Received: from mail-gg0-f189.google.com ([209.85.161.189]:46467) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1T0dnn-0001xn-Ra; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 12:26:34 -0700 Received: by ggcs5 with SMTP id s5sf3925249ggc.16 for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 12:26:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-ct-class:x-ct-score:x-ct-refid:x-ct-spam :x-authority-analysis:x-cm-score:message-id:date:from:organization :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bBZj9efbLAnsHuPxDyQgQbwz386LNP5P46WW3S0ZPYs=; b=xQxMaiJb4rAJkWexkB0yBXEyCX2P+v17rrsvQtw5A74VtrNAaaut7w3rHcBBzAMPSe 8+JzSi0N4EqnMe8UX83ikhIhU/cGmrFI2UrrRm3kgG1knrgLZA9EfThVLRS1UXKzJLWS 3YwaASzoHR6kIdP7bAiKaC6qo4l3ywZ0BTlf8= Received: by 10.224.31.15 with SMTP id w15mr2179439qac.15.1344799573130; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 12:26:13 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.229.205.83 with SMTP id fp19ls7019520qcb.3.gmail; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 12:26:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.17.135 with SMTP id s7mr3597532qaa.1.1344799572624; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 12:26:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.17.135 with SMTP id s7mr3597529qaa.1.1344799572612; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 12:26:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eastrmfepo201.cox.net (eastrmfepo201.cox.net. [68.230.241.216]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id k34si1181723qcz.1.2012.08.12.12.26.12; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 12:26:12 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 68.230.241.216 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of lojbab@lojban.org) client-ip=68.230.241.216; Received: from eastrmimpo109 ([68.230.241.222]) by eastrmfepo201.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.04.00 201-2260-137-20101110) with ESMTP id <20120812192612.ZNPL5450.eastrmfepo201.cox.net@eastrmimpo109> for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 15:26:12 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.101] ([70.187.237.100]) by eastrmimpo109 with cox id lvSB1j00T2AfMYu01vSCua; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 15:26:12 -0400 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A02020A.50280354.003C,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=DeGVW4RW c=1 sm=1 a=MQZuvjT3xUZLKv0gclfWMg==:17 a=YsUzL_8ObRgA:10 a=umyTHFUHQVoA:10 a=xmHE3fpoGJwA:10 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=8YJikuA2AAAA:8 a=M0Kh97TxxGjDXPpTa-YA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 a=dxBpO5_FDU0A:10 a=MQZuvjT3xUZLKv0gclfWMg==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Message-ID: <50280354.1090900@lojban.org> Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 15:26:12 -0400 From: "Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - LLG" Organization: The Logical Language Group, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] {.au}/{djica}={.ai}/{?}. No gismu for intention References: <50255C09.10805@lojban.org> <1344701600.97921.YahooMailNeo@web184405.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <1344741225.61800.YahooMailNeo@web184403.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <94d360e3-6376-4140-ba22-b99646e9c8c0@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: <94d360e3-6376-4140-ba22-b99646e9c8c0@googlegroups.com> X-Original-Sender: lojbab@lojban.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 68.230.241.216 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of lojbab@lojban.org) smtp.mail=lojbab@lojban.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / iesk wrote: > ba'e pe'i di'e > > You are free and officially sanctioned to fake a smile. Politicians do > fake smiles. In spite of all that, a smile usually means something to > you (not in a propositional way). However that works, that's how UIs > should work. > > Whenever human beings smile, we are *usually* entitled to say that they > are happy (I=92m simplifying, obviously). You are wise to assume that > *some* instances of smiling are fake, but you just don't assume that > *all* smiles are fake. If you did, you'd probably end up being > considered mentally ill or something. > > Whenever a Lojban speaker says {.ui}, same thing. It is part of the > Lojban Sprachspiel.^^ > > Whenever I feel like giving in to the temptation of thinking about UIs > in terms of truth and falsehood, I remind myself that UIs are > essentially like body language, viz. (to the ideal Lojban speaker) they > are a natural extension and, if you will, enrichment of it. Verbalised > non-verbal communication. go'i iecai --=20 Bob LeChevalier lojbab@lojban.org www.lojban.org President and Founder, The Logical Language Group, Inc. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.