Received: from mail-ey0-f189.google.com ([209.85.215.189]:46069) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1T0Zyt-0000pr-Jc; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 08:21:40 -0700 Received: by eaan13 with SMTP id n13sf1222921eaa.16 for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 08:21:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=knKc43vLYgvbG0f3/QS4WMnFkPIRsPgAXgSPqg6ZX9o=; b=JfeUVytSZqulmMZd9OeCmx/oUBlhn1abgLJqWYPa3js04H1Ijk0yUutJBAN8txQi0R XdJpAoqfv/EsEiXw15Ukl6hVj+uq9iwyzvmW8tnBpL3c0R8TkCAQA7JBxWgtAOjQ6pm/ TpYUHswK+J5/Sm4rL252+sNrRwh1ReNvQ8kdY= Received: by 10.180.101.197 with SMTP id fi5mr245040wib.3.1344784883865; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 08:21:23 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.14.205.73 with SMTP id i49ls522114eeo.2.gmail; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 08:21:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.173.68 with SMTP id u44mr4130383eel.3.1344784882988; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 08:21:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.173.68 with SMTP id u44mr4130382eel.3.1344784882979; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 08:21:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ee0-f44.google.com (mail-ee0-f44.google.com [74.125.83.44]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d5si6851506eep.0.2012.08.12.08.21.22 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 12 Aug 2012 08:21:22 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.44 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.83.44; Received: by eekb45 with SMTP id b45so740273eek.3 for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 08:21:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.203.73 with SMTP id e49mr6312636eeo.27.1344784882866; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 08:21:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.178.196 with HTTP; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 08:21:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <50255C09.10805@lojban.org> <1344701600.97921.YahooMailNeo@web184405.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 12:21:22 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] {.au}/{djica}={.ai}/{?}. No gismu for intention From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.44 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 11:32 PM, Mike S. wrote: > On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 6:52 PM, Jorge Llamb=EDas > wrote: >> Similarly for other attitudinals, "ui" is similar to "ca'e mi >> jarco lo nu mi gleki", "I hereby display my happiness", and so on. > > I would think that ".ui" simply means "I am happy", not "I display my > happiness". "I _hereby_ express my happiness", i.e. "by performing this very speech act, I am expressing my happiness". > Either way, if the speaker is actually unhappy, I think that we > have to admit that he is being disingenuous to his audience if he utters > ".ui" with no hint of irony. Certainly. > Because of this, I think these attitudinals > are as truth-functional as any brivla: they evaluate to a real truth valu= e > given two arguments: the speaker and the proposition that the attitudinal= is > embedded in. Obviously it's hard to know if a person is truthful in the > expression of his own feelings, but there are sometimes signs, and the tr= uth > value of such expressions are still there, however hidden. It doesn't make a whole lot of difference whether we want to call them true/false, honest/dishonest, genuine/fake, felicitous/infelicitous or whatever. The point of avoiding true/false is that for example you can't use "na" to convert a fake "ui" into a genuine one, like you can use it to convert a false statement into a true one, and the same applies to other truth functional operators like logical connectives. It does make sense to distinguish between the truth value of a proposition and the genuinity? genuiness? of an expression. > Even more so in the case with the irrealis attitudinals. If I say ".ai [= I > am giving you a million bucks tomorrow]" when I know that I am bankrupt a= nd > all my banking accounts are overdrawn then clearly I am lying to you. ".= ai > mi dunda la lunra do" is simply (literally) false when uttered by any > non-delusional interlocutor. lie noun 1. a false statement made with deliberate intent to deceive; an intentional untruth; a falsehood. 2. something intended or serving to convey a false impression; imposture: A fake expression of intention can certainly count as a lie in sense 2. mu'o mi'e xorxes --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.