Received: from mail-ey0-f189.google.com ([209.85.215.189]:64272)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCMHEmaCOBhDv1paBBRoE-gDarw@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1Szzqq-0005vF-2I; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 17:46:56 -0700
Received: by eaan13 with SMTP id n13sf819406eaa.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 17:46:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=U0dOvKhDZ/rZxVFrKwOL5yjZvvzg3EUdlzjMyF8o+SI=;
        b=ZTugrKahNaNow2klytLHETv3P9rdjsRWsYk82olspC4IHtNeZzFdWDPANYqyqelRmy
         rKHcQo/TxrXyyvORShHT3B96EsXSaj1+D9scCZeGhj9AkK71eRhzTFng9g8UDPB2R65A
         I9AAk11lJ0cE79UftbyjBtiu/2z8Z0mOAHw2U=
Received: by 10.204.13.69 with SMTP id b5mr249833bka.9.1344645999870;
        Fri, 10 Aug 2012 17:46:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.204.7.213 with SMTP id e21ls3696258bke.2.gmail; Fri, 10 Aug
 2012 17:46:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.15.209 with SMTP id l17mr653681bka.6.1344645999236;
        Fri, 10 Aug 2012 17:46:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.15.209 with SMTP id l17mr653680bka.6.1344645999213;
        Fri, 10 Aug 2012 17:46:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f41.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f41.google.com [209.85.215.41])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q3si91702bkv.1.2012.08.10.17.46.39
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Fri, 10 Aug 2012 17:46:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.41 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.215.41;
Received: by lahd3 with SMTP id d3so1031202lah.28
        for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 17:46:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.109.166 with SMTP id ht6mr109666lab.46.1344645998799; Fri,
 10 Aug 2012 17:46:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.152.136.73 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 17:46:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAMKwHj3izp+aA_vzjxcF1MiVw8F06Jgg5pHgZhP=YqsALwrfng@mail.gmail.com>
References: <e4a06349-05ee-4a2c-b1ca-31463945eec6@googlegroups.com>
	<CAGO2uOMiGB98mBuFfu_PEQ3unwoLtfqDO9r5AN0--hH_cmW=wA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMKwHj3wO1wVmhm0DEDyN8xa8LCVMjC+EHBgir-a3K8g5Eh_Ow@mail.gmail.com>
	<201208102246.34877.jezuch@interia.pl>
	<CAMKwHj1OjtwSTsCtPKHGC9ZYPhn5=w-hhgwpsnjAactnZBeLjA@mail.gmail.com>
	<ec5013b5-4697-4c4b-acd8-dcf61ba99510@googlegroups.com>
	<CAMKwHj3izp+aA_vzjxcF1MiVw8F06Jgg5pHgZhP=YqsALwrfng@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 18:46:38 -0600
Message-ID: <CAMKwHj3C0qb-8ujWojAF8d97nAJDVoUqQirnjgQ6c-Lkg9kNkA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Direction of Rotation
From: Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.41 as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec54ee62c1b6cb104c6f2cb1b
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

--bcaec54ee62c1b6cb104c6f2cb1b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 6:11 PM, la .lindar. <lindarthebard@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Escape Landsome, you're not contributing to the conversation by
>> misunderstanding basic concepts and then arguing against opinions nobody
>> has. Nobody was claiming to know of a culturally-neutral word for
>> "clockwise", therefore nobody is inclined to prove it. The entire topic of
>> this conversation is precisely about whether or not we *can* come up with
>> such a thing. Also, how do you not understand what a reference frame is? If
>> the north end of the earth is pointed toward you, it appears to be spinning
>> anticlockwise, but if the south end is pointed toward you, it appears to be
>> spinning clockwise. How is that not obvious and intrinsic to the concept to
>> you?
>>
>> Back to the point, can we come up with the *least* wrong answer *right
>> now* so I have something to use at all?
>> Is anybody going to misunderstand {carna fi lo pritu} if we apply
>> Powell's Principle?
>>
>
> What's Powell's Principle?
>
>
>> I really need anything, so if you have an answer that's less incorrect,
>> please let me know.
>>
>
> The only thing I can think of that may be less incorrect is {carna fi li
> [ma'u/ni'u]}, but it requires an understanding of polar notation to get.


Oh yes, and no matter what you use, you'll still have to add {...ci'e
lodu'u X cu galraipau} if it isn't obvious.

-- 
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.


--bcaec54ee62c1b6cb104c6f2cb1b
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Jonathan Jones =
<span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:eyeonus@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank=
">eyeonus@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quo=
te" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"=
>
<div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div class=3D"im">On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 6:11 P=
M, la .lindar. <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:lindarthebard@gmail.=
com" target=3D"_blank">lindarthebard@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><bl=
ockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #=
ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">

Escape Landsome, you&#39;re not contributing to the conversation by misunde=
rstanding basic concepts and then arguing against opinions nobody has. Nobo=
dy was claiming to know of a culturally-neutral word for &quot;clockwise&qu=
ot;, therefore nobody is inclined to prove it. The entire topic of this con=
versation is precisely about whether or not we *can* come up with such a th=
ing. Also, how do you not understand what a reference frame is? If the nort=
h end of the earth is pointed toward you, it appears to be spinning anticlo=
ckwise, but if the south end is pointed toward you, it appears to be spinni=
ng clockwise. How is that not obvious and intrinsic to the concept to you?<=
div>

<br></div><div>Back to the point, can we come up with the *least* wrong ans=
wer *right now* so I have something to use at all?</div><div>Is anybody goi=
ng to misunderstand {carna fi lo pritu} if we apply Powell&#39;s Principle?=
</div>

</blockquote></div><div><br>What&#39;s Powell&#39;s Principle?<br>=A0</div>=
<div class=3D"im"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .=
8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>I really need anythin=
g, so if you have an answer that&#39;s less incorrect, please let me know.<=
/div>

</blockquote></div></div><br>The only thing I can think of that may be less=
 incorrect is {carna fi li [ma&#39;u/ni&#39;u]}, but it requires an underst=
anding of polar notation to get.</blockquote></div><br>Oh yes, and no matte=
r what you use, you&#39;ll still have to add {...ci&#39;e lodu&#39;u X cu g=
alraipau} if it isn&#39;t obvious.<br clear=3D"all">
<br>-- <br>mu&#39;o mi&#39;e .aionys.<br><br>.i.e&#39;ucai ko cmima lo piln=
o be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo&#39;o<br>(Come to the Dot Side! Lu=
ke, I am your father. :D )<br><br>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
lojban" group.<br />
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou=
ps.com.<br />

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban=
?hl=3Den.<br />



--bcaec54ee62c1b6cb104c6f2cb1b--