Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f61.google.com ([209.85.215.61]:59759)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCJ2UzZHuDRC38ZOBBRoEA7lIxA@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1Sznx1-00052y-PG; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 05:04:28 -0700
Received: by lage12 with SMTP id e12sf593711lag.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 05:04:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=bHGXOGfqw4HIJVYbAiTmCwQZtC7uHQjmylRw+0H436k=;
        b=J1nl40LIzfbB4fpSM676FW5hLdzMQB+Q9UJ6mDoxmROT7H4vUNeJoNZZ//qFUq/FNv
         MhF0cv6WAvE8dZuxR9nggLTRYAe9H5xengw65YP0opyINkgZQv95RPJx7PBkqrGYsVKO
         zcjlDNPTSfs9/8gyBWiE7gVxwXN1PtAm7lXZY=
Received: by 10.216.0.196 with SMTP id 46mr48562web.42.1344600247047;
        Fri, 10 Aug 2012 05:04:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.14.209.68 with SMTP id r44ls971748eeo.6.gmail; Fri, 10 Aug
 2012 05:04:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.14.173.68 with SMTP id u44mr2767145eel.3.1344600246201;
        Fri, 10 Aug 2012 05:04:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.14.173.68 with SMTP id u44mr2767144eel.3.1344600246189;
        Fri, 10 Aug 2012 05:04:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ey0-f179.google.com (mail-ey0-f179.google.com [209.85.215.179])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d5si5386940eep.0.2012.08.10.05.04.06
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Fri, 10 Aug 2012 05:04:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.179 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.215.179;
Received: by eaa13 with SMTP id 13so435441eaa.24
        for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 05:04:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.14.213.137 with SMTP id a9mr2873301eep.38.1344600246041; Fri,
 10 Aug 2012 05:04:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.14.178.196 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 05:04:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <ac672c68-9edb-4ec0-89c6-8da785cdde41@googlegroups.com>
References: <ac672c68-9edb-4ec0-89c6-8da785cdde41@googlegroups.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 09:04:05 -0300
Message-ID: <CAO7tK2fuTU1LzUXPYTZ0PYw=Stef=Evdqx0vnxyCzMXtvd-21w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] The global problem of mirror paired predicates
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.179 as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 7:08 AM, Gleki Arxokuna
<gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> In Lojban we have {zunle - pritu}, {bemro - snanu} etc.
[...]
> In other words only the current policy of Lojban is best.

It's not such a strict policy though. Many gismu that could have had
an obvious antonym don't have it: melbi, citno, cladu, jinga, cirko,
cinri, zdile, canci, cliva, claxu, cfari, and so on.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.