Received: from mail-bk0-f61.google.com ([209.85.214.61]:40105) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1T0D2A-0007Uo-VO; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 07:51:27 -0700 Received: by bkwj4 with SMTP id j4sf988413bkw.16 for ; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 07:51:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=d5kjem8FeQ1pk1JufS2oMfHk+2kTPvNuZEHq/AuVRKs=; b=IiAWF0Af60kaW7D0j2wloTySfwqx2alwBAodcDqOwsYU7RVDa9ulED2ADJd+R9krSH /+JpaLspt21HyPKuQtBBNLNYustsoUcfDPcdG96wHQ3/6annuPKvKZzsFO6+3VD6XRLa oWeOk23BHikOR6kTLeqe2HFgsEW+bYD3Qi7bE= Received: by 10.180.92.168 with SMTP id cn8mr109271wib.1.1344696675157; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 07:51:15 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.14.205.73 with SMTP id i49ls421464eeo.2.gmail; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 07:51:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.179.72 with SMTP id g48mr3465051eem.2.1344696674340; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 07:51:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.179.72 with SMTP id g48mr3465050eem.2.1344696674330; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 07:51:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ey0-f180.google.com (mail-ey0-f180.google.com [209.85.215.180]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d5si2871683eep.0.2012.08.11.07.51.14 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 11 Aug 2012 07:51:14 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.180 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.215.180; Received: by eaad13 with SMTP id d13so499552eaa.25 for ; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 07:51:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.175.7 with SMTP id y7mr7227404eel.29.1344696674165; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 07:51:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.178.196 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 07:51:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9afe3883-606f-436f-a383-c54dbb5bc688@googlegroups.com> References: <9afe3883-606f-436f-a383-c54dbb5bc688@googlegroups.com> Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 11:51:14 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] {lo broda cu brode} vs. {lo brode cu broda} vs. {broda je brode} vs. {brode no'oi broda} vs. Lesniewski vs. NLP From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.180 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-7 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 6:42 AM, Gleki Arxokuna wrote: > Can anyone tell me the difference between > > {lo broda cu brode} vs. {lo brode cu broda} vs. {broda je brode} I would say it's a matter of information structure, "lo" marking the topic and "cu" the comment. (See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topic%E2%80%93comment ) In "lo nixli cu limna" you are talking about girls and saying that they are swimmers, in "lo limna cu nixli" you are talking about swimmers and saying that they are girls. "nixli je limna" is more complex: you are talking about something implicit in the context, and making the compound claim that they are girl swimmers. > What is more interesting that latros entered a new cmavo {no'oi} which is > the same as {noi} but applied to selbri. > And {lo=3Dzo'e noi}. > If so what's the difference between > {lo broda cu brode} vs. {lo brode cu broda} vs. {broda je brode} vs. {bro= de > no'oi broda}? "noi" introduces an separate clause, which is not part of the main claim. It will usually be incidental information, or something the speaker is taking for granted rather than advancing as a claim. The noi-clause has its own independent illocutionary force too, so you could make it a question or a command while the main clause is a claim or vice versa. > Next. > In Lesniewski's logic "a =E5 b" means "Earth is a planet", "Alice is a hu= man" > but not vice versa. > In Natural Language Processing there is a predicate "instance-of" so that > "New York is a city" turns into "New York is an-instance-of a city". > > How should I understand the same stuff in Lojban? It sounds like "me": "ko'a me ko'e" mu'o mi'e xorxes --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.