Received: from mail-vb0-f61.google.com ([209.85.212.61]:48221) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1T08cc-0003uR-KI; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 03:08:51 -0700 Received: by vbzb23 with SMTP id b23sf2747993vbz.16 for ; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 03:08:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=fvQPLwPJF/F2szf/brh+XqdUql4U8fI88JhDjDTQJMw=; b=PCAzlO0+m46D8Uk42ECMlZW2byZigPXyIYDaaHffRg2Wy+uSp5sYBzs8R+9tnb5Eoc kj0nlZuRi9bA8hKBhkJ2yXIdOF8cwB3HXNRo+oyVKCY3v2qTtT3O2t4TN0qaPrJlLMCb HBdf+3pci6JF6/u7CNLo4XZDwPBvf+kD3lZzs= Received: by 10.52.90.129 with SMTP id bw1mr1349508vdb.13.1344679715859; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 03:08:35 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.52.36.147 with SMTP id q19ls3818311vdj.4.gmail; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 03:08:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.246.98 with SMTP id xv2mr687386vec.1.1344679715273; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 03:08:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.246.98 with SMTP id xv2mr687385vec.1.1344679715264; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 03:08:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vc0-f176.google.com (mail-vc0-f176.google.com [209.85.220.176]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y4si224527vds.2.2012.08.11.03.08.35 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 11 Aug 2012 03:08:35 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of rpglover64@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.176 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.220.176; Received: by vcbfl11 with SMTP id fl11so2151388vcb.7 for ; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 03:08:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.200.197 with SMTP id ju5mr5471425vec.36.1344679714964; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 03:08:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.58.252.104 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 03:08:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <201208102246.34877.jezuch@interia.pl> From: ".arpis." Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 06:08:14 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Direction of Rotation To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: rpglover64@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of rpglover64@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.176 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rpglover64@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / Escape, you are being needlessly confrontational (and somewhat condescending), and it is not helping to make your point. To contrast your point, in high school and university in the US, we are taught basic calculus and basic physics, and it is made clear that some arbitrary sign convention is necessary, and positive is chosen to denote counterclockwise angles. This is a thoroughly shared cross-cultural framework, and it's useful. Also, you seem to be arguing a point that no-one is disputing. We are trying to find a good (arbitrary) convention, which is present across (or at least apparent to) various cultures; we are not trying to find an absolute frame of reference. On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 4:33 AM, Escape Landsome wrote: > . > > To put it simply, you may say that CLOCKWISE and COUNTER-CLOCKWISE are > defined is LEFT and RIGHT are, or if DIRECT and REVERSE FRAMES are. > > Let's say that X = (1,0,0), Y = (0,1,0) and Z = (0,0,1) are a direct > frame (X,Y,Z). > > Then (X,Z,Y) (or any simple transposition of (X,Y,Z) is a reverse > frame. (indirect frame) > > Det (X,Y,Z) = +1 > > Det(X,Z,Y) = -1 > > Two frames are oriented the same way if they have the same Det > > Two frames are oriented opposite ways if theirs Det are opposite > > Now, the STRANGE thing you learn in Tensor algebra is that there is no > way to tell Det, outside a convention. > > One COULD decide that it is (X,Y,Z) that has Det = -1, after all ! > > Then it would be (X,Z,Y) that has Det = +1 > > The only thing that remains STABLE in all this is that their Dets are opposite ! > (since there is a transposition of Y and Z between (X,Y,Z) and (X,Z,Y)) > > --- > > Now, human beings and physicists in particular need a way to compute Det. > > So they CREATE A WAY to compute some Det, by STATING that X, Y and Z > are "normally" in those directions we know. > > But, --- hold on, this is the difficult point where most people can't > follow the reasonning ---, there is no way to specify this out of a > convention rooted in OUR EXPERIENCE OF OUR DAILY UNIVERSE, that is, in > OUR BODY and OUR CULTURE. > > For, saying that X is defined as (1,0,0), Y as (0,1,0) and Z as > (0,0,1) does not mean anything sensible in the absolute. It means > somethings SENSIBLE only if we have SENSES that tell us, for instance, > that X direction is the sense of my right hand thumb, Y my right hand > index, and Z my right hand middle finger... > > THEN, it becomes sensible > > But, without that, it would be possible to trace the Z-axis in > opposite direction, and Z would still be (0,0,1), --- but you would > say "clockwise" and I would see "counterclockwise". > > --- > > So, to get the coordinate system sensible, you need to root them in an > experience. > > Kant's experience of a right hand means that if you write down the set > of all points pertaining to a right hand, R = { (x1,y1,z1), > (x2,y2,z2), (x3,y3,z3), ... } > > you still have no clue whether R is a right hand or a left hand, until > you have not decided to set an orientation to space --- which is what > space does NOT have per se. > > ORIENTATION does NOT pertain to space, as all mathematicians and > kantians know (and wittgenstenians too, and carrollians too). > ORIENTATION comes only through convention. > > --- > > No, I'm in holiday, so I do not have books with me currently, so we'll > have to wait a month or so till I can give you extracts of high maths > books (or philosophy books) that speak of that, but all this is known > for long by scholars. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > -- mu'o mi'e .arpis. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.