban is best.
Yes, two separate words instead of= one+affix is the cost of such neutrality.
(If you wanna be non-n= eutral please use {tolpritu} instead of {zunle}, it's absolutely not a prob= lem).




--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/hQ= eAPix8AEcJ.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
------=_Part_562_15923310.1344593297396--