Received: from mail-ob0-f189.google.com ([209.85.214.189]:34422) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Szugd-0002WV-Nh; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 12:16:02 -0700 Received: by obbun3 with SMTP id un3sf1973268obb.16 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 12:15:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=YQA9vHiAlx0Fes9/4+DwtGC0gBA2RLBdvpyNc0lXQto=; b=tofdnXpJmTan5dw14mFLSgMjPJst/k9wbC/0W/HR3uRTzf7CnpioljpcnCV3P6k+nL OOH7/lHOpZc2ay6IybX2aUMiRszJUHr9+g50u11AWx8HyjOUlr3tU0qmkAtb7pzm3ctP 9My+HBKNUVKgBiOivDNSmUlbYaA81G15LHknM= Received: by 10.236.182.35 with SMTP id n23mr1010141yhm.5.1344626148913; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 12:15:48 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.236.149.34 with SMTP id w22ls8076623yhj.8.gmail; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 12:15:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.74.196 with SMTP id x44mr2115163yhd.38.1344626148263; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 12:15:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.74.196 with SMTP id x44mr2115162yhd.38.1344626148248; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 12:15:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-yw0-f45.google.com (mail-yw0-f45.google.com [209.85.213.45]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c61si1304011yhm.3.2012.08.10.12.15.48 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 10 Aug 2012 12:15:48 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lytlesw@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.45 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.213.45; Received: by mail-yw0-f45.google.com with SMTP id p34so1852520yhp.4 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 12:15:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.50.154.232 with SMTP id vr8mr432384igb.2.1344626148022; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 12:15:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.20.11 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 12:15:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <201aced6-3e11-408d-b3ec-c31d042519c7@googlegroups.com> <50eeeab2-c661-4c30-8cda-2f9ddb8767de@googlegroups.com> From: MorphemeAddict Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:15:16 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Direction of Rotation To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: lytlesw@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lytlesw@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.45 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lytlesw@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae934101fe89a7c04c6ee2bd3 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --14dae934101fe89a7c04c6ee2bd3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 2:51 PM, MorphemeAddict wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 3:24 AM, Jonathan Jones wrote: > >> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 1:18 AM, la .lindar. wrote: >> >>> Maybe something like {prityfalgu'o} and {zulfalgu'o}? >> >> >> That's fairly inaccurate. Rotation has nothing to with gravity, and >> falling /requires/ it. It is perfectly possible for something to >> move/rotate in a clockwise direction without falling. Every celestial body >> that isn't rotating counter-clockwise does it. (technically: the rotation >> of the Earth has nothing to do with the fact that the Earth is perpetually >> falling toward Sol.) > > > What is the standard for determining north/right-left? > Whether Earth (and other bodies in space) rotate and revolve clockwise or > counterclockwise is purely arbitrary, 50/50. But once any one thing is > determined to be north, everything else follows. > How about using chirality as the basis of a definition? > Or, as someone has already mentioned, the basic righthandedness of humans? The fact that an object has a top and bottom does not in any way determine whether that object spins left or right. stevo > > stevo > >> >> >> -- >> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >> >> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "lojban" group. >> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --14dae934101fe89a7c04c6ee2bd3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Morphem= eAddict <lytlesw@gmail.com> wrote:


On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 a= t 3:24 AM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 1:18 AM, la .lindar= . <lindarthebard@gmail.com> wrote:
Maybe something like {prityfalgu'o} and {zulfalgu'o}?

That's fairly inaccurate. Rotation has not= hing to with gravity, and falling /requires/ it. It is perfectly possible f= or something to move/rotate in a clockwise direction without falling. Every= celestial body that isn't rotating counter-clockwise does it. (technic= ally: the rotation of the Earth has nothing to do with the fact that the Ea= rth is perpetually falling toward Sol.)

What is the standard for determining north/right-= left?=A0
Whether Earth (and other bodies in space) rotate and rev= olve clockwise or counterclockwise is purely arbitrary, 50/50. But once any= one thing is determined to be north, everything else follows.=A0
How about using chirality as the basis of a definition?=A0
=

Or, as someone has already mentioned, the = basic righthandedness of humans?=A0

The fact that = an object has a top and bottom does not in any way determine whether that o= bject spins left or right.=A0

stevo

stevo=A0


--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo piln= o be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Lu= ke, I am your father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--14dae934101fe89a7c04c6ee2bd3--